I am repulsed by the content of this anti-semitic garbage. Why is this on
this list? I thought this list was at least leftist.
Jordana
>From: "Yuriy Kirienko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "The Grip \(E\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: "CFC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "The Theries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Sons of Liberty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Grom"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Father's Manifesto"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Christian Patriot"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "International Action Center"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Denman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "NCFC"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: The Grip - 55 (B) Kidnapping of Children by the American
>Judiciary. Why and How it Works
>Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:35:22 -0700
>
>Gentlemen,
>
>About a year passed since I posted this article. I think it is the
>time to repost it for the new subscribers to show the criminality
>of the judicial system of the US and its genocidal policy towards
>the White race, the White Man and the Father and Son.
>
>The place for the judicial bastards committing those crimes are
>not on the bench but in the gas chamber for the crimes against
>humanity that they routinely commit.
>
>Yuriy Kirienko
>
>
>
>The Grip - 55 (B) Kidnapping of Children by the American
>Judiciary. Why and How it Works.
>
>by Yuriy Kirienko
>
>The text follows after the table of contents.
>
>TABLE OF CONTENTS
>=================
>
>I. yk] Introduction.
>
>A-I. yk] Some of the Background.
>B-I. yk] Usurpation of My Fatherhood Rights by the Judge
>Roderick Duncan.
>
>1-BI. yk] Illegality of the Judicial Kidnapping.
>2-BI. yk] Criminal Executive Decision.
>
>II. yk] Judicial and Executive Modes.
>
>A-II. yk] Corruption of the Judicial Procedure.
>B-II. yk] Criminal as a Judicial Impersonator.
>C-II. yk] Experts of the Court as False Witnesses.
>D-II. yk] What Lawyers do in the Courts of Law?
>
>III. yk] Manipulations with Consciousness of the Victims.
>
>A-III. yk] Magic of the Judicial Show.
>B-III. yk] Conflict Between the Two Contexts.
>
>1-BIII. yk] The False Context of the "Politically Correct."
>2-BIII. yk] The Binding Power of the Context.
>3-BIII. yk] Peculiarity of the Legal Contest Within the
>False Context.
>
>C-III. yk] Hats the Attorneys Wear.
>
>1-CIII. yk] Context Determines the Color of the Hat.
>2-CIII. yk] American Coca Cola and Cola Loca on the
>Russian Easter.
>
>IV. yk] Human Intelligence and God.
>
>A-IV. yk] Nature of Proof.
>B-IV. yk] Can You Prove that You are not a Camel?
>
>1-BIV. yk] Description is not a Proof.
>2-BIV. yk] Self-evident Cannot be Proven.
>3-BIV. yk] What Cannot Prove that You are not a
>Camel?
>
>C-IV. yk] What You Can Prove Within the Context that
>Claims You being a Camel.
>D-IV. yk] A Jewish Created Context Enslaves Man, Aryan
>and the White Father to the Jew.
>
>1-DIV. yk] Man, Aryan and White Father are always
>Guilty.
>2-DIV. yk] Resetting of the Initial Values by the
>Politically Correct Context.
>
>a-2DIV. yk] Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad.
>b-2DIV. yk] Are Two Legs Bad or are Two Legs
>Better?
>c-2DIV. yk] The Context Created by the Pig
>determines Goodness or Badness of Two Legs.
>
>V. yk] Giving the Cart Blanch to the Judicial Will.
>
>A-V. yk] Judicial Decisions and the Penal Code.
>B-V. yk] Whitewashing of the Crime.
>
>1-BV. yk] Handling of Evidence by the American Judge.
>2-BV. yk] Judiciary Magic.
>3-BV. yk] Hiding the Origin of Criminal Intent.
>4-BV. yk] Blood Ties - Bonds, Whips and Carrots.
>
>a-4BV. yk] Power of the Blood Ties.
>b-4BV. yk] Usage of Blood Ties by the Jews.
>
>C-V. yk] Two Crimes at the Same Time.
>
>VI. yk] Summary of the Family Court swindle:
>
>A-VI. yk] The burden of proof placed upon the Father.
>B-VI. yk] Are You a Good Father?
>C-VI. yk] Are You a Stupid Father?
>D-VI. yk] Is Judge a Good Pimp?
>E-VI. yk] Lawyer - a Legal Representative of the Judge.
>F-VI. yk] Do not Endorse the Crime Against Yourself.
>
>VII. yk] Conclusion.
>
>A-VII. yk] Pimps Instead of Fathers in Gun Ownership.
>B-VII. yk] The Rotten Deeds of the Rotten Mob.
>
>1-BVII. yk] The State Mob does not Represent Fathers.
>2-BVII. yk] The State Mob Destroys Life in that Country.
>3-BVII. yk] Judicial Monsters Turned the State Power
>Against You.
>4-BVII. yk] You can entrust Nothing to the Sate
>Descretion.
>5-BVII. yk] Jews Plan to do What they Already did in
>Russia 1917.
>
>C-VII. yk] At Present Guns are Your Only Protection.
>
>=======================================
>
>KIDNAPPING OF MY CHILD.
>
>I. yk] Introduction.
>
>A-I. yk] Some of the Background.
>
>US Department of Justice
>
>Immigration and Naturalization Service
>
>Additional information on marital history of Yuriy E. Kirienko.
>
>This is an expanded version of the paper with the same title
>written as an address to the White American Male - the most
>downtrodden male in the history of the Aryan Civilization.
>
>1. Married to XXXXXXXX X. XXXXXXX, born citizen of the
>USA, on XX-XX-78 in the State of Illinois.
>
>2. Divorced by Superior Court of California - case No.;
>XXXXXX-X, on 5-31-1990.
>
>3. Child-son: XXXX XXXX XXXX born XXXX XX, 1980.
>XXXX has dual citizenship. On November 25, 1980 the
>General Consulate of the USSR in San Francisco issued to
>XXXX a Birth Certificate No.: XXXXXX of the USSR upon
>the written request of both parents.
>
>4. By the decision of the judge Roderick Duncan of the Su-
>perior Court of California, County of Alameda the child was
>kidnapped from his father on May 31, 1990.
>
>B-I. yk] Usurpation of My fatherhood Rights by the
>Judge Roderick Duncan.
>
>1-BI. yk] Illegality of the Judicial Kidnapping.
>
>01.yk] The judgment regarding my son was a legalized act
>of kidnapping for neither was it based on any factual evi-
>dence nor was it made according to the Laws of California.
>The decision of that judge either stemmed from conflict of his
>personal values with mine or was determined by the needs
>of the undeclared and illegal executive objectives. If his de-
>cision was dictated by his personal values, his interpreta-
>tions of what I told to my son are subjective and arbitrary and
>as such are not valid in California.
>
>2-BI. yk] Criminal Executive Decision.
>
>02.yk] If his decision was determined by the undeclared ob-
>jectives they aside of being criminal in itself (for what else
>could be the reasons for keeping them undisclosed) they
>change the mode of reasoning from the judicial to executive
>thus making the decision also illegal.
>
>II. yk] Judicial and Executive Modes.
>
>03.yk] In the judicial mode, the judge transforms the set of
>the facts of evidence into the decision of acting over them in
>a certain manner. At that, he must strictly follow the pre-
>scribed for that purpose set of instructions that are called
>laws. In the judicial mode, the outcome of a trial is a function
>of the initial evidence and before lawful arrival at the final
>decision it cannot be known neither to the judge nor to the
>officers of the court. In the executive mode, the process is
>reversed and the executive proceeds from the desired out-
>come to its necessary preconditions.
>
>04.yk] He orders his decision to execution after establishing
>to the best of his abilities that at their expansion in time to-
>wards the expected outcome all the intermediary events
>would stay within the frame of the law.
>
>A-II. yk] Corruption of the Judicial Procedure.
>
>05.yk] The errors of the judicial procedure may be of the
>three types. 1) Acceptance of appearances of things and
>events into the facts of evidence. 2) Misinterpretation of pub-
>lic policies and non-enforcement of the laws. 3) Switching
>the mode of the proceedings from the judicial to executive.
>The error of the third type is the most dangerous for it
>streamlines the first two points into the battle plan towards
>reaching illegally the criminal objective using the power of
>the legitimate state.
>
>06.yk] Such judicial "error" is always deliberate and turns
>every participant of the procedure into the willing or unwilling
>accomplices of the crime. The judge himself acting in
>such a mode is a judicial impersonator - a criminal, veil-
>ing himself into the garments of the judicial procedure
>and legalese to prevent disclosure of his true identity to
>the victimized litigants and attending spectators.
>
>B-II. yk] Criminal as a Judicial Impersonator.
>
>07.yk] Lack of the causal-consequential connection with the
>reality is the distinctive trait of the so run "judicial' procedure.
>In such a procedure, with a set executive goal, the functions
>of the thief in the judicial chair consist of deliberately commit-
>ting himself and allowing others to contribute in the first two
>errors. Functioning of the other, involved into such a ploy of-
>ficers of the court, is reoriented to convincing of the victims
>and the unsuspecting public that the judicial procedure is run
>in full faith and that the reached executive goal is, indeed, a
>judicial decision.
>
>08.yk] Under such conditions no facts of reality would be al-
>lowed to matter to the extent as to alter the "judicial' decision
>beyond the built in margin of error. Every trade has its tricks
>and a "judicial" thief with his accomplices can victimize plain
>public with impunity at no risk to themselves. There is no
>more secure place for a criminal than the judicial chair in the
>American court. As I believe H. Mencken put it in his "In De-
>fense of Women": a judge is a student who gives grades to
>himself.
>
>C-II. yk] Experts of the Court as False Witnesses.
>
>09.yk] The suite of the judge consists of such false wit-
>nesses, as often are the experts of the court. They testify in
>the name of some invisible entity to some often equally in-
>visible and irreproducible effect. Among them, the social
>workers and psychologists are the most prominent liars
>since 99% of their testimonies in court is nothing but pseudo-
>scientific rigmarole called upon to prove the "judge" right.
>They are spokesmen for the idols as they were at the days
>of the old. In those days, they existed under differently
>sounding names such as soothsayers, necromancers, star-
>gazers and other oracles and mouthpieces of the unknown.
>
>10.yk] However, it is doubtful that they could influence the
>judicial procedure to any significant extent. In former days,
>they were not allowed to testify and often were prosecuted
>as charlatans and liars. Due to the advances of science in
>the course of the last century people without special educa-
>tion began to view everything called scientific with respect
>and awe while everything described in a specialized and
>non-understandable for them jargon - as scientific. For so
>brainwashed people chanting of the sorcerers and shamans
>acquires the same testimonial value once they do it in the
>language the litigants do not understand.
>
>D-II. yk] What Lawyers do in the Courts of Law?
>
>11.yk] The suit of the judge also consists of lawyers em-
>ployed by the court system under the pretext of knowing the
>intricacies of the judicial procedure and pertinent laws. Sup-
>posedly, that knowledge allows them to present to the judge
>the truth of the matter with clarity and precision far beyond
>and above such capacity of the litigants themselves.
>
>12.yk] Were that truth actually existing aside from the facts
>of evidence the lawyers of the involved parties would have
>sought to converge upon it. It would not have been, then, a
>question of whose lawyer is better and fees higher. Were
>that truth non-existent the lawyers would have nothing to
>search for to present it to the judge. So, what than lawyers
>do in the courthouse?
>
>III. yk] Manipulations with Consciousness
>of the Victims.
>
>13.yk] One and the same glass may be half-full and half-
>empty. Depending on the context the client chooses to view
>it, the contents of the glass may appear for his conscious-
>ness growing or diminishing. Creating the context in which
>the client sees that glass the attorney invokes an illusory
>sensation of gain or loss in his mind.
>
>14.yk] The purpose of manipulating consciousness of
>the client is in compelling him to err in his judgment,
>taking his loss for a gain. That error of judgment delib-
>erately prompted by the attorney is configured to fit the
>preconceived decision of the judge making his illegal
>and criminal executive decision to appear judicial and
>lawful.
>
>15.yk] Such manipulations with consciousness of a victim
>lay at the foundation of the fraud commonly used in the judi-
>cial practice of the USA. Producing a judicial fiction lawyers
>and judges deliberately distort the information they bring into
>the focus of the litigants' attention. The science fiction uses
>false assumptions, hypothetical evidence and non-proven to
>exist laws of nature stimulating the creativity of the consumer
>for the purposes of entertainment.
>
>A-III. yk] Magic of the Judicial Show.
>
>16.yk] In contrast to the science fiction, the judicial fiction
>uses the false facts, that have been illegally, deliberately and
>criminally accepted into the evidence by the judge, and mis-
>interprets the laws and public policy to reach the precon-
>ceived by that judge executive objectives. It so affects the
>human consciousness that instead of the criminal reality the
>victim "sees" non-real images of justice that are existing only
>in his consciousness.
>
>17.yk] Because those images do not originate in the con-
>texts of the reality to which the litigants belong, they cannot
>be debunked with the facts of that reality taken out of its con-
>text. That is even if the lawyer would have agreed to bring
>them to the attention of the judge and the judge would have
>allowed the arguments that use them to be heard. Appear-
>ance of the invulnerability of the judicial criminals stands on
>the mismatch between the imaginary and real contexts.
>
>B-III. yk] Conflict Between the Two Contexts.
>
>1-BIII. yk] The False Context of the "Politically Cor-
>rect."
>
>18.yk] The imaginary context is prompted up by the non-
>imaginary, real but clandestine, criminal agenda. That con-
>text is termed with an absurd label of the "Politically Correct."
>Several professionals experienced in playing the con game
>of that type do the job as do several thieves playing on one
>hand the card games in the Russian trains. At the same time
>the context stemming from the reality of the non-restricted
>natural life is neither articulated nor presented in the court-
>room at all.
>
>19.yk] Several people conceding to it or agreeing upon it
>emotionally can maintain any context. A context can be cre-
>ated and maintained also by a strong-willed individual
>blessed with an unusual insight and capable of imprinting it
>upon others thus opening their eyes towards the truth. A
>regular litigant cannot do that.
>
>2-BIII. yk] The Binding Power of the Context.
>
>20.yk] A child learns the definition of the words by the con-
>texts in which they are being used and by the emotions con-
>veyed upon them by the adult talkers whom he trusts. That is
>how the culture is being learnt. The falsely accused litigant
>"learns" the new definition of words as it follows from the
>imaginary context created for him by the attorneys. That con-
>text is the policy to "win the case" and is also maintained by
>other officers of the court playing their con game in their in-
>dividual capacities.
>
>21.yk] A false context can be debunked only as a whole.
>Every attempt to prove it wrong by using words defined by
>another context leads to endless word-mincing, endless re-
>definition of the words and endless descriptions of the self-
>evident that logically does not converge to the sought for
>truth. Attorneys have been creating the false contexts by
>misrepresenting the reality for many decades in order to en-
>slave fathers and bind them by the "moral obligations" to-
>wards their enslavers - Jews, whores and their servants.
>3-BIII. yk] Peculiarity of the Legal Contest Within the
>False Context.
>
>22.yk] The context created by the attorneys is a sub-
>context of the general context of the class of cases where
>the moral guilt of the falsely accused is already built in. The
>task of the judicial show of the Unite States is limited to the
>policies of winning the cases by exacerbating or mitigating
>the non-existent built in moral debt of all, mostly White fa-
>thers, to maximize the profits in the long run.
>
>23.yk] The contexts created during those shows are in con-
>tradiction to the context of the natural, not bound by the spi-
>der-web of the restraining laws created by the legal swin-
>dlers, free life. The conceptual definitions of the words that
>follow from the context of the free life are not the same as
>the definitions given to the same words by the legal criminals
>in the context of the litigation.
>
>C-III. yk] Hats the Attorneys Wear.
>
>1-CIII. yk] Context Determines the Color of the Hat.
>
>24.yk] The colors of the hats that the American lawyers
>dawn upon themselves before the trial do not change the na-
>ture of their activity. Black or white hats remain purely the
>decorations of the criminal legal clowns. They make the
>scripts of their roles appear malevolent or benevolent for the
>course of truth depicted in the show their play. Yet they still
>retain their fictitious and therefore always malevolent charac-
>ter outside its legal context for the truth defined by the real
>life.
>
>2-CIII. yk] American Coca Cola and Cola Loca on the
>Russian Easter.
>
>25.yk] On the Easter night in Russia of the 50s, they were
>showing in all the movie theaters near you all night long a
>Czechoslovakian movie called the "Lemonade Joe". It pic-
>tured a 19th century American town with two bars located
>across the street from one another. In the evil bar, the
>whores danced Can-Can wearing the black skirts, garter
>belts and stocking while in the virtuous bar all their three part
>suits were white in color. The virtuous whores dressed in all
>white treated customers with Coca Cola while the evil ones
>dressed in all black served American cowboys with Cola
>Loca brew that look and tasted just the same.
>
>IV. yk] Human Intelligence and God.
>
>26.yk] Advanced technology of the contemporary society
>calls forth the people whose training in exact natural sci-
>ences precludes pulling wool over their eyes. If you want to
>make a rocket fly, you must know for sure that what you see
>is real rather than imaginary. An effect is called true if it is
>self-evident and could be reproduced at will of the experi-
>menter anywhere on Earth under the same conditions at any
>time.
>
>A-IV. yk] Nature of Proof.
>
>27.yk] To be self-evident means that the existence of the
>object or the effect (an object differs from an effect merely in
>that its causes are beyond the capacity of the experimenter
>to discern and register and thus they remain unknown) could
>be experienced directly. Their existence requires no further
>proofs nor could principally be proven to exist by describing
>known to exist nearest to them "true" points of reference for
>"true" again means the self-evident.
>
>28.yk] Upon ascertaining its existence as to a fact it could
>be used as a true point of reference for further reductions or
>induction to other currently non-self-evident yet entities and
>effects and could also be used for their description.
>
>29.yk] Description of the non-self-evident cannot prove its
>existence unless it was conclusively proven that at least one
>of the true reference points used in its description is an im-
>mediate cause of that effect. The nature of a proof consists
>of bringing such points to the forefront and is the opposite of
>the process that merely describes it. The description alone,
>and especially endlessly expanded description, hides the
>needle of the "cause" in the stack of hay as does the cloud of
>drones accompanying the warhead.
>
>B-IV. yk] Can You Prove that You are not a
>Camel?
>
>1-BIV. yk] Description is not a Proof.
>
>30.yk] A description does not converge to truth and thus
>not being a proof, no matter how long it may be, it is a proc-
>ess without a determined end. In Russia in such circum-
>stances, they say about the judiciary: "Try to prove to them
>that you are not a camel." However, the proof converging to
>truth is always finite and its brevity depends upon the fore-
>sight and intellectual acuteness of the observer. The task of
>refuting the self-evidently false is impossibility because it
>proves itself false already. It means that there are no other
>shorter passes to any other points of self-evident than itself.
>2-BIV. yk] Self-evident Cannot be Proven.
>
>31.yk] It flags the breach in logic of assuming the hypothe-
>sis of the self-evident being non-self-evident at the same
>time. The black board is black because it is black. The black
>board is not white because it is black. Self-evident cannot be
>proven to be self-evident by negation of what it is not. It can-
>not be proven by the endless repetition of the same descrip-
>tion. The Black board is black because the black board is
>black and because the black board is black does not add
>anything to the fist statement of its self-evident blackness.
>
>3-BIV. yk] What Cannot Prove that You are not a
>Camel?
>
>32.yk] That means that if the legal context claims you to be
>a camel you cannot prove yourself not to be one by stating
>that 1) you are not a duck, that you are not a dog, that you
>are not a cat and you are not a camel because you do not
>have two humps and hooves. You cannot prove yourself not
>to be a camel 2) by stating endlessly that you are not a
>camel, that you are not a camel and that you are not a
>camel. You cannot prove yourself not to be a camel by 3) the
>endless repetition of the description of the self-evident. That
>is you cannot prove yourself not to be a camel by repeating
>that you are a man, that you are a man, and that you are a
>man.
>
>C-IV. yk] What You Can Prove Within the Context
>that Claims You being a Camel.
>
>33.yk] When the context defines you as being a camel,
>then within that context you can prove yourself only to be a
>camel to a degree - more or less. You must debunk the
>whole context as a fraud upon a court and draw a new con-
>text in order to become yourself and to demonstrate - not to
>prove - what is the self-evident. That new context should
>identify the culprits and give them a new definition defining
>also their new treatment and punishment for the fraud upon
>the court. A Russian saying says: "A stuck wedge should be
>knocked out with another wedge." The "Naturally Correct"
>context defined by the real life should destroy the "Politically
>Correct" context created by the Jewish thieves.
>
>D-IV. yk] A Jewish Created Context Enslaves
>Man, Aryan and the White Father to the Jew.
>
>1-DIV. yk] Man, Aryan and White Father are always
>Guilty.
>
>34.yk] The criminal clowns, passing themselves for the at-
>torneys representing truth of that life, created the contexts in
>which Man, Aryan, White Father are always morally guilty in
>front of the rest of the colored humanity including Jews and
>Women. That is the context in which the White Father owes
>them all a moral debt that can be reimbursed only though his
>life-long enslavement working to the best of his abilities. That
>fraudulent proposition assumes that within that context a Fa-
>ther can no longer talk from the name of authority and on
>behalf of anyone any longer.
>
>2-DIV. yk] Resetting of the Initial Values by the Politi-
>cally Correct Context.
>
>35.yk] That context also presumes that only the judicial
>Pimp presiding in the court can talk in the name of truth,
>God, Father's own children and his wife. And above all, that
>context defines the Jew as the eternal sufferer of the injus-
>tice for whom the whole world owes compensation through
>self-debasement, self-enslavement and not resistance to the
>Jewish lies, marauding, rape of the Aryan men and murder
>of the innocent. Those who dare to resists that artificially
>created criminal context are immediately assaulted by the
>Jewish gang and their accomplices - Whores, Homosexuals
>and Racial minorities, in whose name the same Jews usually
>talk as well.
>
>a-2DIV. yk] Four Legs Good, Two Legs Bad.
>
>36.yk] Jewish call them names colored by the context in
>negative emotions and prosecute them for that color they
>themselves created and painted them with. The inexperience
>individuals, mostly the Christian Sheeple of the Western
>brand, constitute the greatest majority of all falsely accused.
>Sheeple of the "Beasts of England" from the "Animal Farm"
>of Orwell also had an old song that they all knew: "Four legs
>good, two legs bad." They kept repeating it when they
>wanted to say something.
>
>b-2DIV. yk] Are Two Legs Bad or are Two Legs Better?
>
>37.yk] When the pig talking in their name changed the
>ending they loved the new song even better and began re-
>peating it with an equal gusto "Four legs good, two legs bet-
>ter." Having to prove black being truly black and seeing no
>way out of the frustration the sheeple resort to endless repe-
>tition of what they see. They try to "trick" the judge into be-
>lieving their words. They do not realize that "tricking" that
>they call "convincing of the judge" cannot prove anything for
>two reasons:
>
>c-2DIV. yk] The Context Created by the Pig determines
>Goodness or Badness of Two Legs.
>
>38.yk] 1) What they say does not have its origin in the self-
>evident objectively existing facts or logic of the proof. 2) It
>stays beyond their comprehension that the false charges
>against them do not stem from the misconceptions of the re-
>ality or false interpretation of the truth by the presiding judge.
>They stem from the free will of that judge. That his free will
>that deliberately allows existence of the false context leading
>to their enslavement through the false charges.
>
>V. yk] Giving the Cart Blanch to the Judi-
>cial Will.
>
>39.yk] That fact that their "proof" has no logically deter-
>mined end leaves the energy, the time and the expense in-
>volved to the discretion of the judge. Since the ill-perceived
>logic of such "proof" does not compel the judge to act, his
>decisions are triggered by the considerations of his free will
>rather than the law and the need to pursue the truth. The
>judge can grant himself "being convinced" at any time at his
>will when he feels that the conditions that he set for the ac-
>cused have been fulfilled.
>
>A-V. yk] Judicial Decisions and the Penal Code.
>
>40.yk] The Penal Code defines fulfillment of the decisions
>set as a precondition for relieving the distress imposed by
>the judicial impersonator as an extortion of a ransom. That
>ransom also includes the condition of acceptance of the
>crimes under a false name. That by itself creates a special
>case of the judicial extortion. Coercing the victim into accep-
>tance of the false labels for the true names of the judiciary
>deeds relieve the torment of their victims. Yet it also extorts
>a statement from the victim that no crimes against his chil-
>dren or himself have been committed.
>
>B-V. yk] Whitewashing of the Crime.
>
>41.yk] Such whitewashing of a crime allows the judiciary
>the commission of the most horrible offenses with impunity.
>It not only erases the records of the crime from the judicial
>archives but it also blots it out from the victim's conscious-
>ness thus wiping it out of his memory.
>
>1-BV. yk] Handling of Evidence by the American
>Judge.
>
>42.yk] In the American court, the facts of evidence have no
>independent of the whims of the judiciary existence. The evi-
>dence is tailored and the laws "interpreted" to achieve unlaw-
>fully the preconceived criminal executive objective passed
>for the judicial decision. - Such a decision that has been
>lawfully arrived at from the true facts of evidence by re-
>fracting them through the pertinent laws unto the plane of ju-
>dicial decisions.
>
>2-BV. yk] Judiciary Magic.
>
>43.yk] Dressing an executive decision in the judicial garb is
>an effective means of hiding behind the impartiality and
>blindness of Law both the spirit and the agents of the crimi-
>nal agenda. Injustice of the pseudo-judicial executive deci-
>sion sank into the judicial discretion in the production of evi-
>dence and interpretation of the laws and public policies
>makes it to disappear. That magic makes it reappear as
>stemming from the controversy intrinsic to the issues rather
>than from the illegal executive intent - intrinsic to the criminal
>activity of the judiciary.
>
>3-BV. yk] Hiding the Origin of Criminal Intent.
>
>44.yk] Hiding the origin of the criminal intent by assigning it
>to the causes independent of the will of the originator of the
>crime lies at the foundation of all high-level criminal activity.
>That is the reason why in the US courts the evidence is arti-
>ficially generated by 1) the redefined by the "politically cor-
>rect" contexts and 2) false testimony of the "experts" de-
>clared from the authoritatively sounding names of the idols.
>Crime is a rape of the creative will of its victim by the con-
>sumptive will of its proponent by the definition. Identification
>of the criminal will's true origin could turn the criminals into
>the target of retaliation of its victim.
>
>4-BV. yk] Blood Ties - Bonds, Whips and Carrots.
>
>a-4BV. yk] Power of the Blood Ties.
>
>45.yk] Jews ban investigation of the ethnic origin of the
>"Italian" and "Russian" mafia in America by the non-Jews
>because that mafia is nearly entirely Jewish and is under
>complete Jewish control. Such an investigation would have
>revealed that truth and showed that the Jews are slurring
>names of the Italians and Russians nations with their own
>criminal activity.
>
>46.yk] Blood ties are the strongest factor influencing peo-
>ple's behavior and will. In the old days the first child in each
>family of the tribe was the child of a chieftain. The exchange
>of the leaders between the Vanir and Aesir secured truth be-
>tween the Gods. Intermarriages between the royal families
>were the most powerful factors in the questions of war in
>peace in Europe.
>
>b-4BV. yk] Usage of Blood Ties by the Jews.
>
>47.yk] Putting the Jewesses under every men of signifi-
>cance in Germany and the Soviet Union allowed Jews to at-
>tach themselves to the genetically degenerate fringes of the
>upper class of Germany and Russia. That was instrumental
>for the destruction of national power in both societies. Hos-
>tage-taking by the Jews and Germans from the Russian
>population or threats of the mass reprisal on the defenseless
>civilians was instrumental for retaining of their power in Rus-
>sia. Kidnapping of children from their fathers is the most
>powerful factor in destruction of the White race and the en-
>slavement of the White fathers to the Jews.
>
>C-V. yk] Two Crimes at the Same Time.
>
>48.yk] Consequently, it is the children who are removed in
>the name "of their own best interests" from the fathers to
>force them into compliance with the Jewish will that controls
>the US courts. It is beyond the resolution of the victim's mind
>to see two crimes in progress at same time when that hap-
>pens. They are 1) acceptance by the judge of the false evi-
>dence and 2) the whitewashing of the crime by forcing its
>acceptance under the inappropriate fictitious name.
>
>VI. yk] Summary of the Family Court swin-
>dle:
>
>A-VI. yk] The burden of proof placed upon the Fa-
>ther.
>
>49.yk] The context that the Family Court imposes upon the
>father requires the father to prove to the judge that "it is in
>the best interests of his children" to be returned to their fa-
>ther. It is assumed that he should be a "good" father in order
>for the judge to make such a decision. The truth, however, is
>that it is self-evident that children should be with their father.
>That is only when it is proven that their father is "very very
>bad" father that the children could be removed from him as
>an exception from the rule.
>
>B-VI. yk] Are You a Good Father?
>
>50.yk] To be a "good" father means to be innocent from
>the implied charge of being "not good enough." The inno-
>cence cannot be proven because there is no such a thing as
>the facts of innocence. There is no such a thing as "not-so-
>good," "half-good," very good or an excellent father. There is
>no definition of the "Best Interests of the Children" other than
>how they are defined by their father. Their interests are to be
>in the image of their father or better as he finds it fit accord-
>ing to his values. Because that is self-evident it cannot be
>proven but can only be described . or stated and enforced.
>
>C-VI. yk] Are You a Stupid Father?
>
>51.yk] A regular American father has no understanding of
>the intricacies of the swindle played in the American Family
>court. He complies with the judge's wishes. He endlessly de-
>scribes that he is a good father, he is good father and he is a
>good father without proving anything by those repetitions. He
>also fulfils all the demands that the judge illegally places
>upon him. When the judge is "convinced" that his conditions
>are met, he may do what he has promised to the father and
>allow him to see his children.
>
>D-VI. yk] Is Judge a Good Pimp?
>
>52.yk] The point, however, is that "convinced" pertains to
>the judge's state of mind while the term "proved" pertains to
>the logic of the contested truth. A victim erroneously thinks
>that by "convincing" the judge he proves to the judge himself
>being right. The significance of the swindle is in that the
>judge may say that he is convinced at any time he pleases. -
>The defendant's labor of "proof" has no bearing on that for
>he only describes what is self-evident already and does not
>prove anything at all.
>
>E-VI. yk] Lawyer - a Legal Representative of the
>Judge.
>
>53.yk] Without being openly stated it nevertheless is clearly
>implied that part of the "convincing" of the judge consists of
>the victim's consent that no crime has been committed
>against him. To make sure that the defendant succeeds in
>"convincing" the judge quickly enough his lawyer explains to
>his client how the courts "generally" view such cases. That
>means that the victim would do whatever judge wants him to
>without the judge saying it himself.
>
>F-VI. yk] Do not Endorse the Crime Against Your-
>self.
>
>54.yk] The lawyer promoting the interests of the judges at
>his clients expense misrepresents the client to the judge ac-
>cording to the judicial wishes. The better he does the job the
>higher is his pay and standing in the court. When the judge
>becomes "convinced" that the father is broken in and is a
>good slave he would return what was his own to the father
>as a reward. He would return it under a different name. By its
>acceptance the father endorses that crime by admitting that
>it has never been committed.
>
>VII. yk] Conclusion.
>
>A-VII. yk] Pimps Instead of Fathers in Gun Own-
>ership.
>
>"Senate bill requires firearm registration
>Mandates universal gun licenses featuring photo, personal
>info
>
>A bill introduced in the U.S. Senate would require all firearms
>to be registered and mandate the creation of a record of sale
>for virtually every firearm sold in the U.S."[ 1]
>
>B-VII. yk] The Rotten Deeds of the Rotten Mob.
>
>1-BVII. yk] The State Mob does not Represent Fa-
>thers.
>
>55.yk] Gentlemen! The US states institutions including
>Federal Government, Senate and Police during the last dec-
>ades demonstrated more than convincingly that they do not
>represent White fathers of the US. They are selfish faceless
>mediocrity completely under the control of the Jewish mob
>operating from behind the scene.
>
>2-BVII. yk] The State Mob Destroys Life in that Coun-
>try.
>
>56.yk] They stole power from the people of that country and
>conspire to kill off the White race by degrading and destroy-
>ing their fathers and sons while turning their mothers into
>whores. There is no harder crime of a larger magnitude than
>that that has ever been attempted to be committed on that
>earth against the humanity.
>
>3-BVII. yk] Judicial Monsters Turned the State Power
>Against You.
>
>57.yk] That paper showed criminality of the judicial institu-
>tion of the US to whom American people entrusted the ob-
>servance of the law, protection of their fundamental inter-
>ests, life of their children and their future. Your trust has
>been betrayed and the judicial monsters turned the entrusted
>to them power against you.
>
>4-BVII. yk] You can entrust Nothing to the Sate De-
>scretion.
>
>58.yk] You can no longer entrust anything to their discretion
>because not only they failed in every aspect of their respon-
>sibilities but they directly seek your degradation and murder.
>The guns at that point are the only protection that you have
>against that subhuman slime.
>
>5-BVII. yk] Jews Plan to do What they Already did in
>Russia 1917.
>
>59.yk] As they kidnap and destroy your children in their
>own best interest they would confiscate your guns from any-
>one who would resist their crimes. They would do it under
>any pretext making it the part of the context of the "Politically
>Correct." You must remember the mass slaughter that fol-
>lowed when Jews confiscated guns in Russia in 1917. From
>1917-1924 30 millions Russians were slaughtered.
>
>C-VII. yk] At Present Guns are Your Only Protec-
>tion.
>
>60.yk] The fathers of your country gave you the right to
>bear guns precisely for that purpose of resisting the scum
>like they. You must deny them and their Jewish masters the
>authority to make any decisions in that regard and refuse to
>obey the laws of their making. At that period of history you
>are devoid of any protection by the state. - Quite to the con-
>trary the state became your deadliest enemy. Before you
>can successfully reorganize into a new power representing
>your interests your guns are the only protection that you
>have that could hold the bastards in check.
>
>61.yk] Yuriy Kirienko
>
>===========================================
>Endnotes:
>
>[ 1] Jon E. Dougherty, SENATE BILL REQUIRES FIREARM
>REGISTRATION S2525 FEINSTEIN, The Grip - Archibald
>Bard [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Thu 9/14/00 10:09 AM
>
>Long Live Odin! The Aryan Christ of the Second Coming.
>
>
>
>http://i.am/grom
>
>That site can be viewed the best in Explorer. Russian resistence music with
>simultaneous translation can be listened to only in Explorer. Due to memory
>limitation I will keep on the site no more than three songs changing them
>from time to time.
>
>Addresses:
>
>Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>List owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/grom
>
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
