On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 17:53 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
So at this point, I think it's a mistake to include raw socket support.
If the goal is to improve networking usability such that it just works
as a root user, let's incorporate a default network script that creates
a bridge or
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 05:53:56PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I would be much more inclined to consider
taking raw and improving the performance long term if guest-host
networking worked. This appears to be a fundamental limitation though
and I think it's something that will forever
Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
Can't we bind the raw socket to the tap interface instead of the
physical interface and allow the bridge config to work.
But why use the raw interface instead of tap directly.
Let me summarize the discussion so far:
Raw sockets
Pros:
o User specifies a network
