Thank-you Greg
On Jul 23 2014, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:45:05PM -0700, Arlie Stephens wrote:
On Jul 23 2014, Kristofer Hallin wrote:
1. No. Depending on what subsystem your are printing logs from you
should use different functions for logging. In the networking
1. No. Depending on what subsystem your are printing logs from you
should use different functions for logging. In the networking
subsystem netdev_dbg is suitable and so on. Otherwise pr_debug will
always work and is always preferred over printk.
2. Use pr_debug.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:16 PM,
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Kristofer Hallin
kristofer.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
1. No. Depending on what subsystem your are printing logs from you
should use different functions for logging. In the networking
subsystem netdev_dbg is suitable and so on. Otherwise pr_debug will
always work
On Jul 23 2014, Kristofer Hallin wrote:
1. No. Depending on what subsystem your are printing logs from you
should use different functions for logging. In the networking
subsystem netdev_dbg is suitable and so on. Otherwise pr_debug will
always work and is always preferred over printk.
Why?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:45:05PM -0700, Arlie Stephens wrote:
On Jul 23 2014, Kristofer Hallin wrote:
1. No. Depending on what subsystem your are printing logs from you
should use different functions for logging. In the networking
subsystem netdev_dbg is suitable and so on. Otherwise
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:00:04PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:45:05PM -0700, Arlie Stephens wrote:
On Jul 23 2014, Kristofer Hallin wrote:
1. No. Depending on what subsystem your are printing logs from you
should use different functions for logging. In the
Hi guys,
Thanks for the help, I learned a lot of new things.
On 7/23/14, 8:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:00:04PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:45:05PM -0700, Arlie Stephens wrote:
On Jul 23 2014, Kristofer Hallin wrote:
1. No. Depending on what
