Just found another issue:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 05:33:29PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
[...]
@@ -970,27 +974,24 @@ static void numa_add(const char *optarg)
}
node_mem[nodenr] = sval;
}
-if (get_param_value(option, 128, cpus, optarg) == 0) {
-Original Message-
From: Eduardo Habkost [mailto:ehabk...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 1:01 PM
To: Vinod, Chegu
Cc: Hada, Craig M; Hull, Jim; qemu-de...@nongnu.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Fixes related to processing of qemu's
-numa option
(removed r...@hydra11.kio from CC)
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:45:27PM -0700, Chegu Vinod wrote:
From: root r...@hydra11.kio
Changes since v1:
- Use bitmap functions that are already in qemu (instead
of cpu_set_t macro's)
- Added a check for endvalue = max_cpus.
-
From: root r...@hydra11.kio
Changes since v1:
- Use bitmap functions that are already in qemu (instead
of cpu_set_t macro's)
- Added a check for endvalue = max_cpus.
- Fix to address the round-robbing assignment (for the case
when cpu's are not explicitly specified)
