On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:07:08PM -0600, Perry Hooker wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, Tobin - I appreciate the reply.
Please don't top post http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
I'm not an endian expert so I will not comment on the technical
aspects of the path, I can however, comment on the
Thanks for the advice, Tobin - I appreciate the reply.
In this case, I've already followed your advice - I studied the
reviewer's comments with a fine-toothed comb (some of his comments
were flat-out incorrect), and traced the buffer in question back to
its source. It appears to be holding
On 18 April 2017 at 11:04, Code Soldier1 wrote:
> Thanks a lot Greg and Peter.
Hello,
Top-posting is frowned upon in the Linux Kernel mailing lists. Please
use the interleaved style instead, as described in this Wikipedia
article:
Thanks a lot Greg and Peter.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:38:52AM -0700, Code Soldier1 wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> No I did not know about 'make localmodconfig'. Can you kindly explain.
>
> Did you look at the help in the kernel
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:28:20 +0300, Lev Olshvang said:
> I would like to constrain process (by name) or group of process to specific
> network interface and to specific port.
Let's take a step back. What problem are you trying to solve by constraining
the processes?
pgprLGP7LqYAe.pgp
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:38:52AM -0700, Code Soldier1 wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> No I did not know about 'make localmodconfig'. Can you kindly explain.
Did you look at the help in the kernel makefile:
make help
will show you what the different options do.
localmodconfig makes a kernel
Hi Greg,
No I did not know about 'make localmodconfig'. Can you kindly explain.
As far as the change is concerned I am planning to change a few things
and experiment, so there is nothing specific.
Thanks,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Code Soldier1 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone suggest what is the fastest way to build a minimal kernel
> and boot. For example if I am working on TCP and would like to make a
> small change and reboot, what is the fastest way, I rather not build
> the whole
Hi,
Can someone suggest what is the fastest way to build a minimal kernel
and boot. For example if I am working on TCP and would like to make a
small change and reboot, what is the fastest way, I rather not build
the whole kernel.
Thanks
--
CS1
___
I think docker or lxc may help you. You run the process(es) in a container
and attach a tap interface to the container, the process inside the
container can only see the attached interface.
Regards,
2017-04-18 4:28 GMT-03:00 Lev Olshvang :
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to
Hi,
top command show si (sw irq) and hi (hw irq). The linux has
request_threaded_irq(irq, handler, thread_fn, ...) ...
Is `si' the time spend on thread_fn and `hi' the time spend on handler
Regards,
--
“If you're going to try, go all the way. Otherwise, don't even start. ..."
Charles
Hi all, I would like to constrain process (by name) or group of process to specific network interface and to specific port. Please advice if there is some cgroups controller or netfilter module? ThanX, Lev
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo