Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 07/27/2010 10:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolfkw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws
Am 28.07.2010 13:22, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 07/27/2010 10:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolfkw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 28.07.2010 13:22, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On 07/27/2010 10:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
Raw can't be probed safely, by its very nature. For historical reasons,
we try anyway. I think we
On 07/27/10 02:13, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 18:28 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/26/2010 05:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/26/2010 04:28 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
- 0.13 update
I'll pre-empt the
Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
- any additional input on probed_raw?
Isn't it a fait accompli? I stopped providing input when commit
79368c81 appeared.
No.
Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
- any additional input on probed_raw?
Isn't it a fait accompli? I stopped providing input when commit
On 07/27/2010 10:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolfkw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
- any additional input on
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:28:04AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 07/27/2010 10:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Kevin Wolfkw...@redhat.com writes:
Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony
On 07/27/2010 06:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we add docs/deprecated-features.txt, schedule removal for at least
1 year in the future, and put a warning in the code that prints
whenever raw is probed, I think I could warm up to this.
Since libvirt should be insulating users from this
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:17:06PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/27/2010 06:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we add docs/deprecated-features.txt, schedule removal for at least
1 year in the future, and put a warning in the code that prints
whenever raw is probed, I think I could warm up
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:17:06PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/27/2010 06:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we add docs/deprecated-features.txt, schedule removal for at least
1 year in the future, and put a warning in the code that
On 07/27/2010 07:29 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
QEMU stderr+out is already recorded in /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/$GUESTNAME.log
along with the env variables and argv used to spawn it. Or did you mean
provide an API + virsh command /virt-manager UI for accessing the logs ?
I read that to
* Avi Kivity (a...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 07/27/2010 07:29 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
QEMU stderr+out is already recorded in /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/$GUESTNAME.log
along with the env variables and argv used to spawn it. Or did you mean
provide an API + virsh command /virt-manager UI for accessing
On 07/27/2010 07:36 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
If things work there's no reason for the user to go look at the
logs. An exclamation point invites clicking.
Even better would be an ABRT plugin, so if something goes
(marginally) wrong, the siren pops up and you're invited to report
the bug.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 09:29:13AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:17:06PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/27/2010 06:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we add docs/deprecated-features.txt, schedule removal for at
On 07/27/2010 07:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I read that to mean...propagate stderr from qemu to be right in front of
the user. So that's output from virsh or in virt-manager. Trouble is,
that's only useful (at best) when starting a guest. Perhaps some
virt-manager thing (an
On 07/27/2010 07:47 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/27/2010 07:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I read that to mean...propagate stderr from qemu to be right in
front of
the user. So that's output from virsh or in virt-manager. Trouble is,
that's only useful (at best) when starting a guest.
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:42:34PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/27/2010 07:36 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
If things work there's no reason for the user to go look at the
logs. An exclamation point invites clicking.
Even better would be an ABRT plugin, so if something goes
(marginally)
On 07/27/2010 08:01 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
It's annoying to us old hands, but it does give that nice integrated
system feel that we're missing, and it works even if virt-manager is in
the background (or if you don't use virt-manager at all).
Given that there's a kerneloops pluging
19 matches
Mail list logo
