Re: Public notification: was Re: Server quote

2007-02-18 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Neil Schneider wrote: Andrew Lentvorski wrote: James G. Sack (jim) wrote: I have a strong bad feeling about making the expenditure (of such a large fraction of our treasury) without general-group notification and allowing some reaction time. I think I agree. Notifying the group at a

Re: Public notification: was Re: Server quote

2007-02-18 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Richard W. Ernst wrote: .. I would suggest that the function of this steering list be advertised on the general list(s?), as well as at the meetings. Good reminder. ..j -- KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Re: Server quote

2007-02-18 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
Neil Schneider wrote: I suggest we come to a consensus first. Do we use the $1920 version or the $2500 version? The 2500$ version. -john -- KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer

Re: Server software planning [was Re: Server quote]

2007-02-18 Thread Andrew Lentvorski
John H. Robinson, IV wrote: Andrew Lentvorski wrote: CentOS:RHEL :: Fedora:RedHat No. CentOS is the RHEL sources recompiled. That's all. The closest SAT-style analogy I can come up with . . . CentOS:RHEL :: WhiteBox::RHEL It is a completely crappy anaology, but that is the only thing