Re: Zope/Plone got rolled back? -- was Re: BookReview object

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Penix
On Dec 20, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Tracy R Reed wrote: If so I can just stop the 2.7 and start the 2.8 and we will be back to normal. Yes, 2.8 is current. Put it back! :) We can probably now safely remove the old packages. -- Joshua Penixhttp://www.binarytribe.

Re: Zope/Plone got rolled back? -- was Re: BookReview object

2006-12-20 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Tracy R Reed wrote: > James G. Sack (jim) wrote: >> Did the database get rolled-back? Did the zope/plone updates go away? > > I think what happened is I was not aware that there were two fully > functional zope installations on the site with a kplug instance in them. > Zope 2.7 and Zope 2.8 are in

Re: Zope/Plone got rolled back? -- was Re: BookReview object

2006-12-20 Thread Tracy R Reed
James G. Sack (jim) wrote: Did the database get rolled-back? Did the zope/plone updates go away? I think what happened is I was not aware that there were two fully functional zope installations on the site with a kplug instance in them. Zope 2.7 and Zope 2.8 are installed. I probably stopped

Zope/Plone got rolled back? -- was Re: BookReview object

2006-12-20 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Neil Schneider wrote: > Tracy R Reed wrote: > >> I finally got a round tuit and created us a nifty little BookReview >> object for the website in the form of a zope Product. It has fields >> for >> title, author, publisher, ISBN, a 1-5 rating, name of the reviewer, >> and >> of course a place for