Joshua Penix wrote:
So the part that applies to our situation and explains RR's mail
rejection is RFC 1912 part 2.1 which says, For every IP address,
there should be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain.
Note the should. I also contend that RFC 1912 fails to add something to
Neil Schneider wrote:
We're also running low on disk space. I did a little house cleaning and got
the freespace above 10%, but I see that the majority of the space taken on the
disk is by two instances of zope zope2.7 and zope2.8 . I don't know which is
which, but someone should remove the
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Neil Schneider wrote:
It's now Sunday night. No volunteer has stepped up to present, and Thursday
is
only 4 days away. What to do?
How about an interactive panel on command line use. Get 2-4 panelists
and one good keyboarder (to demonstrate ad-hoc topics).
Joshua Penix wrote:
On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Neil Schneider wrote:
I just updated DNS to add newspark. So we can call it by name.
We also can give it a different name if anyone wishes to suggest
one... that was definitely uninspired on my part.
Or will we just rename it to
Joshua Penix wrote:
The Debian install is as bare as can be - done with debootstrap, and
I've only added enhanced vim, sudo and SSH since. I suppose we
simply need to install and configure Apache/Zope/Plone, Postfix and
Mailman and then migrate data.
I have created a file on
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
Time to kick somebody off the KPLUG newbie list.
Done before you even sent the message. He was also subscribed to
-announce, but that has been removed too.
I also sent a message to the person's site, so he knows that his
auto-responder is broken.
Hopefully, we were the
Richard W. Ernst wrote:
Would someone change the email forwarding of the treasurer,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], to George?
I tried, but it looked like someone beat me to it.
I ran newaliases, and hopefully whatever prompted your request will be
resolved.
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
Stewart Stremler wrote:
begin quoting John H. Robinson, IV as of Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:31:28PM
-0700:
Neil Schneider wrote:
I thought maybe we could use irc channel for coordinating. We might
have to do it in a separate channel where there's less traffic.
chat.freenode.net
Neil Schneider wrote:
What will be required to get that started? I think we probably want a
Debian 4.0 (etch) basic install and then those of us who want can
begin setting up the software and testing. Coordinating may be a
challenge.
Thoughts on coordinating:
admins that need to work:
Neil Schneider wrote:
I thought maybe we could use irc channel for coordinating. We might
have to do it in a separate channel where there's less traffic.
chat.freenode.net
##sparkplug
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
As of a few minutes ago, the KPLUG web site was not responding to a
web browser. It responds to pings, and apparently the list server is
working, since fresh items keep appearing.
Restated. Thank you for noticing this.
Does anybody have any sort of monitoring set up
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
As of a few minutes ago, the KPLUG web site was not responding to a
web browser. It responds to pings, and apparently the list server is
working, since fresh items keep appearing.
Restated. Thank you for noticing this.
I meant to say
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
As of a few minutes ago, the KPLUG web site was not responding to a
web browser. It responds to pings, and apparently the list server is
working, since fresh items keep appearing.
Restated. Thank you
Neil Schneider wrote:
I checked the old email for room reservations and we have Room 306
reserved for May 3.
I think it would be a great idea to announce and have a meeting to
allow KPLUG members to actually see what our raffle money is being
used for.
I concur: May 3 is a *great* time
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Hmmm, maybe it's already implemented? I think I'll add to the subject
line of this email -- as a test message.
http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-steer/2007-April/003223.html
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN
HTML
HEAD
TITLE Helge has a
Joshua Penix wrote:
The original order specs were for a pair of 2.0GHz dual core Xeon
5130's, and the cost for those is about $350/ea. Now we have the
option of choosing the 2.0GHz quad core Xeon E5335 for about $730.
This would leave one socket free for further expansion, and would
Neil Schneider wrote:
I suggest we come to a consensus first. Do we use the $1920 version or
the $2500 version?
The 2500$ version.
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Let's have a KPLUG (self-signed) CA
KPLUG can/will sign member certs
CAcert already does this, I am a CAcert assurer, and CAcert root
certificates already exist in open source browsers.
OK
James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
Let's have a KPLUG (self-signed) CA
KPLUG can/will sign member certs
CAcert already does this, I am a CAcert assurer, and CAcert root
certificates already exist in open source browsers.
I contend that this is a solved problem. I do not see the value-added
with
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
I think this is not a spammer, merely a luser who has managed to get
on a mailing list, possibly forwarded from someone who is really on
the list. Or maybe forwarded by a bot.
Without playing the challenge/response game, I don't know how to trace
how he got the
Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
I just sent a password rant and deleted all references to the university.
It's probably stuck in the queue as the address isn't subscribed, so if
somebody could just delete it, i'll repost from normal.
I did not see any messages in the moderatiion queue. I seem to
Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
However, I thought we were supposed to get a return message saying
something like you are unsubscribed.
Or was that getting abused to launch DoS attacks.
It's mailman, I have no idea what mailman does. I find it finicky and
opaque, personally. But, it is what we
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
However, I thought we were supposed to get a return message saying
something like you are unsubscribed.
Or you can go ahead and get your rejection notice :)
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin
Steerage,
Do we have a topic for January? If so, is it on the website? (I never
look at the website . . .)
I would like to have a key-signing, and CAcert signing (I am a CAcert
Assurer, so I can validate other people).
This could tie in with an openssl/gnupg presentation, or it could be a
Wow, what a horrible subject line. Sorry about that. At least I
remembered to take out the In-Reply-To: header.
-john
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Steerage,
Do we have a topic for January? If so, is it on the website? (I never
look at the website . . .)
I would like to have a key-signing
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
SCALE is again around the corner.
I have not spoken with the promoters nor organisers of the event, but we
have been offered a booth in previous years. I have no reason to suspect
that if we asked, we would be denied a booth.
The question is, do we want a booth? We
Gus Wirth wrote:
There was some discussion at the December meeting about replacing the
existing KPLUG server. I can't remember who got the last one, I think
Joshua? Anyway, we have the funds to get a new one so I say Neil
delegates this to whoever wants to volunteer and we go ahead and do
Neil Schneider wrote:
Joshua Penix wrote:
I'll put a quote together as soon as I can and post it to the list.
We should slide in south of $2k.
I like that price better.
Me too. But someone had to get the number ball rolling.
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
Admins and Steerage,
I was looking into the mailman issue on sparky today. Our version could
use some upgrading. We are currently holding our mailman package against
upgrade.
I have taken a copy of the currently installed mailman and placed it into
~root. I want to upgrade our mailman to the
Joshua Penix wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:08 AM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
I have taken a copy of the currently installed mailman and placed
it into
~root. I want to upgrade our mailman to the most recently released
version that Debian provides, test it, then go yell at people
date
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
Joshua Penix wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 11:08 AM, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
If mailman breaks, in theory I could re-install the version that is
currently installed and everything will Just Work. This is the same
theory that states that everything will Just Work right after the
upgrade, so
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Let's see if it did work!
Welcome to the brave new world of the new mailman.
There was some messages lost, that were all in the shunt directory. The
all looked to be spam.
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Neil Schneider wrote:
Is this a version that has been patched for the vulnerability?
No... but mailman is no longer on hold, either. So as soon as it DOES
come out, we will get it.
Unless some enterprising soul (read: not me) wants to download,
configure, compile, install, and customise
Neil Schneider wrote:
This came from the SAN security list. Mailman needs to be upgraded to
2.1.9 as soon as the Debian package maintainer makes it available. It
isn't yet available in the apt repository.
There is an update to mailman currently available, however mailman is
currently a held
We are seeing more spam on the wiki. Any thoughts on how to prevent it?
-john
- Forwarded message from Helge Fahrnberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
one of my sites are being spammed with the following links:
Original Message
Subject:My Site
Date: 1 Sep 2006
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
We are seeing more spam on the wiki. Any thoughts on how to prevent it?
The only idea I can think of is to have new registerees go through a
manual approval process prior to havng editing/posting privledges.
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel
Jim,
Yes, I can write up a note about rPath. I will also be happy to introduce
them.
I appologise for the thread breaking, but as you can see I am posting this
from my @gmail account. Because this system is running sendmail. Yes, there
is a debian chroot on it, but I have not fully migrated all
Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
Lan Barnes wrote:
... and former RedHater and co-author of rpm, among other things.
Former RedHater? So he's now a RedLover? Or at least a RedLiker?
I presume you mean RedHatter?
RedHatter and RedHare.
Both equally insane. Never have tea with them.
-john
--
Neil Schneider wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV said:
Neil Schneider wrote:
Although I haven't had time to create announcements on the web site
for these, I think that March will be the movie and we can schedule
RPath for April. I need someone to send me personal emails for both
What do you guys think? Do we have anybody for March to speak?
-john
- Forwarded message from Brian Matsubara [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
John,
It was great to meet you at SCALE this past Saturday. Per our
discussion, please let me know if we can get on the schedule to speak at
your next
Gus Wirth wrote:
At 11:27 11/29/2005 -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
Gus Wirth wrote:
Don't do it. The tagging of messages in the header as spam is a function of
Whoah...are we talking about tagging messages as spam or merely putting
a tag in the subject to identify the mailing list such as
Thoughts?
I am not averse to subject line tags for -newbie. The big issue is that
the mail server is forcing some messages into spam, and the filtering is
not sufficient to prevent this.
Since it is -newbie, I am far more likely to assist with the use of tags.
The other lists I would be more
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
On 9/19/05, John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Lowenstein wrote:
The KPLUG logo that appears at the top of http://www.kernel-panic.org .
Yeah, but there ought to be someplace on the kernel-panic web site
that holds that logo.
As far as resolution
Neil Schneider wrote:
Anybody know anything about this??
-- Original Message --
Subject: Your Account is Suspended For Security Reasons
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Mon, July 11, 2005 8:44 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lan Barnes wrote:
FYI
What are we supposed to know?
-john
--
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
Lan Barnes wrote:
I (with my kids) will make every effort to be at Gus's tomorrow evening.
I know we have a lot to do during this exceptional period. But I'm
really hoping when it settles down we can get this operation on a benign
autopilot course.
I will try to make sure your kids have some
Joshua Penix wrote:
Stewart Stremler wrote:
I would run so long as I didn't take a seat away from another SIG.
The one thing I wanted that didn't get done in the bylaw/SIG guidelines
change was to have the board itself reworked so that it has the four
officer positions, and all other
Lan Barnes wrote:
I hadn't heard about their unwillingness to sign the SIG agreement,
which would seem like a prerequisite for having their money returned
under the bylaws.
The board can vote to spend SDCS money they way they want. UCHUG not
having agreed to the SIG guidelines is not a
Lance wrote:
I have been corrected. It only takes 20 people to make a quorom in the
New SDCS.
You must have misheard me.
Current SDPCUG membership is 57.
57 + 36 + 10 = 103. We would need 21 people. I can usually guarantee
about 11 or 12.
Isn't there also a South Bay users group? It
Neil Schneider wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV said:
The SIG Guidelines are ambiguous as to when the separation is
official.
Also true.
There is in paragraph 3) stipulations that the SIG must turn over all
assets to the SDCS within 30 days. It does not say that that is when
the SIG
Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
On Apr 14, 2005, at 3:32 PM, Neil Schneider wrote:
In this vein I have set up RCS directories for most things I've
changed from CLI. I think it's probably a good idea, since we have
multiple people doing admin work and if you check in your changes, you
can also
Gregory Ruiz-Ade wrote:
I think what's making this painful for us is that there's no clear
definitions of who's responsible for what on sparkplug.
We have a semblance of a list, that is the sudoers file. Of course,
there is no separation of tasks (ie: OS maitenance, website maintance,
Joshua Penix wrote:
If you think a change should be made, email me and request it or post
your suggestion to this list. If it's an appropriate change that
won't COMPLETELY CHANGE BEHAVIOR OF THE LISTS, I'll put it into
effect.
Could we please fix the attachement issue? I am not sure what
Lan Barnes wrote:
My MUA ia mutt. My email is composed in vi. The forwarded email was one
I had written earlier. I can forward another text message, but not
recreate the original because ... I just don't have time.
What? You don;t save outgoing messages in a forced-carbon-copy
methodology?
Joshua Penix wrote:
If you think a
change should be made, email me and request it or post your suggestion
to this list.
--
KPLUG-Steer mailing list
KPLUG-Steer@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-steer
Please fix the footers such that there
56 matches
Mail list logo
