On 03/16/2010 02:20 AM, Jason wrote:
In comparing KVM 2.6.31.6b to XenServer 5.5.0, it seems KVM has fewer overall
VMREADs and VMWRITEs, but there are a lot of VMWRITEs to Host FS_SEL, Host
GS_SEL, Host FS_BASE, and Host GS_BASE that don't appear in Xen.
Ugh, these should definitely be
Avi Kivity avi at redhat.com writes:
On 03/16/2010 02:20 AM, Jason wrote:
In comparing KVM 2.6.31.6b to XenServer 5.5.0, it seems KVM has fewer
overall
VMREADs and VMWRITEs, but there are a lot of VMWRITEs to Host FS_SEL, Host
GS_SEL, Host FS_BASE, and Host GS_BASE that don't appear
On 03/16/2010 06:33 PM, Jason wrote:
Avi Kivityaviat redhat.com writes:
On 03/16/2010 02:20 AM, Jason wrote:
In comparing KVM 2.6.31.6b to XenServer 5.5.0, it seems KVM has fewer overall
VMREADs and VMWRITEs, but there are a lot of VMWRITEs to Host FS_SEL, Host
GS_SEL, Host
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful for
doing device assignment to nested guests,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could
On 03/15/2010 02:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:53:13AM -0700, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
for doing device assignment to nested guests, which could make
testing a lot easier.
Our experiments show that nested device assignment is pretty much
required for I/O
On 03/15/2010 07:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 02:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
On 03/15/2010 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
for doing device assignment to nested guests, which could make
testing a lot easier.
Our experiments show that nested device assignment is
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
for doing device assignment to nested guests, which could make
testing a lot easier.
Our experiments show that
On 03/15/2010 08:24 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:11:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
for doing device assignment to nested guests, which could
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:03:11PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 05:53:13AM -0700, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer
On 03/15/2010 03:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2010 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
for doing device assignment to nested guests, which could make
testing a lot easier.
Our
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 08:14:29AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2010 07:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 02:38 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:25:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/10/2010 11:30 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for
Avi Kivity avi at redhat.com writes:
On 03/15/2010 03:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2010 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Your guest wasn't doing a zillion VMREADs and VMWRITEs every exit.
I plan to reduce VMREAD/VMWRITE overhead for kvm, but not much we can
do for other guests.
On 03/15/2010 10:06 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2010 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
for doing device assignment to nested guests,
On 03/16/2010 03:21 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2010 10:06 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/15/2010 08:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 03/15/2010 03:03 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I will add another project - iommu emulation. Could be very useful
Hi Luiz. Around the time when I introduced the new Asynchronous monitor
command API we had talked about converting all commands to use this new
API so that we can cut down on duplicate code paths and confusing code.
I would like to propose this as a GSoC project idea. Do you think it
should
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:11:31 -0600
Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Luiz. Around the time when I introduced the new Asynchronous monitor
command API we had talked about converting all commands to use this new
API so that we can cut down on duplicate code paths and confusing code.
I would
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 12:22 -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:11:31 -0600
Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Luiz. Around the time when I introduced the new Asynchronous monitor
command API we had talked about converting all commands to use this new
API so that we
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:38:47 -0600
Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 12:22 -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:11:31 -0600
Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Luiz. Around the time when I introduced the new Asynchronous monitor
command API we
On 03/12/2010 09:56 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Once the student(s) have gone through the trouble to familiarize
themselves with the monitor code, they would be well-positioned to
complete this extra bit. How difficult do you imagine it will be to
convert the remaining commands over to QObject?
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:36:53 -0600
Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 03/12/2010 09:56 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Once the student(s) have gone through the trouble to familiarize
themselves with the monitor code, they would be well-positioned to
complete this extra bit.
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:30 -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
Our wiki page for the Summer of Code 2010 is doing quite well:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Google_Summer_of_Code_2010
Just to let you guys know that I'm going to give a talk at the local
university (Unicamp) about kvm autotest,
26 matches
Mail list logo