Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Jason Wessel wrote:
An RFC type patch follows which addresses the problem, but in my
opinion not in a terribly clean way... Perhaps other folks will
comment on a different or better way to approach the problem or chime
in on if it should be fixed
David Miller wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 23:14:23 +0200 (CEST)
Please use HW breakpoints in the test suite. The RFC patch looks
horrible :)
ftrace needs basically the same kind of facility as kgdb
needs here. So bypassing the need for kgdb won't
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Jason Wessel wrote:
An RFC type patch follows which addresses the problem, but in my
opinion not in a terribly clean way... Perhaps other folks will
comment on a different or better way to approach the problem or chime
in on if it should be fixed at all. Certainly the
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
2008/5/20 Jason Wessel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
Hi
I tried to run the latest git kernel and got the following error.
See an attachment for full dmesg.
kgdbts: ERROR PUT: end of test buffer on 'do_fork_test' line 5
expected OK got $E02#a7
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
Hi
I tried to run the latest git kernel and got the following error.
See an attachment for full dmesg.
kgdbts: ERROR PUT: end of test buffer on 'do_fork_test' line 5
expected OK got $E02#a7
[ cut here ]
WARNING: at
2008/5/20 Jason Wessel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexander Beregalov wrote:
Hi
I tried to run the latest git kernel and got the following error.
See an attachment for full dmesg.
kgdbts: ERROR PUT: end of test buffer on 'do_fork_test' line 5
expected OK got $E02#a7
[ cut here
[Added some CCs.]
On Friday, 9 of May 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
Hi
I tried to run the latest git kernel and got the following error.
See an attachment for full dmesg.
kgdbts: ERROR PUT: end of test buffer on 'do_fork_test' line 5
expected OK got $E02#a7
[ cut here
