Hi Michael, we will look at it and get back to you shortly
Borislav
On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:17 PM, Michael Patek mpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a fresh install of the KIM platform running on a local computer, and
another install of KIM running on a remote server. I run the GATE GUI
can
have a short call.
Borislav Popov
head of semantic annotation and search
On Mar 13, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Naaman Musawwir naa...@truemeridian.com wrote:
In fact, we need to use it with French language. Can you point to some
French knowledge base that we can use/purchase with KIM?
Regards
Hi Lydia, i am forwarding this to the kim-discussion list.
Cheers
Borislav
On Mar 8, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Lydia Khelifa khelifaly...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
I'm PHD student at cnam paris and i'm using Kim to annotate semantically
coropora of documents.
I'm interresting in the way to export
Thanks Genesis,
i've posted the mail to the kim discussion. The registration takes some
time to be processed - that's the reason
thank you
borislav popov
head of semantic annotation and search
On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Onto Genesis wrote:
Hello,
I just registered myself. I
Сергей, this type of functionality is frequently requested. We are porting the
KIM UIs into a new framework e.g. check http://factforge.net/
On top of it we will provide kb editing at some point - but still not the case.
The other approach with a FOREST interface is to use the built-in
Hi Jingyu,
the kb you see in the demo is the result of a lot of automatic
annotation of news articles - in this way it is being enriched with new
entities and facts.
that's the reason.
b
On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Jingyu Wu wrote:
Hello,
i want to use the KIM knowledge base to
Hi Leen ,
the kim plugin is no longer supported
thank you
borislav
On Feb 24, 2011, at 11:09 AM, leen hashim wrote:
hi
i couldn't find the link to download kim plugin directly
tq
leen
___
Kim-discussion mailing list
Hi Naaman,
we still have not tried UMBEL 1.0 it is in our todo list when we have a
bit more free resources.
The default ontology used in KIM is PROTON. Philip will send instructions of
extending it or mapping it to another ontology.
The default versions of the KB is with the 40k
Hi Marvin,
Philip somebody else if necessary will look at your issue now.
b
On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:52 PM, Marvin Scaff wrote:
We have deployed kim-platform-3.0-RC4 on a ubuntu machine. Its web
client has been deployed on another machine under tomcat.
kim_connection.properties with
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:41 AM, Santiago Suarez wrote:
HI,
I am trying to perform semantic searches. I get entities, but there
are problems to get the documents with the method
DocumentQueryResult resDocuments = apiQuery.getDocumentIds (semQ).
GetReferringDocuments (); I always get zero
Dear Prof. Shirgave,
this is a configuration issue related to the path to your java
instance. But anyway, i am forwarding this to our kim-discussion form.
all the best
borislav
On Sep 16, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Suresh Shirgave wrote:
Dear Sir,
I am a researcher in web usage mining from India
Hi Marcus
this is for kim-discussion and this is where it is being forwarded.
you will get an answer soon
b
On Aug 27, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Marcus Vinícius de Lima wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to load the KIMSevice by RMI connection, but i'm getting
always the same error indicating that the
Dear all,
thanks for supporting our work during the years. As you may know few
weeks ago we have released KIM 3 - http://ontotext.com/kim
To meet high demand from partners and customers we have released the
3rd generation of KIM with incomplete system documentation and only a
startup
Hi Srecko
i am forwarding this to the kim-discussion mail list - where i am
sure you will get expert help
b
On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:59 AM, srecko joksimovic wrote:
Mr Borislav,
I saw your documentation, and I find it very helpful. Unfortunately,
I still have a problem. Maybe this is not a
Hi Fangkai,
until someone more knowledgeable shares his thoughts, take this:
- reading the index: this is a basic operation behind every search -
so yes.
- modify - yes on the granularity of documents, entities and
annotations. deeper manipulations of non-atomic artifacts are likely
Yes Yang - you can
go ahead and ask if you have issues
b
On Jun 18, 2010, at 10:29 PM, Yang Fangkai wrote:
Dear List,
It seems that the syntax of the KIM world KB is not strictly RDF.
Can I use RDF statement in KIM World KB? Thank you!
Fangkai
Hi Dave,
what you summarized is correct. On the other hand it is incomplete
and it is not easy to complete this list. The reason is that we
acquired basically every feature that GATE has, as it is embedded in
KIM and even provides the IDE along the normal KIM installation. On
the other
Right,
There are several ways to do this. The complication comes from the
fact that there is quite a lot of code, JAPEs and PRs in the default
IE app you use - so lots of things to take into account.
On the contains issue: yes - but not in the code you have - we do not
have a public
email system, and may record your emails.
British Telecommunications plc
Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
Registered in England no: 180
-Original Message-
From: borislav popov [mailto:borislav.po...@ontotext.com]
Sent: 20 July 2009 10:24
To: Duke,AK,Alistair,DER3 R
Begin forwarded message:
From: borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: October 30, 2008 12:17:13 PM GMT+02:00
To: sunny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], kim-discussion@ontotext.com
Subject: Re: Question about KIM
Hi Sunny,
i forwarded your mail to the kim-discussion mail list
Begin forwarded message:
From: borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: October 30, 2008 12:49:48 PM GMT+02:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: kim-discussion@ontotext.com
Subject: Re: [KIM-discussion] Cosine similarity to check web page
relevance
Zoran,
this mail somehow slipped through
of pages? Maybe it could be usefull in my research.
All the best,
Zoran
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From: borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [KIM-discussion] Cosine similarity to check web page
relevance
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: kim-discussion
and Regards
Mehnaz
2008/10/30 borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mehnaz,
what is going on - did you manage?
borislav
On Oct 6, 2008, at 12:10 PM, DanKo wrote:
Hi Mehnaz,
-- for the label of the property, just add this triple:
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/page http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema
enclosing the latest presentation on KIM which
we
recently used. You might find something useful for your presentation
there.
Do not hesitate to contact me if we could help you with it.
Regarding Oracle, I am CC-ing my colleague Borislav Popov who is the
Technical leader of KIM team
it badly now: we can discuss this option as well if this is
the situation – after reorganizing our team and assignments – it is possible
Pick up your favorite option
And have a great day!
borislav
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of borislav popov
Sent
Dear Claudia,
I did some research on your problem and the situation is not very
optimistic. It seems that Install Anywhere (what we use to build the
installers) doesn't work well with Fedora.
Here are some references:
Hi Alvaro,
As far as i understand the situation is that you are trying
to do this while KIM is running. If so, then yes you couldnt do that.
Anyway even if you succeed in this KIM wont reload automatically upon such
an event.
... Shutting down KIM and removing the folder, be
Hi Alan,
Sorry for the delay, but i have been on the road for some time and my
colleagues at the KIM team are not receiving [EMAIL PROTECTED];
I will ensure that someone looks at your issue tomorrow more
thoroughly. As initial input i would say:
The current public release of
to know if the document
is in the repository.
My question is, how I could know if it is in the repository, I
mean, using what method ??
Thank you again,
Alvaro
borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alvaro,
indeed it is boring to have duplications :)
The sync method
what the
issue could be)
borislav
borislav popov wrote:
Thank you Zoran,
this will make it easy for us to check and try to reproduce the
problem.
will get back to you soon
borislav
Zoran Jeremic wrote:
Hi Borislav,
Thank you for your help. Here are the information that you
I attached my source. The document I used for the example has a
tag 'TITLE', does Kim get the title from this tag or from where??
Thank you alot,
Alvaro
borislav popov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Alvaro,
in the system documentation available in your installation you find
Hello JongSu,
thanks for being interested in KIM.
I am forwarding your mail to the kim-discussion mailing list where you
will get answers.
If you consider using KIM at least for a little while i suggest you go
and subscribe to this list at :
http://www.ontotext.com/kim/mailing-lists-info.html
have
Dear Keith,
first: congratulations for going that far with KIM and thanks for
your interest.
You are absolutely right about the behaviour of KIM Gazetteer. This was
designed as a features but in this case emanates as a bug.
I would not like to bother you with tech-details but still - here is
Dear Leandro,
i have found out the reason for this malfunction and it is both a
feature and a bug (complex world).
Let me clarify how the semantic queries work when you require documents
as result.
The first thing happening after you execute the query is that all
entities matching the
34 matches
Mail list logo
