Am Monday 28 March 2011 schrieb David Martin:
- Original Message -
On 3/28/11 2:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Marcin M. Jessa wrote:
[...]
One LUN per image allows you to implement failover, LVM doesn't (but
cluster-LVM does). I recommend using one LUN
That's what CLVM is for, it propagates the volume changes to every member of
the 'cluster'.
David Martin
- Original Message -
Am Monday 28 March 2011 schrieb David Martin:
- Original Message -
On 3/28/11 2:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Marcin M.
Am Thursday 31 March 2011 schrieben Sie:
That's what CLVM is for, it propagates the volume changes to every member
of the 'cluster'.
Oh, right. I didn't know about clvm until now.
It sounds very promising though, certainly better than working with the
proprietary API of whoever your
On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Marcin M. Jessa wrote:
Hi.
Over the last several days I've been reading, asking questions,
searching the Internet to find a viable HA stack for Ubuntu with KVM
virtualization and shared iSCSI storage. And I'm nearly as confused as
when I started.
Basically I'm
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Marcin M. Jessa wrote:
Hi.
Over the last several days I've been reading, asking questions,
searching the Internet to find a viable HA stack for Ubuntu with
KVM
virtualization and shared iSCSI
On 3/28/11 2:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Marcin M. Jessa wrote:
[...]
One LUN per image allows you to implement failover, LVM doesn't (but
cluster-LVM does). I recommend using one LUN per image; it's much simpler.
Some people say Use one LUN, it's easier and use CLVM.
On 3/28/11 6:21 PM, David Martin wrote:
[...]
CLVM was more complicated initially but is pretty once we got through
that. Having to hack around in the SAN manager and then going to the
hosts to mess with the multipath configs etc gets old fast. However if
your setup is pretty static then I
- Original Message -
On 3/28/11 2:46 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/25/2011 10:26 PM, Marcin M. Jessa wrote:
[...]
One LUN per image allows you to implement failover, LVM doesn't (but
cluster-LVM does). I recommend using one LUN per image; it's much
simpler.
Some people say
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Marcin M. Jessa li...@yazzy.org wrote:
How is OCFS2 compared to CLVM?
different layers, can't compare.
CLVM (aka cLVM) is the cluster version of LVM, the volume manager.
the addition of a userspace lock manager lets you do all volume
management (create/delete
Hi.
Over the last several days I've been reading, asking questions,
searching the Internet to find a viable HA stack for Ubuntu with KVM
virtualization and shared iSCSI storage. And I'm nearly as confused as
when I started.
Basically I'm trying to build a KVM enviroment with an iSCSI SAN
10 matches
Mail list logo