Hi,
On 10/20/15 19:27, Janusz wrote:
> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 20:46, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
>> On 10/15/15 18:53, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>>> Laszlo,
>>>
>>> There is already a PCD for this timeout that is used by CpuMpPei.
>>>
>>> gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds
>>>
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 20:46, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
> On 10/15/15 18:53, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
>> Laszlo,
>>
>> There is already a PCD for this timeout that is used by CpuMpPei.
>>
>> gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuApInitTimeOutInMicroSeconds
>>
>> I noticed that CpuDxe is using a hard coded
W dniu 20.10.2015 o 19:44, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/20/15 19:27, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 20:46, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
>>> On 10/15/15 18:53, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
Laszlo,
There is already a PCD for this timeout that is used by CpuMpPei.
On 10/16/15 05:05, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/2015 12:18 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> CC'ing Jordan and Chen Fan.
>>
>> On 10/15/15 09:10, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
>
> Well, the bug may be not in KVM. When this bug happened, i saw OVMF
> only checked 1 CPU out, there is the log from OVMF's debug input:
>
> Flushing GCD
> Flushing GCD
> Flushing GCD
> Flushing GCD
> Flushing GCD
> Flushing GCD
>
On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
Well, the bug may be not in KVM. When this bug happened, i saw OVMF
only checked 1 CPU out, there is the log
On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
Well, the bug may be not in KVM. When this bug happened, i saw OVMF
only checked 1 CPU out, there is the log from OVMF's debug input:
Flushing GCD
Flushing GCD
Flushing GCD
Flushing GCD
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 09:10, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
>
> Well, the bug may be not
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, the bug may be not in KVM. When this bug happened, i saw OVMF
>>> only checked 1 CPU out, there is the log from OVMF's debug input:
CC'ing Jordan and Chen Fan.
On 10/15/15 09:10, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 15.10.2015 o 08:41, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2015 02:19 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 15.10.2015 o 06:19, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
>
>
; Alex
>Williamson; Chen Fan; Paolo Bonzini; Wanpeng Li
>Subject: Re: [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is
>completely disabled
>
>CC'ing Jordan and Chen Fan.
>
>On 10/15/15 09:10, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/15/2015 02:58 PM, Janusz w
AM
>> To: Xiao Guangrong
>> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; Justen, Jordan L; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Alex
>> Williamson; Chen Fan; Paolo Bonzini; Wanpeng Li
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] KVM: MTRR: fix memory type handling if MTRR is
>> completely disabled
>>
>> CC'ing
W dniu 14.10.2015 o 10:32, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
>>> I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
>>> usage when something happen in it like booting system. once, my virtual
I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
usage when something happen in it like booting system. once, my virtual
machine hang and I couln't even get my mouse / keyboard back from qemu.
When I did vga passthrough, I didn't get any video output, and cpu usage
was also
W dniu 14.10.2015 o 11:13, Janusz pisze:
> W dniu 14.10.2015 o 10:32, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>>
>> On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
usage when something happen
On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
usage when something happen in it like booting system. once, my virtual
machine hang and I couln't even get my mouse / keyboard back from
W dniu 14.10.2015 o 10:32, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
>
> On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
>>> I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
>>> usage when something happen in it like booting system. once, my virtual
On 10/14/15 10:32, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
>>> I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
>>> usage when something happen in it like booting system. once, my virtual
>>>
On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
usage when something happen in it like booting system. once, my virtual
machine hang and I couln't even get my mouse / keyboard back from qemu.
When I did vga passthrough, I didn't get
On 10/14/2015 05:47 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 10/14/15 10:32, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
usage when something happen in it like booting
On 10/15/2015 02:08 AM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 14.10.2015 o 10:32, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
On 10/14/2015 04:24 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/14/2015 03:37 PM, Janusz wrote:
I was able to run my virtual machine with this, but had very high cpu
usage when something happen in it like booting
Janusz,
Could you please try this:
$ git diff
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 185fc16..bdd564f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4957,12 +4957,14 @@ static int handle_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu)
On 10/11/2015 04:07 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/02/2015 10:38 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 01.10.2015 o 16:18, Paolo Bonzini pisze:
On 01/10/2015 16:12, Janusz wrote:
Now, I can also add, that the problem is only when I allow VM to use
more than one core, so with option for example:
On 10/13/2015 02:20 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/11/2015 04:07 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/02/2015 10:38 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 01.10.2015 o 16:18, Paolo Bonzini pisze:
On 01/10/2015 16:12, Janusz wrote:
Now, I can also add, that the problem is only when I allow VM to use
On 10/02/2015 10:38 PM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 01.10.2015 o 16:18, Paolo Bonzini pisze:
On 01/10/2015 16:12, Janusz wrote:
Now, I can also add, that the problem is only when I allow VM to use
more than one core, so with option for example:
-smp 8,cores=4,threads=2,sockets=1 and other
W dniu 01.10.2015 o 16:18, Paolo Bonzini pisze:
>
> On 01/10/2015 16:12, Janusz wrote:
>> Now, I can also add, that the problem is only when I allow VM to use
>> more than one core, so with option for example:
>> -smp 8,cores=4,threads=2,sockets=1 and other combinations like -smp
>> 4,threads=1
Now, I can also add, that the problem is only when I allow VM to use
more than one core, so with option for example:
-smp 8,cores=4,threads=2,sockets=1 and other combinations like -smp
4,threads=1 its not working, and without it I am always running VM
without problems
Any ideas what can it be?
On 01/10/2015 16:12, Janusz wrote:
> Now, I can also add, that the problem is only when I allow VM to use
> more than one core, so with option for example:
> -smp 8,cores=4,threads=2,sockets=1 and other combinations like -smp
> 4,threads=1 its not working, and without it I am always running VM
On 18/09/2015 11:37, Janusz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writting about this patch that was posted by Xiao:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119044.html and this:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119045.html
> I've tested both kernel 4.2 and 4.3 and problem still exists when I use
> OVMF
W dniu 22.09.2015 o 10:59, Paolo Bonzini pisze:
>
> On 18/09/2015 11:37, Janusz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am writting about this patch that was posted by Xiao:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119044.html and this:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119045.html
>> I've tested both kernel
W dniu 21.09.2015 o 04:51, Xiao Guangrong pisze:
>
> Thanks for your report and analysis, Janusz!
>
> On 09/19/2015 01:48 AM, Janusz wrote:
>> W dniu 18.09.2015 o 12:07, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
>>> On 09/18/15 11:37, Janusz wrote:
Hello,
I am writting about this patch that was posted by
On 9/21/15 10:51 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Thanks for your report and analysis, Janusz!
On 09/19/2015 01:48 AM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 18.09.2015 o 12:07, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
On 09/18/15 11:37, Janusz wrote:
Hello,
I am writting about this patch that was posted by Xiao:
On 09/21/2015 11:30 AM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
On 9/21/15 10:51 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Thanks for your report and analysis, Janusz!
On 09/19/2015 01:48 AM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 18.09.2015 o 12:07, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
On 09/18/15 11:37, Janusz wrote:
Hello,
I am writting about this patch
Thanks for your report and analysis, Janusz!
On 09/19/2015 01:48 AM, Janusz wrote:
W dniu 18.09.2015 o 12:07, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
On 09/18/15 11:37, Janusz wrote:
Hello,
I am writting about this patch that was posted by Xiao:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119044.html and this:
On 09/18/15 11:37, Janusz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writting about this patch that was posted by Xiao:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119044.html and this:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119045.html
> I've tested both kernel 4.2 and 4.3 and problem still exists when I use
> OVMF -
W dniu 18.09.2015 o 12:07, Laszlo Ersek pisze:
> On 09/18/15 11:37, Janusz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am writting about this patch that was posted by Xiao:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119044.html and this:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg119045.html
>> I've tested both kernel 4.2
36 matches
Mail list logo
