Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Johannes Maibaum
Am Dienstag, dem 29.06.2021 um 10:53 -0400 schrieb Steven A. Falco: > For fun, I tried running through the README.md file. I hit a slight > snag in that the "flatpak install" prerequisite step failed with: > > error: No remote refs found similar to ‘flathub’ Good catch, MR merged, thanks,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Steven A. Falco
For fun, I tried running through the README.md file. I hit a slight snag in that the "flatpak install" prerequisite step failed with: error: No remote refs found similar to ‘flathub’ It is simple to correct; just run this command prior to the "flatpak install" step: flatpak remote-add

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Jon Evans
Hi Ruth, You can build the nightly flatpak (with wx 3.1) by grabbing this repository and following the instructions in the readme: https://gitlab.com/kicad/packaging/kicad-flatpak/kicad-nightly-flatpaks/kicad-nightly-flatpak Johannes can probably answer any detailed questions better than I, but

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Jeff Young
> I presume KiCad 6 will be released after wx 3.2 is released (stated by their > releases page as 'hopefully in September 2021’). No, we won’t be waiting on wxWidgets to release. (I suspect their date is optimistic.) Cheers, Jeff. > On 29 Jun 2021, at 14:14, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: > > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
On 29/06/2021 12:39, Jeff Young wrote: Windows and Mac are single platforms, so the KiCad team builds those. We also build the Linux flatpak, which is statically linked (to 3.1). Except that the flatpak I installed yesterday is of version 5.1.10 and that one at least is linked to wx 3.0.

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Jeff Young
Windows and Mac are single platforms, so the KiCad team builds those. We also build the Linux flatpak, which is statically linked (to 3.1). It’s all the Linux distros that we can’t do much about. > I'm not saying it's ideal to use the possibly broken -dev version of wx, but > IMO it is worse

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
wxwidget 3.1 is the development version for the upcoming stable version 3.2 which possible breaks the API/ABI with every new version that is getting released. That makes this software breaking other software too often and by this unfit to get introduced into Debian unstable, it simply make to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-29 Thread Jean-Samuel Reynaud
>> And the kicad built nightly v5.99 from >> http://ppa.launchpad.net/kicad/kicad-dev-nightly/ubuntu/ >> >> And it's v5.99 I was asking to include wx 3.1. > > I though we had changed our nightly Ubuntu builds over to 3.1 but > apparently not.  Maybe our PPA package dev can comment about what it >

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Carsten Schoenert
Hello Ruth, Am 28.06.21 um 21:34 schrieb Ruth Ivimey-Cook: > I would *really* appreciate an ubuntu "official" nightly build of 5.99 > that uses wx3.1 there was never and probably will never be any official Ubuntu KiCad packages. The "official Ubuntu" packages are taken from Debian by the

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 6/28/21 12:34 PM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote: I have v5.1 from http://ppa.launchpad.net/kicad/kicad-5.1-releases/ubuntu/ In the short term, we will probably continue to package 5.1 with wx 3.0. This is primarily to ensure that our python scripts aren't broken by Python 3 which is require

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
On 28/06/2021 20:28, Johannes Maibaum wrote: Running this with "flatpak run org.kicad.KiCad" runs the application, but the fonts problem (very small fonts for native wx widgets) is not resolved. We decided

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Johannes Maibaum
Hi Ruth, Am Montag, dem 28.06.2021 um 19:55 +0100 schrieb Ruth Ivimey-Cook: > I think the initial problem with flatpak was that I couldn't figure > out how to install kicad. Things like "flatpak search flathub KiCad" > don't return useful results. You can leave out the remote from flatpak search

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
Johannes, Thanks for asking... I think the initial problem with flatpak was that I couldn't figure out how to install kicad. Things like "flatpak search flathub KiCad" don't return useful results. However, I then found the problem with flatpak was that I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Johannes Maibaum
Hi Ruth, Am Montag, dem 28.06.2021 um 16:38 +0100 schrieb Ruth Ivimey-Cook: > I first tried to install the 'flatpak' build, but couldn't do so, so > then I compiled it from scratch. I maintain the KiCad flatpak manifests. Did you try to install the flatpak from flathub.org, i.e. flatpak

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
I compiled latest HEAD (master) from the gitlab repo, using dev packages as required (e.g. glew) from Kubuntu except for the wx 3.1 build, which came from https://repos.codelite.org/wx3.1.5/ubuntu/  (codelite maintain a set of builds of it for different distros). Ruth On 28/06/2021 16:53,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
I have v5.1 from http://ppa.launchpad.net/kicad/kicad-5.1-releases/ubuntu/ And the kicad built nightly v5.99 from http://ppa.launchpad.net/kicad/kicad-dev-nightly/ubuntu/ And it's v5.99 I was asking to include wx 3.1. Ruth On 28/06/2021 16:53, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Which version of KiCad

Re: [Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Which version of KiCad are you talking about, 5.1 or master? Where are you getting your Kubuntu KiCad package, Kubuntu or the KiCad PPA? The decision to build against wxWidgets 3.1 is up to the disto package developer if you are using the disto's package. On 6/28/21 11:38 AM, Ruth Ivimey-Cook

[Kicad-developers] Experience compiling latest HEAD

2021-06-28 Thread Ruth Ivimey-Cook
Folks, I'm using Kicad on Kubuntu 21.04 with a 4K screen, and experience the 'tiny fonts' problem on it. I got fed up with that a few days ago and noticed the recommendations that wxWin 3.1 fixes many issues. I first tried to install the 'flatpak' build, but couldn't do so, so then I