On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:11:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:33:40 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
virtio net used to unlink skbs from send queues on error,
but ever since 48925e372f04f5e35fec6269127c62b2c71ab794
we do not do this. This causes guest data corruption and
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:11:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:33:40 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
virtio net used to unlink skbs from send queues on error,
but ever since 48925e372f04f5e35fec6269127c62b2c71ab794
we do not do this. This causes guest data corruption and
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:11:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:33:40 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
virtio net used to unlink skbs from send queues on error,
but ever since 48925e372f04f5e35fec6269127c62b2c71ab794
we do not do this. This causes guest data corruption and
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 08:42:43PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:11:51PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:33:40 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
virtio net used to unlink skbs from send queues on error,
but ever since
From: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:07:13 +0200
Another, and hopefully the last, note, is that
git-am can only handle Subject/From lines
at the beginning of the message.
So git style of the mail would be
...
I think it's weird. We could invent some kind of
virtio net used to unlink skbs from send queues on error,
but ever since 48925e372f04f5e35fec6269127c62b2c71ab794
we do not do this. This causes guest data corruption and crashes
with vhost since net core can requeue the skb or free it without
it being taken off the list.
This patch fixes this by
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:33:40 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
virtio net used to unlink skbs from send queues on error,
but ever since 48925e372f04f5e35fec6269127c62b2c71ab794
we do not do this. This causes guest data corruption and crashes
with vhost since net core can requeue the skb or free it
