On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
>> Label-less DIMMs are tested as part of the unit test [1] and the
>> "memmap=nn!ss" kernel parameter that registers a persistent-memory
>> address range without a DIMM. What error do you see when label
>>
On 10/13/2015 02:36 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 11:38 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 12:36
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/2015 11:38 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Xiao Guangrong
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2015 12:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On 10/13/2015 11:38 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
On 10/13/2015 12:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static namespaces can be emitted without a label. Linux needs this to
support existing "label-less" bare metal
On 10/13/2015 12:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
On 10/11/2015 05:17 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
[..]
== Test ==
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Xiao Guangrong
wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 12:36 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Static namespaces can be emitted without a label. Linux needs this to
>> support existing "label-less" bare metal NVDIMMs.
>
>
> This is Linux specific? As i