On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:54:32AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/07/2013 18:33, Cornelia Huck ha scritto:
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:30:40 +0200
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 03/07/2013 16:30, Cornelia Huck ha scritto:
+ /*
+ * Return cookie in gpr 2, but don't
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:25:16PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:54:32AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/07/2013 18:33, Cornelia Huck ha scritto:
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 17:30:40 +0200
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 03/07/2013 16:30, Cornelia Huck
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60271
--- Comment #11 from Michael S. Tsirkin m.s.tsir...@gmail.com ---
could you test latest upstream please?
A fix from there is in the process of being backported to stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:13:42PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
kvm : Paravirtual ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM
hypervisor
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri va...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
During smp_boot_cpus paravirtualied KVM guest detects if the hypervisor has
required
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:13:53PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
From: Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Note that we are using APIC_DM_REMRD which has reserved usage.
In future if APIC_DM_REMRD usage is standardized,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:13:04PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri va...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
kvm_hc_kick_cpu allows the calling vcpu to kick another vcpu out of halt
state.
the presence of
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:14:15PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
kvm hypervisor: Add directed yield in vcpu block path
From: Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
We use the improved PLE handler logic in vcpu block patch for
scheduling rather than plain schedule, so that we can
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 14:38 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
The Call for Proposals for the 2013 Linux Plumbers Virtualization
Microconference is now open. This uconf is being held as part of Linux
Plumbers Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA September 18-20th and
is co-located with
On 07/13/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:50 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
[1] SOFT_DISABLE_INTS seems an odd name for something that updates the
software state to be consistent with interrupts being *hard* disabled.
I can sort of see the logic in it, but it's
On 07/13/2013 01:50 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/11/2013 10:22:28 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
If so, why not to remove directly hard_irq_disable() inside
kvmppc_handle_exit() by reverting that commit, kvm/ppc/booke64: Fix lazy ee
handling in kvmppc_handle_exit()?
Then we can use SOFT_DISABLE_INTS()
We can access paca directly after hard interrupt disabled, and
this can avoid accessing wrong paca when using get_paca() in
preempt case.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@windriver.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:20 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
What about SOFT_IRQ_DISABLE? This is close to name
hard_irq_disable() :) And
then remove all DISABLE_INTS as well?
Or RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE...
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message
On 07/15/2013 10:47 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:20 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
What about SOFT_IRQ_DISABLE? This is close to name
hard_irq_disable() :) And
then remove all DISABLE_INTS as well?
Or RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE...
But sounds this doesn't imply this key
On 07/14/2013 12:13 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:54 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
Is the following fine?
powerpc: to access local paca after hard irq disabled
We can access paca directly after hard interrupt disabled, and
this can avoid accessing wrong paca when
On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 21:45 +0200, Gustav Sorenson wrote:
Hello Alex,
I'm thinking about buying a HD 7850 to go with my integrated graphics
card, so that I can pass the 7850 to a KVM guest and keep the
integrated GPU for the host. However, I'd like to use the proprietary
AMD drivers for the
Hi Gleb and Paolo,
What is the status of this patch since the relevant patch for KVM is
accepted? These two patches must cooperate to fix the bug.
Arthur
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Arthur Chunqi Li yzt...@gmail.com wrote:
The recent KVM patch adds IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL support. QEMU needs
On 07/14/2013 07:18 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:13:04PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri va...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
kvm_hc_kick_cpu allows the calling vcpu to kick another
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:44:01PM +0800, Arthur Chunqi Li wrote:
Hi Gleb and Paolo,
What is the status of this patch since the relevant patch for KVM is
accepted? These two patches must cooperate to fix the bug.
Need some reviews from migration and machine type experts. Copying Juan
and
On 07/13/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:50 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
[1] SOFT_DISABLE_INTS seems an odd name for something that updates the
software state to be consistent with interrupts being *hard* disabled.
I can sort of see the logic in it, but it's
On 07/13/2013 01:50 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/11/2013 10:22:28 PM, tiejun.chen wrote:
If so, why not to remove directly hard_irq_disable() inside
kvmppc_handle_exit() by reverting that commit, kvm/ppc/booke64: Fix lazy ee
handling in kvmppc_handle_exit()?
Then we can use SOFT_DISABLE_INTS()
We can access paca directly after hard interrupt disabled, and
this can avoid accessing wrong paca when using get_paca() in
preempt case.
Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen tiejun.c...@windriver.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h |7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:20 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
What about SOFT_IRQ_DISABLE? This is close to name
hard_irq_disable() :) And
then remove all DISABLE_INTS as well?
Or RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE...
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm-ppc in
the body of a
On 07/14/2013 12:13 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 12:54 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
Is the following fine?
powerpc: to access local paca after hard irq disabled
We can access paca directly after hard interrupt disabled, and
this can avoid accessing wrong paca when
On 07/15/2013 10:47 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 10:20 +0800, tiejun.chen wrote:
What about SOFT_IRQ_DISABLE? This is close to name
hard_irq_disable() :) And
then remove all DISABLE_INTS as well?
Or RECONCILE_IRQ_STATE...
But sounds this doesn't imply this key
24 matches
Mail list logo
