Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Rename irq_state to irq_pending

2014-06-22 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 2014-06-14 21:51, Christoffer Dall wrote: The irq_state field on the distributor struct is ambiguous in its meaning; the comment says it's the level of the input put, but that doesn't make much sense for edge-triggered interrupts. The code actually uses this state variable to check if the

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Rename irq_state to irq_pending

2014-06-18 Thread Eric Auger
On 06/14/2014 10:51 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: The irq_state field on the distributor struct is ambiguous in its meaning; the comment says it's the level of the input put, but that doesn't make much sense for edge-triggered interrupts. The code actually uses this state variable to check if

[RFC PATCH 1/6] arm/arm64: KVM: Rename irq_state to irq_pending

2014-06-14 Thread Christoffer Dall
The irq_state field on the distributor struct is ambiguous in its meaning; the comment says it's the level of the input put, but that doesn't make much sense for edge-triggered interrupts. The code actually uses this state variable to check if the interrupt is in the pending state on the