Hi Stephen,
Please remove my quilt tree
http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/ from linux-next, and use my
git trees from now on:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux.git
Branches:
modules-next
virtio-next
For others: beware that these will
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hello Jan,
Am 01.10.2012 16:34, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
If we built a target for a host that supports KVM in principle, set the
default accelerator to KVM as well. This also means
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com writes:
I think at this point, none of this matters but I added the various
distro maintainers to the thread.
I think it's time for the distros to drop qemu-kvm and just ship
qemu.git. Is
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
James,
patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU
passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but in Linux
it must become 32768 (because LUNs
Hello,
would a Memory Dump from inside the VM help solving the BSOD,
or is that pointless?
Thank you for your patience and help ;)
Am 28.09.2012 18:29, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
On 2012-09-28 17:50, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 10:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-09-27 21:18,
Orit Wasserman wrote:
On 09/16/2012 01:39 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block migration plus xbzrle. The migration fails if both are used
together. XBZRLE without block migration works.
Il 02/10/2012 10:18, James Bottomley ha scritto:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:11 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 26/07/2012 15:28, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
James,
patch 1 fixes scanning of LUNs whose number is greater than 255. QEMU
passes a max_lun of 16383 (because it uses SAM numbering) but
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
Add the init code for the hypervisor, the virtual machine, and
the virtual CPUs.
An interrupt handler is also wired to allow the VGIC maintenance
interrupts, used to deal with level
On 10/02/2012 10:33 AM, lieven-li...@dlh.net wrote:
Orit Wasserman wrote:
On 09/16/2012 01:39 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block migration plus xbzrle. The migration fails if both are
Am 02.10.2012 um 11:28 schrieb Orit Wasserman:
On 10/02/2012 10:33 AM, lieven-li...@dlh.net wrote:
Orit Wasserman wrote:
On 09/16/2012 01:39 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block
Il 16/09/2012 12:39, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block migration plus xbzrle. The migration fails if both are used
together. XBZRLE without block migration works.
Can someone please
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:46:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hello Jan,
Am 01.10.2012 16:34, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
If we built a target for a host that supports KVM in
Am 02.10.2012 um 11:38 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 16/09/2012 12:39, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block migration plus xbzrle. The migration fails if both are used
together. XBZRLE without
Il 02/10/2012 11:44, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
Am 02.10.2012 um 11:38 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 16/09/2012 12:39, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm 1.2.0 I am still not able to use
block migration plus xbzrle. The migration
On 10/01/2012 12:59 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 30.09.2012, at 13:29, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:59 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Do you have the auto-autotest setup ready? I guess we can do it
manually until it is.
I do have a local autotest setup. Or what exactly are you
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:24:13 +0100, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
Add the init code for the hypervisor, the virtual machine, and
the virtual CPUs.
An interrupt handler is also
On 10/02/2012 11:30 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 02.10.2012 um 11:28 schrieb Orit Wasserman:
On 10/02/2012 10:33 AM, lieven-li...@dlh.net wrote:
Orit Wasserman wrote:
On 09/16/2012 01:39 PM, Peter Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I remember that this was broken some time ago and currently with
qemu-kvm
On 05.08.2012, at 11:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall ju...@diku.dk
Convert a 0 error return code to a negative one, as returned elsewhere in the
function.
A new label is also added to avoid freeing things that are known to not yet
be allocated.
A simplified version of the
2012-10-02
--
- TODO to finish off qemu-kvm.git/master... (anthony)
posibilibites: Problems of compatability (options, migration, ...)
* configuration file to specify what versions are done
* scripts that converts the format
* documentation
* look at argv[0] and start
Hi list,
I have a CentOS 5.7 / kvm-88-3.el5.x86_64 and it gets at 99.9% mem
used. I'm not able to explain all memory usage nor identify what is
consuming all the memory. I've lost 100GB of memory that it's not
being identified on procs RSS, slab structures.
I really appreciate If somebody can
Avi, Marcelo,
here are some fixes for kvm on s390.
Would be good if we could add s390/kvm: dont announce RRBM support for
3.7 since the current kvm claims a feature that we currently dont support.
Everything else can be queued for the next merge window. Thanks
Christian Borntraeger (1):
Newer kernels (linux-next with the transparent huge page patches)
use rrbm if the feature is announced via feature bit 66.
RRBM will cause intercepts, so KVM does not handle it right now,
causing an illegal instruction in the guest.
The easy solution is to disable the feature bit for the guest.
From: Jason J. Herne jjhe...@us.ibm.com
EXTERNAL_CALL and EMERGENCY type interrupts need to preserve their interrupt
code parameter when being injected from user space.
Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne jjhe...@us.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Martin
From: Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky schwidef...@de.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger borntrae...@de.ibm.com
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 33 +
1
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Lentes, Bernd
bernd.len...@helmholtz-muenchen.de wrote:
I also have to create some new vm's. What is when disk space is running out ?
My idea is to create the new vm's in raw images. Inside the vm, filesystems
will reside in logical volumes. When disk space is
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 27/09/2012 02:10, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
+do {
+virtqueue_disable_cb(vq);
+while ((vbr = virtqueue_get_buf(vblk-vq, len)) !=
NULL) {
+if
Hi Rusty,
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:56:56 +0930 Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au wrote:
Please remove my quilt tree
http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/kernel/rr-latest/ from linux-next, and use my
git trees from now on:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rusty/linux.git
Branches:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Felix Leimbach
felix.leimb...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to implement live-migration of a highly available VM but I cannot use
shared storage.
The -b option to the migrate command already allows for copying the block
device (locally stored raw file) and that is
On Oct 2, 2012, at 6:25 AM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:24:13 +0100, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
From: Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com
Add the init code for the hypervisor,
On 2 October 2012 18:55, Christoffer Dall c.d...@virtualopensystems.com wrote:
On Oct 2, 2012, at 6:25 AM, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 10:24:13 +0100, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com
We really don't want the physical memory map for the guest hardwired in
the
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:31:43PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
We probably want to be passing in the base of the cpu-internal
peripherals, rather than base of the GIC specifically. For the
A15 these are the same thing, but that's not inherent [compare the
A9 which has more devices at fixed
On 2 October 2012 20:28, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 07:31:43PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
We probably want to be passing in the base of the cpu-internal
peripherals, rather than base of the GIC specifically. For the
A15 these are the same thing, but that's
On 10/01/2012 12:59 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 30.09.2012, at 13:29, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/27/2012 09:59 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Do you have the auto-autotest setup ready? I guess we can do it
manually until it is.
I do have a local autotest setup. Or what exactly are you
On 05.08.2012, at 11:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall ju...@diku.dk
Convert a 0 error return code to a negative one, as returned elsewhere in the
function.
A new label is also added to avoid freeing things that are known to not yet
be allocated.
A simplified version of the
34 matches
Mail list logo
