Mohan Kumar M wrote:
gib wrote:
Hi Mohan,
Do you have only one entry for memory node in the /proc/device-tree
directory?
Yes, I have only one entry(for memory) in the /proc/device-tree directory.
Do you know last good working version of kernel (for kdump) and try to
boot into that kernel
Sharyathi Nagesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
While testing with kexec tool, I observed some problems. When application
(kexec) is 32 bit and kernel is 64 bit I observed that loading crash kernel
works without any issues but unloading crash kernel fails.
Hi,
* Jamey Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-23 15:13]:
I was hoping for more feedback than just code style though. :-)
Of course. I'll give it a try first. I'm not very familar with
Windows programming, though. I'm interested in kexec on Windows because
it might be a nice way to start a
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) [2008-05-23 13:14]:
What we need to do is fix /sbin/kexec to pass in the correct
architecture of the kernel for unload as it does for load.
How should it know that it unloads a 32 bit kernel on a 64 bit system?
It doesn't have access to the kernel any
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:48:13PM -0700, Jamey Sharp wrote:
OK, I haven't quite gotten around to posting the Windows kernel driver
source that goes with this. So I'm not asking that this patch be merged,
since nobody else can use it yet. :-) I'd love to get review, though:
Does this look like
Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) [2008-05-23 13:14]:
What we need to do is fix /sbin/kexec to pass in the correct
architecture of the kernel for unload as it does for load.
How should it know that it unloads a 32 bit kernel on a 64 bit system?
Attn:Recipient,
Fondazione Di Vittorio, hereby notify you for a
Grant/Donation cash aid of USD$1,000,000.00 for your own personal
education, and business development.
Qualification numbers (S-222-
6747, C-900-56).
CONTACT DETIALS BELOW:
===
Fondazione
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Simon Horman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, thanks for your work in not only getting this port up and going,
but methodically posted patches relating to it. You have made my job
very easy :-)
I tried. I'm happy to hear I succeeded. :-)
The patch looks a
