On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Wayne Stambaugh stambau...@verizon.net wrote:
It looks good. It certainly is a huge improvement over the old dialog. Aside
from some minor alignment issues the only comment I have is what does the
Apply Settings button do? If it just copies the dialog settings
For me the dialog is very very good, and works as expected. Still the
issue remains that the dialog can't be closed with the window button and
the cancel button. I hacked a class function DIALOG_PLOT_BASE::OnQuit
with EndModal(0); and it worked. Maybe the virtual functions need be
implemented?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jerry Jacobs
xor.gate.engineer...@gmail.com wrote:
For me the dialog is very very good, and works as expected. Still the issue
remains that the dialog can't be closed with the window button and the
cancel button. I hacked a class function DIALOG_PLOT_BASE::OnQuit
Hello Marco,
I like it but it has still some issues with wxWidgets on Mac with
version 2.9.2 from svn (rev 66766).
I put a screenshot on my server over here:
http://kicad.xor-gate.org/screenshots/new-plot-screen-issues.png
The issues are the format frame, and the gerber options entries
Marco,
Now please realize that you have to make EVERYONE happy, even if they
disagree among themselves. :)
And no good deed goes unpunished. And the pay is low.
And coder decides. Because the pay is low.
Dick
___
Mailing list:
On 2/1/2011 6:15 PM, Marco Mattila wrote:
Now there should be a little something for everyone in the latest
revision. It was possible to make the plot dialog a little smaller by
getting rid of the radio buttons and moving the output directory field
(although I'm not sure it's in the right
Le 31/01/2011 21:55, Marco Mattila a écrit :
Jean-Pierre,
I have yet another suggestion for the layout of the plot dialog (see
attachment). The width would be the same as in your recent patch, but
the height would be smaller. What do you think?
marco
I like it!
--
Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
Le 29/01/2011 22:01, Marco Mattila a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Marco Mattilamarco...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been rearranging the plot dialog. The current status is shown in
the attachment. There should be enough room to add a checkbox for
marking the path relative.
On second
On 01/30/2011 07:20 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
Le 29/01/2011 22:01, Marco Mattila a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Marco Mattilamarco...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been rearranging the plot dialog. The current status is shown in
the attachment. There should be enough room to add a
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:20 PM, jean-pierre charras
jp.char...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Most of time plot subdirectory is a subdirectory of the current working
directory.
Mainly in this case (easy to detect), the stored path must be relative to
the CWD.
Do not forget the CWD can easily change for a
I will fix number 1. It is my problem anyway.
Dick
The null string output directory is fixed. You might still get the
exception reading the board file, but only until you save the board file
again. The desired content of the
board file with the null string output directory is now with
Marco,
I went back and took a look at your commit one last time, and I again want
to complement on your excellence. It is *extremely* good, nice looking work.
It is clear that your experience with C++ is substantial, and I appreciate
the degree to which you have been willing to conform to
Le 29/01/2011 15:33, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
Marco,
I went back and took a look at your commit one last time, and I again want
to complement on your excellence. It is *extremely* good, nice looking work.
It is clear that your experience with C++ is substantial, and I appreciate
the degree
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been rearranging the plot dialog. The current status is shown in
the attachment. There should be enough room to add a checkbox for
marking the path relative.
On second thought, it should be possible to infer from
I might even use a macro, not a function, and have it be a single character
macro name, like N(), TN(), GTN().
I also offer:
n()
which seems to get out of the way even less.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
Any complex string that is capable of having either whitespace or quotes
in it should be wrapped using
aFormatter-Quoted( CONV_TO_UTF8(blah) ).c_str(),
I'm working on this now. Should there be something like
if(
On 01/28/2011 11:18 AM, Marco Mattila wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
Any complex string that is capable of having either whitespace or quotes
in it should be wrapped using
aFormatter-Quoted( CONV_TO_UTF8(blah) ).c_str(),
I'm working on this
On 01/28/2011 01:18 PM, Marco Mattila wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
Having said that, then are you saying a string like this:
ABCD
On the way out, *before* quoting will be a problem? Will not come back in
via DSNLEXER? Have you verified
On 01/28/2011 11:18 AM, Marco Mattila wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
Any complex string that is capable of having either whitespace or quotes
in it should be wrapped using
aFormatter-Quoted( CONV_TO_UTF8(blah) ).c_str(),
I'm working on this
Very nice work. What you have for saving and loading seems future proof
now, i.e. context free.
Just some comments below, but I think you are already at 99% perfection.
=== modified file 'CMakeLists.txt'
-add_subdirectory(gerbview)
add_subdirectory(kicad)
add_subdirectory(pcbnew)
On 1/4/2011 10:31 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
The previous patch has a bug. It incorrectly complains about no layers
being selected. This patch works better.
marco
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
During previous discussions about subtracting
Damn. I always struggle the most with the comments for Doxygen...
I think that we may be able to get rid of the global variable. I'll
take a look. I'll fix the comments in the next patch, too.
marco
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Wayne Stambaugh stambau...@verizon.net wrote:
This is a nice
On 01/05/2011 07:47 AM, Marco Mattila wrote:
Damn. I always struggle the most with the comments for Doxygen...
I think that we may be able to get rid of the global variable. I'll
take a look. I'll fix the comments in the next patch, too.
marco
From a usability standpoint, i.e. user
From a usability standpoint, i.e. user experience, I have a concern about
saving the desired layers, as if I was only ever going to work on one board.
Now that you have a compact bitmap, would it make sense to prefix the Config
key for layers, with the boardname? Although this might
On 01/05/2011 09:10 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
From a usability standpoint, i.e. user experience, I have a concern about
saving the desired layers, as if I was only ever going to work on one board.
Now that you have a compact bitmap, would it make sense to prefix the Config
key for layers,
If you think that the plotting requirements vary from one project to
another (the number of needed technical layers maybe?), saving them
outside the config system makes sense. Since there can be multiple
boards in a project, maybe the SETUP section of a board file is the
correct place for this. I
On 01/05/2011 11:23 AM, Marco Mattila wrote:
If you think that the plotting requirements vary from one project to
another (the number of needed technical layers maybe?), saving them
outside the config system makes sense. Since there can be multiple
boards in a project, maybe the SETUP section
The previous patch has a bug. It incorrectly complains about no layers
being selected. This patch works better.
marco
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
During previous discussions about subtracting masks from silkscreen
layers when plotting
The previous patch has a bug. It incorrectly complains about no layers
being selected. This patch works better.
marco
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
During previous discussions about subtracting masks from silkscreen
layers when plotting gerbers,
Hi,
During previous discussions about subtracting masks from silkscreen
layers when plotting gerbers, Dick mentioned that saving plot settings
is not quite up to date. Currently some plot settings to be
saved/loaded are defined in pcbnew_config.cpp. However, that requires
that corresponding
30 matches
Mail list logo
