2015-12-17 13:55-0600, Andrew Jones:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> Might be interesting and hopefully won't break too many scripts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - don't print "0 unexpected failures" in run_tests'
2015-12-17 14:06-0600, Andrew Jones:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> Might be interesting and hopefully won't break too many scripts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - don't print "0 unexpected failures" in run_tests'
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Might be interesting and hopefully won't break too many scripts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
> ---
> v2:
> - don't print "0 unexpected failures" in run_tests' summary. [Drew]
>(This could have been done
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> Might be interesting and hopefully won't break too many scripts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář
> ---
> v2:
> - don't print "0 unexpected failures" in run_tests' summary. [Drew]
>(This could have been done