Hi,
i'm back at work with my patch for automatic CD loading, but the target
moves faster than i can follow.
Meanwhile the sr part of my change plays on a fresh construction site
of linux-scsi:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/730eced4-c804-a78f-3d52-2a448dbd1...@interlog.com/T/#t
"rework
Hi,
i might get a community problem with the goal of my patch.
While googling for hints of acceptance for cdrom on
linux-s...@vger.kernel.org i came to a thread where a much more
expensive fix of the problem was obviously rejected by Jens Axboe
in november 2019:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:49:51AM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am preparing my first patch.
> May i ask for review and advise how to make it acceptable ?
If you are not running it already you can catch common mistakes by
running checkpatch script from the kernel source top directory
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > Just take all maintainers as recipients.
> > ax...@kernel.dk linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org j...@linux.ibm.com
> > martin.peter...@oracle.com linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
>
> Really that loudly ?
> Ain't
Hi,
Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Just take all maintainers as recipients.
> ax...@kernel.dk linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org j...@linux.ibm.com
> martin.peter...@oracle.com linux-s...@vger.kernel.org
Really that loudly ?
Ain't linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org too general ?
> It is probably best to base it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02:21AM -0400, Leam Hall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:20 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> > That is also documented in the ever-growing submitting patches document
> > somewhere...
>
> This?
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
That's
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:20 AM Greg KH wrote:
> That is also documented in the ever-growing submitting patches document
> somewhere...
This?
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html
___
Kernelnewbies mailing list
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:52:56AM +0200, Garrit Franke wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Noob here.
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:49 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > Commit 210ba1d1724f5c4ed87a2ab1a21ca861a915f734 of january 2008 switched
> > sr_drive_status() away from indirectly using sr_do_ioctl()
Hi Thomas,
Noob here.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:49 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> Commit 210ba1d1724f5c4ed87a2ab1a21ca861a915f734 of january 2008 switched
> sr_drive_status() away from indirectly using sr_do_ioctl() for sending
> TEST UNIT READY commands. sr_do_ioctl() has a wait-and-retry loop
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am preparing my first patch.
> May i ask for review and advise how to make it acceptable ?
>
> The patch shall fix an old regression of cdrom and sr drivers.
> Although drivers/cdrom has no mailing list entry in MAINTAINERS, i
Hi,
i am preparing my first patch.
May i ask for review and advise how to make it acceptable ?
The patch shall fix an old regression of cdrom and sr drivers.
Although drivers/cdrom has no mailing list entry in MAINTAINERS, i assume
that such patches should go to linux-s...@vger.kernel.org which
11 matches
Mail list logo
