On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:16:58AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
It looks like no one ever tested taking a crashdump
from a 64bit kernel with a 32bit userspace on x86,
and we have a reuse-cmdline regression fixes follow.
I seem to recall testing that, but it was many moons ago :-)
This moves the computing of our native archtecture earlier so
that load can use it, as arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c has been
trying to.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman ebied...@aristanetworks.com
---
kexec/kexec.c | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
Generate the correct crashdump header for x86_64 kernels
when a 32bit kernel is used.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman ebied...@aristanetworks.com
---
kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Zitat von Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com:
It looks like no one ever tested taking a crashdump
from a 64bit kernel with a 32bit userspace on x86,
and we have a reuse-cmdline regression fixes follow.
I didn't even know that it is supposed to work...
Regards,
Bernhard
Bernhard Walle bernh...@bwalle.de writes:
Zitat von Eric W. Biederman ebied...@xmission.com:
It looks like no one ever tested taking a crashdump
from a 64bit kernel with a 32bit userspace on x86,
and we have a reuse-cmdline regression fixes follow.
I didn't even know that it is supposed
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:16:58AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
It looks like no one ever tested taking a crashdump
from a 64bit kernel with a 32bit userspace on x86,
and we have a reuse-cmdline regression fixes follow.
Thanks, these patches all look good to me. I have applied and pushed
