[Kicad-developers] Line drawing problem under OS X

2011-03-21 Thread Jerry Jacobs
Dear all, I figured out that kicad under OS X has problems with hairline drawing not only with the sheet frame. Also with the hairline width text in gerbview DCode circles and the sketch mode in pcbnew. I tried digging in the sourcecode for the penwidth but did not yet figured out where I need to

Re: [Kicad-developers] Crosscompilling again - no luck

2011-03-21 Thread Brian Sidebotham
2011/3/10 Milan Horák konfere...@1301.cz: Hi gentlemen, I'm trying again to crosscompile Kicad for Windows on Linux. My problem is, that cmake ends with wxWidgets bot found message. I ran cmake through strace but everything seems to be the right way. wx is 2.8.11, Kubuntu 10.10 What

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
1)) Wayne, Any problems changing: (visible YES) to [visible] Reasoning: I am looking for conciseness. This means having defaults do the right thing, most of the time, so that they can be omitted from the expression. My thinking for properties, is that most are not visible

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 03/21/2011 12:58 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: 1)) Wayne, Any problems changing: (visible YES) to [visible] Reasoning: I am looking for conciseness. This means having defaults do the right thing, most of the time, so that they can be omitted from the expression.

Re: [Kicad-developers] Compiling KiCAD release version March 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Am I missing something in the setup? \ CMake? ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help :

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 03/21/2011 12:58 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: 1)) Wayne, Any problems changing: (visible YES) to [visible] Reasoning: I am looking for conciseness. This means having defaults do the right thing, most of the time, so that they can be omitted from the expression.

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Nicolas Pinault
2) Jean-Pierre or anyone else, Anyone have and second thoughts on the need to continue with both a pin name AND a pin number, going forward? I cannot remember why we need both. Many chips have the same name for many pins (eg FPGA GND and VCCxxx). Nicolas

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 03/21/2011 02:02 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: Le 21/03/2011 18:58, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : 2) Jean-Pierre or anyone else, Anyone have and second thoughts on the need to continue with both a pin name AND a pin number, going forward? I cannot remember why we need

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 03/21/2011 02:14 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: On 3/21/2011 1:58 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: 1)) Wayne, Any problems changing: (visible YES) to [visible] Reasoning: I am looking for conciseness. This means having defaults do the right thing, most of the time, so that

Re: [Kicad-developers] Compiling KiCAD release version March 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Milind Gupta
Thanks for the reply. I did go through the CMAKE steps. I am following these steps: http://www.valvers.com/OpenHardware-KiCad But compilation gives these errors. Milind On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote: Am I missing something in the setup? \

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread jean-pierre charras
Le 21/03/2011 21:48, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : On 03/21/2011 02:02 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: Le 21/03/2011 18:58, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : 2) Jean-Pierre or anyone else, Anyone have and second thoughts on the need to continue with both a pin name AND a pin number, going

Re: [Kicad-developers] Compiling KiCAD release version March 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Milind Gupta
Sorry I am still lost. So are you suggesting not to use windows? On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote: On 03/21/2011 04:00 PM, Milind Gupta wrote: Thanks for the reply. I did go through the CMAKE steps. I am following these steps:

Re: [Kicad-developers] Compiling KiCAD release version March 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Brian Sidebotham
On 21 March 2011 21:00, Milind Gupta milind.gu...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the reply. I did go through the CMAKE steps. I am following these steps: http://www.valvers.com/OpenHardware-KiCad But compilation gives these errors. Milind Hi Milind, As they are my instructions (mainly so I

Re: [Kicad-developers] Crosscompilling again - no luck

2011-03-21 Thread Brian Sidebotham
Hi Milan, I think your problem probably lies with --enable-monolithic. Under a mingw32 build there is no way for cmake to detect what components of wxWidgets are available in a monolithic build. You can either change the cmake scripts to detect a monolithic build instead, or else disable

Re: [Kicad-developers] Compiling KiCAD release version March 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
On 03/21/2011 04:30 PM, Milind Gupta wrote: Sorry I am still lost. So are you suggesting not to use windows? The response was more general than your specific problem, and targeted at those developers who have the skills, time and desire to support Windows. Brian looks like uour guy. Brian,

Re: [Kicad-developers] Sweet parser

2011-03-21 Thread Dick Hollenbeck
Pin name is, in fact, actually a pin description, and currently is just a comment. About pin numbers (currently a 4 characters identifier) I believe an enhancement in Eeschema could be the support of pins having multiple pin numbers. I see 2 cases: -Power pins in large ICs: they

Re: [Kicad-developers] Compiling KiCAD release version March 2011

2011-03-21 Thread Milind Gupta
Thank you Brian and Dick, Sorry about my amateur questions. I did modify the setup.h file but did not recompile wxwidgets[?]. I thought it was an include file that works when I compile kicad. I will try again and will get back if I have a problem. Thank you very much. Milind On