On 3/23/15, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
I have CCed the libvirt mailing list, since KVM is a component here but
your question seems to be mainly about libvirt, virt-manager,
virt-install, etc.
Apologies for posting to the wrong list, I assumed it would be KVM
related as the guest
Running
3.18.9-200.fc21.x86_64
qemu 2:2.1.3-3.fc21
libvirt 1.2.9.2-1.fc21
System is a Thinkpad X250 with Intel i7-5600u Broadwell GT2
I'm trying to replace the Win7 installation on my laptop with Fedora
21 and virtualizing Windows 7 for work purposes. I'd prefer to give
the guest its own NTFS
On 6/22/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for investigating and sharing the information you've found.
It's archived on the list so anyone who hits it in the future or wants
to reproduce it can try.
I decided to give it one more try before I formatted that machine and
tried
On 6/20/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, once you've tried qemu.git/master we'll know whether the bug
still exists and with all the info you've shared maybe Gerd (USB
maintainer) will know what the issue is.
Sadly, my noobness meant during the hours I had onsite, I could
On 6/18/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe the call is coming from hw/usb/host-linux.c:async_complete()
but am not using the same source tree as your qemu-kvm so I could be
off. The code suggests that QEMU also logs an error message
(USBDEVFS_REAPURBNDELAY: Inappropriate
On 6/18/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
off. The code suggests that QEMU also logs an error message
(USBDEVFS_REAPURBNDELAY: Inappropriate ioctl for device) when this
happens. If you want, check the libvirt log file for this guest - it
probably has tons of these messages in it.
On 6/13/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
Since system time is a large chunk you could use strace -f -p $(pgrep
qemu-kvm) or other system call tracing tools to see what the qemu-kvm
process is doing.
The command you gave didn't work so I replace $(pgrep) with PID of the
process
On 6/14/12, Veruca Salt verucasal...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.209.el6_2.4.x86_64
We had the same problem with 0.13
We were using it on Sandy Bridge motherboards when it happened. It was an
issue then, but we hanged to 1.0 a long time ago.
Why are you using 0.12 years after
On 6/12/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
Further tests done on the following set only
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.209.el6_2.4.x86_64
on SLES 6, 2.6.32-220.7.1.el.x86_64 (Intel 82801JI ICH10)
1. VMM add physical host usb device - select storage to guest
2. VMM remove hardware
3.
On 6/12/12, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
After some testing, the only steps needed are
1. VMM add physical host usb device - select storage to guest
2. VMM remove hardware
3. Physically remove the USB storage from the host, thread/core
assigned to guest goes 100%
Two
After removing a USB flash drive using virtual machine manager, I
notice that the core assigned to the VM guest goes up to 100% load.
Within the guest itself, there is no significant activity.
This also prompted me to look at the other physical machine from which
I used the USB flash drive to
On 9/27/11, Robin Lee Powell rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 04:15:37PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
It's unrelated to what you're actually using as the disks, whether
file or block devices like LVs. I think it just makes KVM tell the
host not to cache I/O done
On 9/26/11, Robin Lee Powell rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 01:49:18PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 9/25/11, Robin Lee Powell rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org wrote:
OK, so I've got a Linux host, and a bunch of Linux VMs.
This means that the host *and* all
On 9/25/11, Robin Lee Powell rlpow...@digitalkingdom.org wrote:
OK, so I've got a Linux host, and a bunch of Linux VMs.
This means that the host *and* all tho VMs do their own disk
caches/buffers and do their own swap as well.
If I'm not wrong, that's why the recommended and current default
On 9/19/11, day knight back2ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible and if yes then how.
Can we increase the memory on a live guest machine without having to
shutdown or reboot as well as increase and decrase CPUs. if it is
possible, can some one point me to the documentation :)
Chipping in my
I keep running into a situation where a KVM guest will lock up on some
kind of disk process it seems. System load goes way up but cpu % is
relatively low based on a crond script collecting data before
everything goes south. As a result, the host becoming unresponsive as
well. Initially it appeared
I'm planning to use iSCSI targets (over gigabit VLANs) for KVM guest
disks. The question I'm wondering about is whether it's better to md
(multi-path + mirror) the iSCSI targets on the host, then create LVM
partitions for the guests. Or to directly md the iSCSI targets within
the guest.
On one
On 6/14/11, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
My gut feeling is to do iscsi in the host. I guess it's best to measure
though. Please post your findings if you do that.
Any suggestions or recommendations as to how/what should I be measuring with?
So far in trying to determine how bad is the
On 4/29/11, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Only problem is... networking still isn't working although brctl show
on the host shows that a vnet0 had been created and attached to the
bridge. Any pointers would be appreciated!
Just to close off on this issue for the benefit
On 4/28/11, Simon Grinberg si...@redhat.com wrote:
What version of VMWare are you using?
Currently, I'm not using VMWare yet on this new server as I really do
hope to be able to use an unified solution. But so far, it's just
one brickwall after another. I've given myself until this weekend to
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
So why don't you use virt-manager?
The original intention was to run the host without any graphical
desktop or anything not necessary to host the guests. That was based
on reading and such which recommends not having anything beyond the
necessary
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
Qemu is not intended to be used directly by end user. It is too complex as
you already found out. VMware don't even give you access to such low parts
of virt stack. You should use libvirt or virt-manager instead. Especially
if you are concerned
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
of virt stack. You should use libvirt or virt-manager instead. Especially
if you are concerned about security. I think libvirt can start guest on
headless server.
If this still fails for you you need to complain to libvirt developers
(not in a
Unfortunately, things still don't work.
rant
It's just ridiculous that the installer under KVM does not detect the
cdrom drive it was booted from. Trying to do a net-install doesn't
work, maybe I messed up the networking even though br0 and eth0 is
working on the host.
Nevermind, let's install
This is probably a very noob question but I haven't been able to find
a solution that worked so far. Maybe it's just something really minor
that I've missed so I'll appreciate some pointers.
Running on Scientific Linux 6, bridged networking configured with
ifcfg-br0 and ifcfg-eth0, networking is
Resending because the first did not appear to go through
This is probably a very noob question but I haven't been able to find
a solution that worked so far. Maybe it's just something really minor
that I've missed so I'll appreciate some pointers.
Running on Scientific Linux 6, bridged
yet another day, I'll still give KVM
a try the next time I have to virtualize a machine.
On 11/9/10, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
09.11.2010 05:54, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation and just for the benefit of anybody else
who subsequently searches for keywords
I'm trying to convert a physical Windows XP machine into a KVM guest.
All the guides so far mentions using dd to create a flat image file,
then using qemu-img to convert that to qcow2. Since I've been making
mistake here and there, retrying the process several times (initially
converting each
Thanks for the confirmation and just for the benefit of anybody else
who subsequently searches for keywords KVM QEMU convert physical
drive virtual machine image /keywords, yes it works :)
On 11/9/10, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
09.11.2010 01:48, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I'm trying
I've been searching for howto on this but all the guides/docs I've
found seem to assume that we would want to either convert from an
existing VMWare/Xen VM or install a whole new VM.
So my question is: is it possible to create an image of a running
physical machine and then start it on another
On 7/11/10, ewheeler k...@ew.ewheeler.org wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 22:16 +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I'm trying to convert an existing VMWare Server 2 guest (Vista 64) to
KVM (on CentOS 5.5) in order to evaluate migrating to KVM.
Please advise if there is any more relevant
On 7/11/10, ewheeler k...@ew.ewheeler.org wrote:
I'm having trouble on CentOS 5.5 too
That doesn't sound too positive since Redhat is supposedly shifting to
KVM as their virtualization platform of choice. :(
--- Have you tried the testing repo using these instructions?
Which of these would be the recommended virtualization platform for
mainly CentOS guest on CentOS host especially for running a
virtualized mail server? From what I've read, objectively it seems
that VMWare's still the way to go although I would had like to go with
Xen or KVM just as a matter of
if by 'put storage on the network' you mean using a block-level
protocol (iSCSI, FCoE, AoE, NBD, DRBD...), then you should by all
means initiate on the host OS (Dom0 in Xen) and present to the VM as
if it were local storage. it's far faster and more stable that way.
in that case, storage
34 matches
Mail list logo
