Re: Would .DTSIs without DTS be accepted into the kernel?

2020-05-04 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:40:00PM +0200, Dávid Virág wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:16 PM Ezra Buehler wrote: > > > As far as I know they don't like that. > > > I see, thanks for the reply! > > Sorry for the double reply, I'm new to mailing lists, and forgot to CC > kernelnewbies. > If

Re: Would .DTSIs without DTS be accepted into the kernel?

2020-05-04 Thread Dávid Virág
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:16 PM Ezra Buehler wrote: > As far as I know they don't like that. > I see, thanks for the reply! Sorry for the double reply, I'm new to mailing lists, and forgot to CC kernelnewbies. If those wouldn't be merged, would drivers for the SOC/Phone be merged without the

Re: Would .DTSIs without DTS be accepted into the kernel?

2020-05-04 Thread Ezra Buehler
On 4 May 2020, at 15:51, Dávid Virág wrote: > > My question is this: Would DTSIs for it's SOC, and its components be merged > without any DTS actually including them? As far as I know they don't like that. Cheers, Ezra. ___ Kernelnewbies mailing

Would .DTSIs without DTS be accepted into the kernel?

2020-05-04 Thread Dávid Virág
Hi, I have an Android phone that I'd like to see running on the mainline kernel one day. Currently it runs a downstream 4.4 kernel. Since the stock (closed source) bootloader on the phone only really checks the SOC in a property in the DTBs but not the model of the phone, I'm sure a DTS for the