On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 08:00 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 05:20:14PM -0700, Shirley Ma wrote:
This patch doesn't seem to help guest TX queue overrun.
Just making sure: what exactly was tested?
You did combine this with a vhost-net and qemu patches, right?
I
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 16:49 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
But if one side outruns the other, it does a lot of unnecessary work
notifying/interrupting it over and over again before the host/guest
gets
a chance to shut notifications/interrupts off. Hence the last_used
publishing patch (Xen does
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:49:26PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
But if one side outruns the other, it does a lot of unnecessary work
notifying/interrupting it over and over again before the host/guest gets
a chance to shut notifications/interrupts off. Hence the last_used
publishing patch
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:46:36 -0800, Shirley Ma mashi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Since we have lots of performance discussions about virtio_net and vhost
communication. I think it's better to have a common understandings of
the code first, then we can seek the right directions to improve it. We
also
Since we have lots of performance discussions about virtio_net and vhost
communication. I think it's better to have a common understandings of
the code first, then we can seek the right directions to improve it. We
also need to collect more statistics data on both virtio and vhost.
Let's look at
