Ingo Molnar wrote:
Just a first quick 30-seconds impression from skimming through the
patch:
- The cleanups are an absolute must before doing any in-depth
review. We only want to waste valuable review bandwidth on code
that at least _looks_ nice and tidy.
I think in depth review is
* Jason Wessel jason.wes...@windriver.com wrote:
This is an RFC patch. This work is by no means in its final form,
nor is it in a form that would be suitible for upstream merging.
This is an early prototype of a kdb frontend talking to a kgdb
backend. It is meant to foster some
