Bugs item #2235570, was opened at 2008-11-07 18:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2235570group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:13:41PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/28/2010 04:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But rather need to use ugly factory functions with all sorts of
DO_UPCAST. This is really unfriendly especially for writing test
cases.
Yes, I agree. Just moving memory
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:48:40PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com
Applied, thanks.
---
drivers/vhost/net.c |2 +-
drivers/vhost/vhost.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:48:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
When counting pages we should increase it by 1 instead of VHOST_PAGE_SIZE,
and also make log_write() can correctly process the request across
pages with write_address not start at page boundary.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:18:40AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:48:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
When counting pages we should increase it by 1 instead of VHOST_PAGE_SIZE,
and also make log_write() can correctly process the request across
pages with
Am 27.11.2010 08:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Christian Brunner
c.m.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the review. What am I supposed to do now?
Kevin is the block maintainer. His review is the next step, I have
CCed him. After that rbd would be ready to
On 11/28/2010 06:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
sparce lets you solve C problems that C++ inherited as is.
E.g. if you have a pointer you can always dereference it.
It's the other way round.
For example __user cannot be done in C. It has to be done as an add-on.
In C++ it's
On 11/28/2010 04:40 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 11:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On 11/28/2010 04:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/28/2010 01:49 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
+++ b/api/kvmxx.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+#include kvmxx.h
+#includefcntl.h
+#includesys/ioctl.h
Am 28.11.2010 12:55, schrieb Yoshiaki Tamura:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace bdrv_aio_writev() with bdrv_aio_writev_proxy() to let
event-tap capture events from dma-helpers.
Signed-off-by: Yoshiaki
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:00 AM, T Johnson tjohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Nikola Ciprich extmaill...@linuxbox.cz
wrote:
Hello Thomas,
I t hink blkio-cgroup really can't help You here, but since NFS is
network protocol,
why not just consider some kind
Am 29.11.2010 09:59, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 27.11.2010 08:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Christian Brunner
c.m.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the review. What am I supposed to do now?
Kevin is the block maintainer. His review is the next step, I have
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/27 Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at
Hi,
BTW are you actually aware of any option rom with multiple BCVs and, if
yes, how those BCVs differ?
Multiple BCVs - yes. A SCSI card will define a BCV for each attached
drive. I don't have a scsi card myself, but the support was added by
a user who ran into the problem first hand.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:22:44AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
No need for an additional toolchain.
It's a feature :) This way you are not forced to rewrite all code each
time you realize you need an extra check, and checks can be added
gradually without breaking build.
You can see that
Hi,
If scsi card has optionrom with only one bcv then Seabios can determine
its boot order from device path, so why not provide user with this
option today?
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Try to keep track of which bcv/bev belongs to which pci device? It
should
On 11/29/2010 12:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:22:44AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
No need for an additional toolchain.
It's a feature :) This way you are not forced to rewrite all code each
time you realize you need an extra check, and checks can be added
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
event-tap controls when to start FT transaction, and provides proxy
functions to called from net/block devices. While FT transaction, it
queues up net/block requests, and flush them when the transaction gets
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:52:29PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
The default is duplication. With C++ your default is
tr1::unordered_map and you can optimize it later if you like.
BTW not relevant to kvm, but for qemu, some people seem to care about
building with an old migw compiler in Debian
On Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:22:56 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
I'm fine giving (personal) user accounts away for people who just ask for
it. Or do you want to make this only available for a small (trusted)
group?
I think you can give accounts to kvm contributors (present in kvm.git
commit
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:19:29AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
BTW are you actually aware of any option rom with multiple BCVs and, if
yes, how those BCVs differ?
Multiple BCVs - yes. A SCSI card will define a BCV for each attached
drive. I don't have a scsi card myself, but the
Am 29.11.2010 12:36, Daniel Gollub wrote:
On Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:22:56 pm Avi Kivity wrote:
I'm fine giving (personal) user accounts away for people who just ask for
it. Or do you want to make this only available for a small (trusted)
group?
I think you can give accounts to kvm
2010/11/29 Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com:
Am 28.11.2010 12:55, schrieb Yoshiaki Tamura:
2010/11/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
Replace bdrv_aio_writev() with bdrv_aio_writev_proxy() to let
event-tap capture events from
Could you formulate the constraints so developers are aware of them in
the future and can protect the codebase. How about expanding the
Kemari wiki pages?
If you like the idea above, I'm happy to make the list also on
the wiki page.
Here's a different question: what requirements
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
Could you formulate the constraints so developers are aware of them in
the future and can protect the codebase. How about expanding the
Kemari wiki pages?
If you like the idea above, I'm happy to make the list also on
the wiki page.
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
Could you formulate the constraints so developers are aware of them
in the future and can protect the codebase. How about expanding the
Kemari wiki pages?
If you like the idea above, I'm happy to make the list also on
the wiki page.
On 11/29/2010 05:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:52:29PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
The default is duplication. With C++ your default is
tr1::unordered_map and you can optimize it later if you like.
BTW not relevant to kvm, but for qemu, some people seem
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
Could you formulate the constraints so developers are aware of them
in the future and can protect the codebase. How about expanding the
Kemari wiki pages?
If you like the idea above, I'm
On 11/29/2010 02:04 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:13:41PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/28/2010 04:28 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
But rather need to use ugly factory functions with all sorts of
DO_UPCAST. This is really unfriendly
On 11/29/2010 03:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
But really, let's defer this discussion for when patches are
available. I understand your objections but I'm pretty convinced that
the code will speak for itself when it's ready.
It will, but everyone will hear something different.
--
error
Michael S. Tsirkin writes:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:48:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
When counting pages we should increase it by 1 instead of VHOST_PAGE_SIZE,
and also make log_write() can correctly process the request across
pages with write_address not start at page boundary.
Currently fault injection is somewhat confused with important information
carried in the vcpu area where it has no place. This patch cleans it up.
Gleb, Joerg, I'd appreciate review and testing of the apf and nnpt related
changes.
Goes on top of the previous 7-part emulator series. Also
To answer Stefan's question, there shouldn't be any requirement
for a device, but must be tested with Kemari. If it doesn't work
correctly, the problems must be fixed before adding to the list.
What exactly are the problems? Is this a device bus of a Kemari bug?
If it's the former
Currently page fault cr2 and nesting infomation are carried outside
the fault data structure. Instead they are placed in the vcpu struct,
which results in confusion as global variables are manipulated instead
of passing parameters.
Fix this issue by adding address and nested fields to struct
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
To answer Stefan's question, there shouldn't be any requirement
for a device, but must be tested with Kemari. If it doesn't work
correctly, the problems must be fixed before adding to the list.
What exactly are the problems? Is this a device
If devices incorrectly claim support for live migration, then that should
also be fixed, either by removing the broken code or by making it work.
I totally agree with you.
AFAICT your current proposal is just feeding back the results of some
fairly specific QA testing. I'd rather not
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
If devices incorrectly claim support for live migration, then that should
also be fixed, either by removing the broken code or by making it work.
I totally agree with you.
AFAICT your current proposal is just feeding back the results of some
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 04:54:42PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
kvm_setup_cpuid seems unused, so remove it.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to
This patch introduces a generic representation of guest-mode
fpr a vcpu. This currently only exists in the SVM code.
Having this representation generic will help making the
non-svm code aware of nesting when this is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com
---
This patch prevents that emulation failures which result
from emulating an instruction for an L2-Guest results in
being reported to userspace.
Without this patch a malicious L2-Guest would be able to
kill the L1 by triggering a race-condition between an vmexit
and the instruction emulator.
With
This patch replaces the is_nested logic in the SVM module
with the generic notion of guest-mode.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 44 +---
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
this patch-set introduces a generic notion of guest-mode for VCPUs in
KVM. This is already useful as seen in patch 3/3. Nested-VMX also has a
guest-mode, so it will make sense for this code too.
Regards,
Joerg
As usual:
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |1 +
Sorry, I didn't get what you're trying to tell me. My plan would
be to initially start from a subset of devices, and gradually
grow the number of devices that Kemari works with. While this
process, it'll include what you said above, file a but and/or fix
the code. Am I missing what
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:12:29AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
Gleb, Joerg, I'd appreciate review and testing of the apf and nnpt related
changes.
I'll give it a test as soon as possible.
Joerg
--
AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:52:09PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
This patchset adds an API test framework. Rather than driving kvm from qemu,
we now have a way of calling the kvm API directly and observing the results.
We can switch to guest mode and back at will and see any micro effects such
as
On 11/29/2010 05:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
This patch introduces a generic representation of guest-mode
fpr a vcpu. This currently only exists in the SVM code.
Having this representation generic will help making the
non-svm code aware of nesting when this is necessary.
+static inline void
On 11/29/2010 05:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
this patch-set introduces a generic notion of guest-mode for VCPUs in
KVM. This is already useful as seen in patch 3/3. Nested-VMX also has a
guest-mode, so it will make sense for this code too.
Looks good, apart from the
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_x86_64_debian_5_0 on
qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_x86_64_debian_5_0/builds/653
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_i386_debian_5_0 on
qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_i386_debian_5_0/builds/654
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_x86_64_out_of_tree on
qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_x86_64_out_of_tree/builds/602
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of disable_kvm_i386_out_of_tree on
qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/disable_kvm_i386_out_of_tree/builds/602
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of default_x86_64_debian_5_0 on
qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/default_x86_64_debian_5_0/builds/663
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_kvm_1
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of default_x86_64_out_of_tree on
qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/default_x86_64_out_of_tree/builds/604
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of default_i386_debian_5_0 on qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/default_i386_debian_5_0/builds/665
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_kvm_2
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of default_i386_out_of_tree on qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/default_i386_out_of_tree/builds/602
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_kvm_2
Bugs item #2905358, was opened at 2009-11-28 16:37
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2905358group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Instead of spamming the output with complaints about missing fields, simply
return an error to the caller, which can print something out or do something
more intelligent about them.
Fixes kvm plugin tracing older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
parse-events.c | 15
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/29 Paul Brook p...@codesourcery.com:
If devices incorrectly claim support for live migration, then that should
also be fixed, either by removing the broken code or by making it work.
I totally
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:10:59AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/29/2010 05:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
this patch-set introduces a generic notion of guest-mode for VCPUs in
KVM. This is already useful as seen in patch 3/3. Nested-VMX also has a
guest-mode, so it
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:12:30AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
Currently page fault cr2 and nesting infomation are carried outside
the fault data structure. Instead they are placed in the vcpu struct,
which results in confusion as global variables are manipulated instead
of passing parameters.
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 18:20 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Instead of spamming the output with complaints about missing fields, simply
return an error to the caller, which can print something out or do something
more intelligent about them.
Fixes kvm plugin tracing older kernels.
Hmm, what about
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:49:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20101119:
kvm.c:(.init.text+0x11f49): undefined reference to `kvm_register_clock'
when CONFIG_KVM_CLOCK is not enabled.
BUild error still
On 11/29/2010 06:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:49:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20101119:
kvm.c:(.init.text+0x11f49): undefined reference to `kvm_register_clock'
when
On 11/29/2010 06:23 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/29 Paul Brookp...@codesourcery.com:
If devices incorrectly claim support for live migration, then that should
also be fixed, either by removing the
This patch introduces a generic representation of guest-mode
fpr a vcpu. This currently only exists in the SVM code.
Having this representation generic will help making the
non-svm code aware of nesting when this is necessary.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com
---
This patch prevents that emulation failures which result
from emulating an instruction for an L2-Guest results in
being reported to userspace.
Without this patch a malicious L2-Guest would be able to
kill the L1 by triggering a race-condition between an vmexit
and the instruction emulator.
With
Hi Avi, Hi Marcelo,
here is the re-spin I promised. The change to V1 are essentially the
renames:
kvm_vcpu_enter_gm - enter_guest_mode
kvm_vcpu_leave_gm - leave_guest_mode
kvm_vcpu_is_gm- is_guest_mode
No other changes are in this patch-set compared to V1.
Regards,
This patch replaces the is_nested logic in the SVM module
with the generic notion of guest-mode.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel joerg.roe...@amd.com
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 44 +---
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration
working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I checked Kemari needs additional
hooks and it will be too hard to keep that out of tree until
This implements a virtio simulator:
- adds stubs for enough support functions to compile
virtio ring in userspace.
- Adds a stub vhost based module this can talk to.
This should help us decide things like which ring layout
works best.
Communication is currently done using an eventfd
On 11/29/2010 10:53 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration
working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I checked Kemari needs additional
hooks and it will
This adds a test module for vhost infrastructure.
Intentionally not tied to kbuild to prevent people
from installing and loading it accidentally.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
---
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/test.c b/drivers/vhost/test.c
new file mode 100644
index
This is the userspace part of the tool: it includes a bunch of stubs for
linux APIs, somewhat simular to linuxsched. This makes it possible to
recompile the ring code in userspace.
A small test example is implemented combining this with vhost_test
module.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
On 11/29/2010 10:53 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration
working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I checked Kemari needs additional
hooks and it
On 11/29/2010 06:26 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 18:20 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Instead of spamming the output with complaints about missing fields, simply
return an error to the caller, which can print something out or do something
more intelligent about them.
Fixes
(Sorry for late reply...)
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:23:13 +0100, Roedel, Joerg said:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:17:53AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/25/2010 03:13 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
What about things like adding instructions and forgetting to add the
corresponding svm.c code?
Cannot
The kvm plugin understands a few new fields; don't warn if they are missing,
as expected on older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
plugin_kvm.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/plugin_kvm.c b/plugin_kvm.c
index c1cb2e4..8115235
On 11/29/2010 11:18 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
On 11/29/2010 10:53 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration
working w/o Kemari. In addition, last
On 11/29/2010 06:35 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:49:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20101119:
kvm.c:(.init.text+0x11f49): undefined reference
On 11/29/10 09:47, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:35 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:49:11 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20101119:
On 11/29/2010 07:52 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 11/29/10 09:47, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:35 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:49:11 +1100
At the 2010 Linux Plumber's Conference Virtualization Mini-Conference earlier
this month, I did a presentation about physical memory utilization and
Transcendent Memory (tmem). I mentioned that I am developing an in-kernel
version of tmem that might be suitable, with small modifications, for use
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:23:38PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
(Sorry for late reply...)
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:23:13 +0100, Roedel, Joerg said:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:17:53AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/25/2010 03:13 PM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
What about things like
On 11/29/10 10:08, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/29/2010 07:52 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 11/29/10 09:47, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:35 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/29/2010 06:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:26:27 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:20:17 am Jan Kiszka wrote:
Unfortunately we're running (in meanwhile) an old version of buildbot as
buildbot-master (0.7.8, as shipped by Debian 5).
Last time I checked (quite a few moons ago, though), that version
contained an unfixed security issue. I
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 11:02 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 29.11.2010 09:59, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 27.11.2010 08:12, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Christian Brunner
c.m.brun...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the review. What am I supposed to do now?
Kevin is the
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 19:32:12 +0100, Joerg Roedel said:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:23:38PM -0500, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
(Sorry for late reply...)
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:23:13 +0100, Roedel, Joerg said:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:17:53AM -0500, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/25/2010
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 19:25 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
The kvm plugin understands a few new fields; don't warn if they are missing,
as expected on older kernels.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
plugin_kvm.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:00 AM, T Johnson tjohnso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Nikola Ciprich extmaill...@linuxbox.cz
wrote:
Hello Thomas,
I t hink blkio-cgroup really can't help You
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:06:48PM +0900, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
event-tap controls when to start FT transaction, and provides proxy
functions to called from net/block devices. While FT transaction, it
queues up net/block requests, and flush them when the transaction gets
completed.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 08:47:34PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:15:44PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Suppose we have /p...@i0cf8/s...@3/d...@0,0 with boot index 5 in
boot devices list and suppose pci device in
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:50:45AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
If scsi card has optionrom with only one bcv then Seabios can determine
its boot order from device path, so why not provide user with this
option today?
It's unclear to me how SeaBIOS is supposed to do that.
Try to keep track of
Please send any agenda items you are interested in covering.
As I forgot to put the call for agenda befor, Anthony already suggested:
- 2011 kvm conference
- 0.14.0 release plan
- infrastructure changes (irc channel migration, git tree migration)
thanks, Juan.
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Bugs item #2493108, was opened at 2009-01-08 12:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kmshanah
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2493108group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Bugs item #2494730, was opened at 2009-01-09 09:59
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kmshanah
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2494730group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
2010/11/30 Dor Laor dl...@redhat.com:
On 11/29/2010 06:23 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura
tamura.yoshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp wrote:
2010/11/29 Paul Brookp...@codesourcery.com:
If devices incorrectly claim support for live migration, then that
should
2010/11/30 Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws:
On 11/29/2010 10:53 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
Is this a fair summary: any device that supports live migration workw
under Kemari?
It might be fair summary but practically we barely have live migration
working w/o Kemari. In addition, last I
Bugs item #2493108, was opened at 2009-01-08 03:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2493108group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
98 matches
Mail list logo
