On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:49:25PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:25:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> [cc: John Stultz -- maybe you have ideas on how this should best
> >> integrate
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 02:49:25PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> > (busy spin is equally problematic as IPI for realtime guests).
>>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:25:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> [cc: John Stultz -- maybe you have ideas on how this should best
>> integrate with the core code]
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marcelo
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:25:11PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> [cc: John Stultz -- maybe you have ideas on how this should best
> integrate with the core code]
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:27:13AM -0800, Andy
[cc: John Stultz -- maybe you have ideas on how this should best
integrate with the core code]
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:27:13AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:27:13AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:12:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Marcelo Tosatti
> >>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:12:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Marcelo Tosatti
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:33:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 05:12:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:33:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Marcelo Tosatti
> >>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> [cc: John Stultz -- maybe you have ideas on how this should best
> integrate with the core code]
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:27:13AM
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:17:16AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14/12/2015 23:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>> >
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:17:16AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini
GOn Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:31:10PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:44:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/12/2015 22:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > I'm still not
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:33:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:17:16AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Andy Lutomirski
> >>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:33:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:17:16AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 14/12/2015 23:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > RAW TSC NTP corrected TSC
>> > t0 10 10
>> > t1 20 19.99
>> > t2 30
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/12/2015 23:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> > RAW TSC NTP corrected TSC
>>> > t0 10
On 14/12/2015 23:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > RAW TSC NTP corrected TSC
> > t0 10 10
> > t1 20 19.99
> > t2 30 29.98
> > t3 40 39.97
> > t4 50
On 11/12/2015 22:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I'm still not seeing the issue.
>
> The formula is:
>
> (((rdtsc - pvti->tsc_timestamp) * pvti->tsc_to_system_mul) >>
> pvti->tsc_shift) + pvti->system_time
>
> Obviously, if you reset pvti->tsc_timestamp to the current tsc value
> after
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:57:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> I'm trying to clean up kvmclock and I can't get it to work at all. My
> >>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:07:21AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:57:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti
> >>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:57:23PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:44:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/12/2015 22:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I'm still not seeing the issue.
> >
> > The formula is:
> >
> > (((rdtsc - pvti->tsc_timestamp) * pvti->tsc_to_system_mul) >>
> > pvti->tsc_shift) + pvti->system_time
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:44:15PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/2015 22:57, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > I'm still not seeing the issue.
>> >
>> > The formula is:
>> >
>> > (((rdtsc -
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I'm trying to clean up kvmclock and I can't get it to work at all. My
> host is 4.4.0-rc3-ish on a Skylake laptop that has a working TSC.
>
> If I boot an SMP (2 vcpus) guest, tracing says:
>
> qemu-system-x86-2517 [001]
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 02:27:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 09/12/2015 22:49, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I'm trying to clean up kvmclock and I can't get it to work at all. My
> host is 4.4.0-rc3-ish on a Skylake laptop that has a working TSC.
>
> If I boot an SMP (2 vcpus) guest, tracing says:
>
> qemu-system-x86-2517 [001]
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:10:59PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> I'm trying to clean up kvmclock and I can't get it to work at all. My
>> host is 4.4.0-rc3-ish on a Skylake laptop that has a working TSC.
>>
>> If I
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 09/12/2015 22:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> Can we please stop making kvmclock more complex? It's a beast right
>> now, and not in a good way. It's far too tangled with the vclock
>> machinery on both the host
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 09/12/2015 22:49, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/12/2015 22:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Can we please stop making kvmclock
On 09/12/2015 23:27, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 09/12/2015 22:49, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/12/2015 22:10, Andy
On 09/12/2015 22:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Can we please stop making kvmclock more complex? It's a beast right
> now, and not in a good way. It's far too tangled with the vclock
> machinery on both the host and guest sides, the pvclock stuff is not
> well thought out (even in principle in
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/12/2015 22:49, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/12/2015 22:49, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/12/2015 22:10, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> Can we please stop making kvmclock more complex? It's a beast right
>>> now, and not in a good way. It's far too
33 matches
Mail list logo