https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440018
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440111
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Please try to provide a better description. You say 5.0.6 works fine, and
5.1.2 shows some double entries - but it doesn't corrupt the file. Is this
just a display issue? Does this happen with already existing transaction
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440504
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Right click in the header row, and you will see the other available columns.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440504
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
Sorry - you are correct. I think the issue is that the securities tab just
refers to the underlying security, and not anything about any shares of that
security you may own. The equities tab is per investment account, an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395047
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
I think adding a header record, and assuring all rows have the same number of
fields (issues 1 and 2) is a wishlist, not a bug. "Should" is not "must" in an
RFC, as far as I know. Issues 3 and 4 were fixed per the referenc
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440476
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440476
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440696
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Is it creating one new transaction with all the splits from the original
transaction, or is it actually creating one transaction for each split? (The
latter would be a bunch of unbalanced transaction, which makes it even mo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440645
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440645
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440800
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
Brendan,
On 2021.08.13 13:34, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
I am running a very recently compiled version of KMM from the git 5.1
branch on Fedora 34 using KDE / Xorg. AqBanking is version 6.2.9.0,
Gwenhywfar is version 5.6.0.0.
Until late last year, KMM worked well with USAA accounts
On 8/13/21 4:40 PM, Brendan Coupe via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
[snip...and sorry for any strange formatting, I'm not using my usual
email app]
I thought about that since importing CSV files from USAA into KMM is
annoying but it may not save me any time. I may give it a try.
I should have asked if
Have you set up ofx logging? That will show exactly what is being sent
as the request, and sometimes give a more useful error message than what
gets surfaced through the UI.
On 8/13/21 6:03 PM, Brendan Coupe wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 3:06 PM Jack via KMyMoney-devel
wrote:
On 8/13/21 4
M, Brendan Coupe wrote:
The ofx log shows the same info that's in the message box after it
fails to find any accounts:
Request unsuccessful. Incapsula incident ID: x
Brendan Coupe
Delta, it's not just a crappy airline
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:14 PM Jac
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=440800
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |NOT A BUG
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312649
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441324
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441322
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
Minor point - is there any possibility of updating to a more recent version of
KMM? You might consider an appimage, at least for testing.
https://kmymoney.org/appimage.html. I don't think it should matter in this
case, bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441322
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441581
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
It's easy enough to double (or triple?) click on the amount to select all of
it. Or else click at the beginning of the amount and drag to select all of it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441581
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
If you are saying the behavior changed, please be more specific, as I don't
recall any intentional changes in that area. However, that type of behavior is
more dependent on the underlying plasma and qt libraries than on KM
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
First, or those accounts which show this problem, do you actually see a
transaction in the ledger prior to the account opening date?
Next, when you reassign a split in one of these suspect transactions, is there
a correct
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441754
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Are you aware that you can edit multiple transactions at once? This has been
available for a long time. The request is still valid for other entities.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427541
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
CC||o
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428156
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
Is this still happening in 5.1.2? Also, what are the account types, both of
the chosen account and the one which actually gets the transaction? I do not
have this problem, and I import many accounts by OFX (usually direct
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441971
Bug ID: 441971
Summary: in the brokerage account ledger, the context menu is
not showing the investment account for dividend
transactions
Product: kmymoney
Version: 5.1.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441971
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Gentoo Packages
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
I just not
Just a minor issue, but are you using a ClientUID? I'm pretty sure
Chase requires one. I've been retrieving credit card transactions from
Chase for years.
Jack
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442174
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
If the report is HTML, then the underlining of links is (I believe) handled in
css, so it should be possible to add a separate bit of css for printing which
does not emphasize links in any way. Links are irrelevant (and pos
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442174
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Deactivate date link on |Do not highlight or
|reports
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438105
--- Comment #8 from jack ---
It would indeed be better to chop up the compound words as you suggest.
Thanks
Jack
On 10 Sep 2021, 14:46, at 14:46, Steve Allewell
wrote:
>https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438105
>
>Steve Allewell changed:
>
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438105
--- Comment #10 from jack ---
i can't help there... it's a problem.
fwiw, i can give you one of my mail sigs that illustrates this very
problem. i took it from from some microsoft spec years ago... i removed
some words in the middle, but this is the es
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428156
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
Does the problem happen with both direct-connect and importing downloaded OFX
files? If the bank offers to download MsMoney or QIF files, that should be
less work for you than using csv, until we figure out the underlying p
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428156
--- Comment #17 from Jack ---
ofxlog.txt only gets created when downloading with directconnect, not file
import, so there's no problem there.
Assuming you did not edit the kmm-statement extract, I'd say the two blanks
value of the accountnumber is th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442622
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Are you using xorg or Wayland? Can you try the other?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442665
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442991
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |wishlist
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
wishlist is how t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=442991
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
You did, and there is no reason to delete - it is a perfectly valid request. I
just changed the severity from "minor" to "wishlist" to indicate that.
If 5.0.8 is the most recent version of KMyMoney available on the latest
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443243
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443379
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326100
--- Comment #16 from Jack ---
Is this still happening? I have a vague memory of a change being made to
recognize duplicate transactions even if the institution is not correctly and
consistently identifying them.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422462
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.r.muel...@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Jack ---
***
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=431296
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438819
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422462
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adi@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Jack ---
*** Bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443550
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422462
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogerpack...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Jack ---
*
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422462
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Remember window |Remember window
|size/position for Upd
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443566
Bug ID: 443566
Summary: Make it easier for user to re-use existing security
when adding to new investment account
Product: kmymoney
Version: git (master)
Platform: Other
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326100
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326100
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net|
--- C
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326100
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443899
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422462
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bren...@coupeware.com
--- Comment #10 from Jack ---
***
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443551
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
I download all (or almost all) of my transactions using OFX direct connect, and
I still find reconciliation an absolutely necessary process. Not for all my
accounts, but for my investment accounts, the downloaded transactio
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426448
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Is this still an issue, or might it be covered by another open bug? Also, if
this is specific to Windows, should the title be changed to indicate that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378076
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133364
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.kde.org/show_b
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133364
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444555
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Severity|critical
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185570
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406936
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425169
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ostroffjh@users.sourceforge |
|.net|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432582
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444856
Bug ID: 444856
Summary: The New Account Wizard allows to not select a parent
account, and then presents an error
Product: kmymoney
Version: 5.1.2
Platform: Other
O
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443551
--- Comment #10 from Jack ---
Thomas changed the status to WAITINGFORINFO and nobody changed it back to
REPORTED, so it was automatically closed. I prefer to leave it closed and
leave the current behavior, If someone doesn't perform the reconciliation
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443551
--- Comment #12 from Jack ---
Patches gratefully accepted. I wouldn't object to this being done, but I
believe their are lots more important needs to be addressed by the limited
developer time available. Do you understand how this bug tracker works?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443551
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=443551
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REPORTED
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406936
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
This will automatically get closed soon as worksforme, and I think that's OK,
since changing account type works.
Changing account type does not change the position of the account in the
hierarchy, and it should not, in cas
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446370
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446202
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@lubich.com
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
*** Bu
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446202
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
Is someone actually looking at this and working on fixing the dependencies? I
don't want to push, but I want to be sure it hasn't just fallen into a black
hole.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352683
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432642
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432948
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
Summary|Funds and Bonds are wrongly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446680
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
Even stranger, if you go back to Configure and hit "Apply" (without changing
anything) the range has actually been changed to $106 to $1000, which you can
see if you go back to Configure again.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446566
--- Comment #5 from Jack ---
Please be a bit more specific about why you can't remove the tag. What happens
when you click on the "X" to the left of "mens undies"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444374
--- Comment #9 from Jack ---
It works fine for me under Artix Linux, a derivative of Arch Linux. I'd
suggest filing a bug against the Archlinux package.
What happens after you click OK on the dialog shown in the attachment of
Comment #5? I get a mess
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446990
--- Comment #1 from Jack ---
If, as I suspect, this is specific to Wayland, then I would clarify that in
they subject, and would guess that there is nothing the KMyMoney team can
directly do about it. Unfortunately, I'm not sure which component to repo
I just noticed that in the named report (both the default and any
limiting to fewer specific years) the columns always split years:
2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 .
In the Configuration/Range tab other than the default report, which
shows All dated, the range is fro 1/1 of some year to 12/31
On 12/15/21 11:08, Thomas Baumgart via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
Hi Jack,
On Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2021 00:33:02 CET Jack via KMyMoney-devel wrote:
I just noticed that in the named report (both the default and any
limiting to fewer specific years) the columns always split years:
2010/11 2011/12
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446819
--- Comment #2 from Jack ---
I see that commit went to master only. Will it get backported to 5.x or is it
only in the new ledger? Should the commit close the bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446566
--- Comment #10 from Jack ---
You didn't widen the column enough. If you make it even wider, the X for men's
undies should appear, where currently only the X for RBC MC is showing. The
down arrow lets you select additional tags. The text to the left
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446491
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446491
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446566
--- Comment #14 from Jack ---
*(&^&^( I wrote a whole reply, but got a "mid-air collision" and closed too
quickly before telling it to post anyway. So
I have been unable to replicate the issue, either with a version compiled from
git head of the 5.1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432642
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |REPORTED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446566
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446566
--- Comment #18 from Jack ---
I'll wait for one of the developers to chime in - but that does sound
reasonable. Disable OK on accepting a transaction if the split editor is
active - thus forcing an explicit accept or reject of any changes to the split
It seems that since converting the appimage builds to use Craft, they
have not completed a successful build. As I read the logs, it looks
like it's failing building deps, specifically when linking gwenhywfar.
The error I see is "/usr/bin/ld: cttest.o: undefined reference to
symbol 'libint
On 2021.12.30 03:58, Thomas Baumgart wrote:
On Donnerstag, 30. Dezember 2021 01:17:09 CET Jack via KMyMoney-devel
wrote:
It seems that since converting the appimage builds to use Craft,
they have not completed a successful build. As I read the logs, it
looks like it's failing bui
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428228
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Jack ---
I know it's late,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447733
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |wishlist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447734
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447735
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446990
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p.r.worr...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
***
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439289
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444374
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|REPORTED
1 - 100 of 979 matches
Mail list logo