On 05/31/10 09:46, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
Posting for early
On 05/30/10 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
It looks pretty good to me, however one thing I have been thinking of
while reading through it:
Rather than storing a pointer within the ring struct, pointing into a
position within the
On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
Posting for early flames/comments.
Sorry, not without some
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:16:42PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 05:20:35 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:36:00AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 05/30/10 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
It looks pretty good to me, however one thing I have been thinking of
while reading through it:
Rather than storing a
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:56:54AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 05/26/10 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
On 05/26/10 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
Posting for early flames/comments.
Generally, the Host end of the
On 05/26/2010 10:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
Posting for early flames/comments.
Generally, the Host end of the
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:07:52PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
I missed the spec patch, can you repost it?
Still work in progress, but here it is.
Note I am still debating with myself whether we should split
avail idx and flags into separate cache lines.
diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx
