On May 5, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Lan Barnes wrote:
Agreed, but even if we find that they spent $XXX from SDCS on their
succession (and I kind of doubt that they did[0]), then I would be
happy
just to deduct $XXX from what is returned to them, no harm/no foul.
From the last SDCS board meeting, all
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade said:
On May 4, 2005, at 10:07 PM, Andrew Lentvorski wrote:
Lan,
I believe that there is still at least 1 SDCS board seat open. If
that is the case, please put my name up to be
appointed/approved/whatever for that slot.
Given all the other KPLUG folks who did this
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 02:38:42PM -0700, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote:
I'm afraid I'm more optimistic than you, Lan. :) Basically, if they
reimburse themselves for SDMUG's incorporation costs from SDCS's funds,
they'd put themselves at risk of legal troubles. Legal troubles
revolving
I want to do a quick post on the outcome of the SDMUG vote on leaving
SDCS tonight. They're out. It was overwhelming, emotional, illogical,
and never in doubt.
I made the case for their staying in SDCS as planned. John Alvarado
(South Bay UG) was there, and he made an appeal as well. Some of
On May 4, 2005, at 8:18 PM, Lan Barnes wrote:
I want to do a quick post on the outcome of the SDMUG vote on leaving
SDCS tonight. They're out. It was overwhelming, emotional, illogical,
and never in doubt.
I never really thought it would be.
What respect I had for Claude Mathis was ... severely
