On 11/05/14 08:34, joaoandrefe...@sapo.pt wrote:
Citando George Anzinger geo...@wildturkeyranch.net:
On 10/31/14 11:06, joaoandrefe...@sapo.pt wrote:
Hello all,
Lately, I've been experimenting with KGDB to do some kernel debugging.
While doing this, a doubt arised while using the set
the system tables indicate is running.
Some of the registers you can change need to be handled VERY carefully
(eip or esp for example) or you could easily confuse the system as well.
--
George
I've been making these tests
after hitting a hardware breakpoint, then I set the values with e. g.
set $es
, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
--
George
On 09/22/2011 03:46 PM, Tim Bird was caught saying:
On 09/22/2011 01:34 PM, George Anzinger wrote:
I learned a long time ago that if you have to put special words in the
messages or the manual there is something wrong with the code.
Surely there is a way to poke through the write
I learned a long time ago that if you have to put special words in the
messages or the manual there is something wrong with the code.
Surely there is a way to poke through the write protection, after all
the kernel does.
--
George
On 09/21/2011 02:19 PM, Tim Bird was caught saying
his question?
Thanks!
--
Regards,
George
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/010691.html
[2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-March/011076.html
[3]
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h
would think the smp_mb() should be
in the while loop not prior to it.
--
George Anzinger geo...@wildturkeyranch.net
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling
that allows an unmodified gdb to do
the debugging.
I think a definition of terms might help here, i.e.:
debugger == gdb
debugger proxy == a program on the host system that splits terminal
traffic between a terminal program and gdb
but this may be in a prior part of the doc.
--
George
On 01/31/2008 01:36 AM, Jan Kiszka was caught saying:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
George Anzinger wrote:
On 01/30/2008 04:08 PM, Jan Kiszka was caught saying:
[Here comes a rebased version against latest x86/mm]
In case kgdbwait is passed as kernel parameter, KGDB tries to set up
and connect
- XML DocBook
so in general it's something like:
make htmldocs pdfdocs psdocs mandocs
to get multiple output formats
or just
make htmldocs
Umm and if I just want the kgdb documentation?
--
George
to get HTML output format.
Warning: pdfdocs and psdocs depend on some tools
, get beyond switch and all the timeout code.
You also need to make sure that the kernel will, sometime soon, switch to the
thread of interest. I.e. kgdb will NOT pull a program out of a suspend state
(at least not with out a bit of help from you).
--
George
Here is the register infor befor
Deepak Saxena wrote:
On Oct 12 2006, at 10:44, Kevin Hilman was caught saying:
Index: linux-2.6.18/lib/Kconfig.kgdb
===
--- linux-2.6.18.orig/lib/Kconfig.kgdb
+++ linux-2.6.18/lib/Kconfig.kgdb
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
config
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 19:30 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 15:37 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 02:07, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:30:11PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 12
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 15:37 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 02:07, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 02:30:11PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 12:17 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 08:46:20AM -0700, George
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:04 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 12:17 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
~
I didn't find the static init of the trap notify;
George
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 17:04 -0700, George Anzinger wrote:
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 12:17 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
~
I didn't find the static init of the trap notify;
George
Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:42:04PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
Ton, George, Amit, et. al:
If CONFIG_KGDB isn't defined, the kernel should be exactly the
same as when kgdb isn't integrated. So shouldn't we should add
#ifdef CONFIG_KGDB in the traps.c code where the traps
Piet Delaney wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 12:17 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
~
I didn't find the static init of the trap notify;
George: where is that?
Have a look here:
http://source.mvista.com/~ganzinger
with an always rule in the top level make file
(I am not saying this is the best way, but it worked that way when I first
put it together).
George
--
George Anzinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more
19 matches
Mail list logo
