On 12/08/2009 09:57 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
vcpu-arch.cr0 = cr0;
- vmx_set_cr4(vcpu, vcpu-arch.cr4);
+ vmx_set_cr4(vcpu, kvm_read_cr4(vcpu));
}
Another place accessed cr4 directly, in ept_update_paging_mode_cr4()
That one is called from
Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote on 12/08/2009 07:48:00 AM:
Avishay; this would be the total sectors in an I/O, as separate from
SIZE_MAX
(maximum size of any single scatterlist entry) and SEG_MAX (maximum
number of
scatterlist entries)?
Correct. In the guest virtblk driver, it
On 12/08/2009 11:44 AM, Avishay Traeger1 wrote:
Thanks!
Rusty.
Sure. Avi - do you want me to resubmit the kvm and qemu patches?
You mean the virtio and qemu patches. That's up to their maintainers
(Rusty and Anthony).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to
This patch will add a server-side test namely kvm_migration. Currently,
it will use existing KVM client test framework and add a new file
kvm_migration.py to help judge executing routine: source machine or dest
machine.
Improvement based on Version #2:
* Log into migrated guest from source
Since kvm_test_utils.migrate() adds two arguments to adopt
server-side migration. This client side test also needs update.
Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow yz...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/tests/migration.py |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 12/07/2009 10:51 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The BAD_POOL_HEADER BSOD happens at address 0xF8A000DDD000 (complaining it contains
00, Arg4).
Walking the pagetables takes to 0x18996 as the pte page:
(qemu) xp 0x18996ee8 (vaddr 0xF8A000DDD000)
18996ee8: 0x153c9963
(qemu)
On 12/02/2009 04:44 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 03:36:41PM +0100, Chris Lalancette wrote:
Make sure that we kick the appropriate vcpu when delivering
an interrupt. This makes sure that we wake any idle cpus
to cause a vcpu_run and an interrupt injection to occur.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:23:18AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:39:19 pm Shirley Ma wrote:
Guest virtio_net receives packets from its pre-allocated vring
buffers, then it delivers these packets to upper layer protocols
as skb buffs. So it's not necessary to
On 12/07/2009 07:54 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
Hi Folks:
Today pretty much all install tests for kvm and qemu upstream git
failed. the vm screen says something along the lines:
Starting SeaBIOS [version-string]
No bootable device.
Screenshot attached. The command line the test used:
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 06:24:15PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
User space may not want to overwrite asynchronously changing VCPU event
states on write-back. So allow to skip nmi.pending and sipi_vector by
setting corresponding bits in the flags field of kvm_vcpu_events.
Signed-off-by: Jan
On 12/08/2009 04:02 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 06:24:15PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
User space may not want to overwrite asynchronously changing VCPU event
states on write-back. So allow to skip nmi.pending and sipi_vector by
setting corresponding bits in the flags
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/08/2009 09:57 AM, Sheng Yang wrote:
vcpu-arch.cr0 = cr0;
- vmx_set_cr4(vcpu, vcpu-arch.cr4);
+ vmx_set_cr4(vcpu, kvm_read_cr4(vcpu));
}
Another place accessed cr4 directly, in
On 12/08/2009 04:40 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
But you are right, I should have placed a comment. I'll add a patch
that inlines ept_update_paging_mode_cr4 into its caller so it can
access the cr4 parameter directly instead of vcpu-arch.cr4.
Just notice another thing, seems the
Am 07.12.2009 16:00, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 07.12.2009 15:16, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
Likely not. What I did was nothing special, and I did not noticed such a
crash in the last months.
And now it happened again (qemu-kvm head, during kernel installation
from network onto local qcow2-disk). Any
We now have S390x KVM support in qemu upstream.
Unfortunately it doesn't work in qemu-kvm, because that has its own main
loop and slightly different calling conventions for the KVM helpers.
So let's hack in some small compat ifdefs that make qemu-kvm work on S390x!
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/07/2009 07:54 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
Hi Folks:
Today pretty much all install tests for kvm and qemu upstream git
failed. the vm screen says something along the lines:
Starting SeaBIOS [version-string]
No bootable device.
Screenshot attached. The
Commit 6c8166a77c98f473eb91e96a61c3cf78ac617278 folded
this file away.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches j...@perches.com
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index ea781c1..fda3eec 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3109,7 +3109,6 @@ L:kvm@vger.kernel.org
W:
Currently the autotest subtest relies on symbolic
links placed in the kvm test. During the control
file cleanup discussions, we decided we don't want
to rely on symlinks too heavily, then make the
autotest subtest a bit more robust, avoiding such
dependencies.
Note: If the control file cleanup is
For some reason, when the stress test was addeed to
the KVM tests, the control file for it came without
the actual statement to execute the stress test. Let's
fix that.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/autotest_control/stress.control |1 +
1 files
In order to reflect the new schema of config files.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/kvm_config.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/kvm_config.py b/client/tests/kvm/kvm_config.py
index
Since the KVM config system deliver strings for the user,
let's make a bit of eval trickery to make the old syntax
for the koji method work.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues l...@redhat.com
---
client/tests/kvm/tests/build.py | 17 ++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7
Patch: Major control file cleanup
URL: http://patchwork.test.kernel.org/patch/1600/
Comments: Stage 1 of the planned work done
Status: Need review (patchset made by the maintainer, need review by
other people)
Patch: KSM ovecommit test v.2
URL: http://patchwork.test.kernel.org/patch/1529/
Am 09.12.2009 um 05:37 schrieb Zhang, Xiantao
xiantao.zh...@intel.com:
I don't think how much effort needs to make it work again. So maybe
need to evaluate it first, and give you the answer later. By the
way, are you using it now ?
No, but sles11 ships with it and I want to make
On 12/08/2009 11:34 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
(-boot n actually overwrites -boot d.)
Isn't PXE booting temporarily disabled in qemu-kvm? So there is no
device remaining and the tests fail.
Avi, can you confirm that? If that's the case, I will have to switch
over step file
24 matches
Mail list logo
