Hi
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Meyer Lansky marku...@inbox.ru wrote:
Hello everyone!
I decided to take fuzzing task Scheduler CFS
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/sched/fair.c
Question: I just recently learning fuzzing and it is at all possible fuzzy
scheduler?
If so
Hi,
This company released a obfuscated kernel module in GPL 2.
http://www.incentivespro.com/downloads.html
So, they didn't release the code at all. This is ok ?
This against the law ?
If you download the source for linux you will se this code:
/*
*
* Copyright (C) 2007-2015 SimplyCore, LLC
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:49:22PM -0300, Lucas Tanure wrote:
Hi,
This company released a obfuscated kernel module in GPL 2.
http://www.incentivespro.com/downloads.html
So, they didn't release the code at all. This is ok ?
This against the law ?
Why are you asking developers legal
Off the topic maybe, this usb redirector could be built above usbip, which is
in the mainline.
-daveti
On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Greg KH g...@kroah.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:49:22PM -0300, Lucas Tanure wrote:
Hi,
This company released a obfuscated kernel module in GPL
snip
I dont understand what goal is it supposed to achieve
at the beginning of the headerfile
snip
The 'goal' is to prevent 'redefinition' errors, like Stephan Müller said it
is a 'include guard'.
A explanation of why and how to use include guards can be found here:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:49:22 -0300, Lucas Tanure said:
Hi,
This company released a obfuscated kernel module in GPL 2.
http://www.incentivespro.com/downloads.html
So, they didn't release the code at all. This is ok ?
This against the law ?
We're code hackers here.
If the
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 03:49:22PM -0300, Lucas Tanure wrote:
Hi,
This company released a obfuscated kernel module in GPL 2.
http://www.incentivespro.com/downloads.html
So, they didn't release the code at all. This is ok ?
This against the law ?
If you download the source for linux you
From: kernelnewbies-boun...@kernelnewbies.org
[mailto:kernelnewbies-boun...@kernelnewbies.org] On Behalf Of Lucas Tanure
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:49 AM
To: Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Obfuscate code GPL 2 - The source uses kernel structs and GPL2 API
Hi,
This company
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:13:48 -, Jeff Haran said:
But it seems to me that if it builds, then theyâve released the code.
No - the GPLv2 says:
The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source
code means
Hi Guys,
Many thanks. It was just for the sake of curiosity. I know that I should
ask lawyers about that, but it's good to hear some view points from other
developers.
The best action is to simply not use their solution, and spread the word.
Like Jeff Haran, That is just too funny.
Thanks!!
--
Hi all!
On Die, 2015-07-21 at 11:04 +0530, Amit Pandey wrote:
[... crap deleted ...]
Please let me know whether I was clear with the explanation.
It was clear and it is total and absolute crap:
- first, check with the .h (and .c) files in the kernel (and all others
which get it right), that
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:04:15AM +0530, Amit Pandey wrote:
Hi Ahmed,
See the comments inline
#ifndef _LINUX_LIST_H // If not defined _LINUX_LIST_H macro
#define _LINUX_LIST_H // then define this macro
#include linuxlist.h // and include linuxlist.h header file
#endif
Hello everyone
I want to be able to send 1-2KB of data from host, using BARs of a PCIe
device, with very low latency.
I am working on an FPGA project in which I have to send packet data from
Host to FPGA over PCIe 3.0 interface. This is a latency critical
application and therefore I want to use
13 matches
Mail list logo
