Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-22 Thread Yasunori Goto
Hello. Is /proc/iomem updated upon memory hotplug event. Yes. I just checked that (yesterday). I think it would make sense to extend /sys/firmware/memmap on hot-plugging. Just because on reboot, the firmware will see that memory, too, and report it. However, we need a way

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-21 Thread Bernhard Walle
* Vivek Goyal [2008-07-21 09:39]: But the point is, if /sys/devices/system/memory also represents all the physical memory present in the system then it might be not be justified to create another similar interface. (Until and unless there is something unique about /sys/firmware/memmap). But

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-21 Thread Vivek Goyal
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:47:33PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: * Vivek Goyal [2008-07-21 09:39]: But the point is, if /sys/devices/system/memory also represents all the physical memory present in the system then it might be not be justified to create another similar interface. (Until

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-20 Thread Dave Hansen
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 01:11 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: Maybe the firmware memmap code can simply run a little later in the boot sequence? Heh, I'm catching up on this thread... It is possible that it could run later. But, I do know that there are at least a couple of these tables (on various

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-20 Thread Thomas Meyer
Am Sonntag, den 20.07.2008, 02:01 -0700 schrieb Dave Hansen: On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 01:11 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote: Maybe the firmware memmap code can simply run a little later in the boot sequence? Heh, I'm catching up on this thread... On that thread?

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-20 Thread Bernhard Walle
* Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-20 02:01]: It is possible that it could run later. But, I do know that there are at least a couple of these tables (on various arches) that we toss out of memory or become unavailable later in boot. I do this this: sysfs: add

Re: linux-next: Tree for July 18: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:2068 trace_hardirqs_on_caller

2008-07-20 Thread Bernhard Walle
* Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-20 15:03]: Because I didn't know that interface. And because I don't see that interface on my two systems that I just checked. i386 and x86-64. What do I have to do to enable that interface? That interface depends on CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. But