Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
I'd be much more open to changing the default mode to cache=none FWIW since
the
risk of data loss there is much, much lower.
I think people said that they'd
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
I'd be much more open to changing the default mode to cache=none FWIW
since the
risk of data loss there is much, much
On 10/26/2011 10:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Sector size is a device property.
If the user asks for a 4K sector disk, and the backend can't support
that, we need to reject the configuration. Just like we reject
read-only backends for read/write disks.
Isn't it the other way round, i.e.
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
I'd be much more open to changing the default mode
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
On 10/26/2011 10:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Sector size is a device property.
If the user asks for a 4K sector disk, and the backend can't support
that, we need to reject the configuration. Just like we reject
read-only backends for read/write
Am 26.10.2011 11:57, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
I'd
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 11:57, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin
Am 26.10.2011 13:39, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 11:57, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:48:12AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb
On 10/25/2011 10:32 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
I would still like to cache the default cache mode (probably to
cache=writeback). We don't allow
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
I would still like to cache the default cache mode
On 10/25/2011 03:05 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
I would
On 10/25/2011 08:18 AM, Dor Laor wrote:
On 10/25/2011 03:05 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
-
Am 25.10.2011 15:18, schrieb Dor Laor:
[...] it would be nice to mark a VM un-migratable [snip]
Speaking of which, I'm working on the missing migration support for AHCI
but fear I won't quite make it for the Nov 1 deadline.
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg,
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
I would
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
-
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Hi
Please send in any
On 25.10.2011, at 17:32, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 16:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 08:56 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 25.10.2011 15:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 10/25/2011 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 24.10.2011 13:35, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
On
On 24 October 2011 12:35, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
Things on my list, FWIW:
* current target-arm pullreq
* PL041 support (needs
Am 24.10.2011 14:02, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 24 October 2011 12:35, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
I also think that it's somewhat
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:02:05 +0100
Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 24 October 2011 12:35, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/24/2011 01:04 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- What's left to merge for 1.0.
21 matches
Mail list logo
