On Thu Apr 4, 2024 at 2:56 AM EEST, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:32:02AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, at 10:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > >> On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers
On 4/3/24 4:56 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:32:02AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, at 10:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:32:02AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, at 10:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +, Andrew
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, at 10:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> >> Yes, and I agree. We're not looking to try and force this
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> Yes, and I agree. We're not looking to try and force this in with
> >> underhand tactics.
> >>
> >> But a blind "nack
On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> Yes, and I agree. We're not looking to try and force this in with
>> underhand tactics.
>>
>> But a blind "nack to any SHA-1" is similarly damaging in the opposite
>> direction.
>>
>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> Yes, and I agree. We're not looking to try and force this in with
> underhand tactics.
>
> But a blind "nack to any SHA-1" is similarly damaging in the opposite
> direction.
>
Well, reviewers have said they'd prefer that SHA-1
On 23/02/2024 9:27 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 13:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 22/02/2024 9:34 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 04:05, Andrew Cooper
>>> wrote:
On 15/02/2024 8:17 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 23:31, Ross
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 13:30, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 22/02/2024 9:34 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 04:05, Andrew Cooper
> > wrote:
> >> On 15/02/2024 8:17 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 23:31, Ross Philipson
> >>> wrote:
> From: "Daniel
On 22/02/2024 9:34 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 04:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 15/02/2024 8:17 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 23:31, Ross Philipson
>>> wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Smith"
The SHA algorithms are necessary to measure
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 04:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
> On 15/02/2024 8:17 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 23:31, Ross Philipson
> > wrote:
> >> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
> >>
> >> The SHA algorithms are necessary to measure configuration information into
> >> the TPM as
On 15/02/2024 8:17 am, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 23:31, Ross Philipson
> wrote:
>> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
>>
>> The SHA algorithms are necessary to measure configuration information into
>> the TPM as early as possible before using the values. This implementation
>> uses
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 23:31, Ross Philipson wrote:
>
> From: "Daniel P. Smith"
>
> The SHA algorithms are necessary to measure configuration information into
> the TPM as early as possible before using the values. This implementation
> uses the established approach of #including the SHA
13 matches
Mail list logo
