On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 04:33:37PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
This is the new syscall kexec_file_load() declaration/interface. I have
reserved the syscall number only for x86_64 so far. Other architectures
(including i386)
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The cr3 register entry can contain the SME encryption bit that indicates
> the PGD is encrypted. The encryption bit should not be used when creating
> a virtual address for the PGD table.
>
> Create a new function,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> The cr3 register entry can contain the SME encryption mask that indicates
> the PGD is encrypted. The encryption mask should not be used when
> creating a virtual address from the cr3 register, so remove the SME
>
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com> wrote:
> On 6/8/2017 1:05 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The cr3 register entr
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:35 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:24:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > sys_move_pages() is an optional syscall, and once we remove
> > the compat version of it in favor of the native one with an
> > in_compat_syscall() check, the x32
> On Sep 19, 2020, at 10:14 AM, h...@zytor.com wrote:
>
> On September 19, 2020 9:23:22 AM PDT, Andy Lutomirski
> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:35 PM Christoph Hellwig
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:24:36PM
> On Apr 11, 2021, at 6:14 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
>
> On 04/09/21 at 07:59pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Why don't we do this unconditionally? At the very best we gain half a
>> megabyte of memory (except the trampoline, which has to live there, but it
>> is only a few kilobytes.)
>
> This is
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 2:52 AM Baoquan He wrote:
>
> On 04/11/21 at 06:49pm, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 11, 2021, at 6:14 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/09/21 at 07:59pm, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >> Why don't
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, at 10:30 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 06:20:27PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 23/02/2024 5:54 pm, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> >> Yes, and I agree. We're not looking to try and force this