On 02/01/12 11:27, Avi Kivity wrote:
+static bool vendor_intel(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
+{
+ u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
Just to be clean:
Shouldn't eax and ecx be initialized to zero?
regards Stephan
+
+ return ctxt-ops-get_cpuid(ctxt, eax, ebx, ecx, edx)
+ ebx
On 02/01/12 11:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/01/2012 12:45 PM, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
On 02/01/12 11:27, Avi Kivity wrote:
+static bool vendor_intel(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
+{
+ u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
Just to be clean:
Shouldn't eax and ecx be initialized to zero?
Either
Okay, thx to hear a second opinion.
Then everything is ok, have a nice day.
regards Stephan
On 01/16/12 10:58, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 08:44:50PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
Thank you for applying this, Marcelo.
I fear we (or me after I agreed) did some mistake
://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=0769c5de24621141c953fbe1f943582d37cb4244
http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=e28ba7bb020f07193bc000453c8775e9d2c0dda7
--
Dipl.-Inf. Stephan Bärwolf
Ilmenau University of Technology, Integrated Communication Systems Group
Phone
and not like Intel. (which would have to #UD ...)
While the crash is bad (esp. for admins using VMs to isolate),
because every unpriv. user can execute 0f05 - the misbehaviour
with GenuineIntel-cpuid is just a blemish.
Best regards,
Stephan Bärwolf
Stephan Baerwolf (2):
KVM: extend struct
From a8f796f81979094b81cb74535632786ce1ccf9bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:25:59 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: extend struct x86_emulate_ops with get_cpuid
In order to be able to proceed checks on CPU-specific properties
From d62ca9897e9970d777aec1d399318b0df44489bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:03:47 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: fix missing illegal instruction-trap in
protected modes
On hosts without this patch, 32bit guests will crash
On 01/11/12 20:09, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:26:49PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
From 2168285ffb30716f30e129c3ce98ce42d19c4d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:03:47 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM
On 01/11/12 22:21, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:01:10PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
On 01/11/12 20:09, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:26:49PM +0100, Stephan Bärwolf wrote:
From 2168285ffb30716f30e129c3ce98ce42d19c4d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
and not like Intel. (which would have to #UD ...)
While the crash is bad (esp. for admins using VMs to isolate),
because every unpriv. user can execute 0f05 - the misbehaviour
with GenuineIntel-cpuid is just a blemish.
Best regards,
Stephan Bärwolf
Stephan Baerwolf (2):
KVM: extend struct
From c603d51a02539c89dec05fd54de336b282b1cc12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:25:59 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: extend struct x86_emulate_ops with get_cpuid
In order to be able to proceed checks on CPU-specific properties
From 2168285ffb30716f30e129c3ce98ce42d19c4d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Baerwolf stephan.baerw...@tu-ilmenau.de
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 02:03:47 +
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: fix missing illegal instruction-trap in
protected modes
On hosts without this patch, 32bit guests will crash
12 matches
Mail list logo
