and freeing
them twice.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong djw...@us.ibm.com
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index b7c78a4..7495ce3 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:56:34AM +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
I guess the solution for such issues is not to have kvm (or qemu) play
with nice levels, but instead send notifications on virtual frequency
changes on the qemu monitor. The management application can then choose
whether to ignore
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:56:51PM +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
How many VMs did you run in this test?
100 idle
All the VMs are idle except
the one where your benchmark runs?
Yes.
How about the actual effect when several VMs are doing some stuff?
If there are multiple VMs that are busy,
against vanilla 2.6.26.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 51 +---
include/asm-x86/kvm_host.h |1 +
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
complete discussion.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
bios/acpi-dsdt.dsl| 85 -
qemu/pc-bios/bios.bin | Bin
qemu/target-i386/helper.c |2 +
3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bios/acpi
