On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 16:46 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/26/2009 03:35 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I just tried testing tip of kvm.git, but unfortunately I think I might
be hitting a different problem, where processes run 100% in kernel
mode. In my case, cpus 9 and 13 were stuck, running
On 11/26/2009 03:35 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I just tried testing tip of kvm.git, but unfortunately I think I might
be hitting a different problem, where processes run 100% in kernel
mode. In my case, cpus 9 and 13 were stuck, running qemu processes.
A stack backtrace for both cpus are
On 11/26/2009 03:35 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
NMI backtrace for cpu 9
CPU 9:
Modules linked in: tun sunrpc af_packet bridge stp ipv6 binfmt_misc
dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath scsi_dh dm_mod kvm_intel
kvm uinput sr_mod cdrom ata_generic pata_acpi ata_piix joydev libata
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
11/01/2009 08:31 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Here is the code in question:
3ae7: 75 05 jne
3aeevmx_vcpu_run+0x26a
3ae9: 0f 01 c2vmlaunch
3aec: eb 03 jmp
Hello,
11/26/2009 10:35 AM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I just tried testing tip of kvm.git, but unfortunately I think I might
be hitting a different problem, where processes run 100% in kernel mode.
In my case, cpus 9 and 13 were stuck, running qemu processes. A stack
backtrace for both cpus are
Hello,
11/01/2009 08:31 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Here is the code in question:
3ae7: 75 05 jne
3aeevmx_vcpu_run+0x26a
3ae9: 0f 01 c2vmlaunch
3aec: eb 03 jmp
3af1vmx_vcpu_run+0x26d
Hello,
Avi Kivity wrote:
Only, that merge doesn't change virt/kvm or arch/x86/kvm.
Tejun, anything known bad about that merge? ada3fa15 kills kvm.
Nothing rings a bell at the moment. How does it kill kvm? One big
difference caused by that merge is use of sparse areas near the top of
On 11/01/2009 12:00 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Avi Kivity wrote:
Only, that merge doesn't change virt/kvm or arch/x86/kvm.
Tejun, anything known bad about that merge? ada3fa15 kills kvm.
Nothing rings a bell at the moment. How does it kill kvm? One big
difference caused by that
Hello,
Avi Kivity wrote:
We get a page fault immediately (next instruction) after returning from
the guest when running with oprofile. The page fault address does not
match anything the instruction does, so presumably it is one of the
accesses the processor performs in order to service an
On 11/01/2009 12:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Avi Kivity wrote:
We get a page fault immediately (next instruction) after returning from
the guest when running with oprofile. The page fault address does not
match anything the instruction does, so presumably it is one of the
accesses the
On 10/30/2009 08:07 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I have finally bisected and isolated this to the following commit:
ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f
http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f
Merge branch 'for-linus' of
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/30/2009 08:07 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
I have finally bisected and isolated this to the following commit:
ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f
http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm.git;a=commit;h=ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f
Merge branch
On 10/31/2009 06:25 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
5579 is not the preceding commit, it is the merged branch:
commit ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f
Merge: 2f82af0 5579fd7
Author: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Tue Sep 15 09:39:44 2009 -0700
Merge branch
On 10/31/2009 06:32 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/31/2009 06:25 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
5579 is not the preceding commit, it is the merged branch:
commit ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f
Merge: 2f82af0 5579fd7
Author: Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org
Date: Tue Sep 15
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:18 -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:10 +0900, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/13/2009 11:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
Look at the address where vmx_vcpu_run starts, add 0x26d, and show the
surrounding code.
Thinking about it, it probably _is_
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:10 +0900, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/13/2009 11:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
Look at the address where vmx_vcpu_run starts, add 0x26d, and show the
surrounding code.
Thinking about it, it probably _is_ what you showed, due to module page
alignment. But please
On 10/13/2009 11:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
Look at the address where vmx_vcpu_run starts, add 0x26d, and show the
surrounding code.
Thinking about it, it probably _is_ what you showed, due to module page
alignment. But please verify this; I can't reconcile the fault address
On 10/12/2009 08:42 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 07:19 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/09/2009 10:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
This is on latest master branch on kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git, running
12 Windows Server2008 VMs, and using oprofile. I ran again without
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 08:50 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/12/2009 08:42 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 07:19 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/09/2009 10:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
This is on latest master branch on kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git, running
12
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 08:50:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/12/2009 08:42 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 07:19 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/09/2009 10:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
This is on latest master branch on kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git, running
12
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 07:19 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/09/2009 10:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
This is on latest master branch on kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git, running
12 Windows Server2008 VMs, and using oprofile. I ran again without
oprofile and did not get the BUG. I am wondering if
On 10/09/2009 10:04 PM, Andrew Theurer wrote:
This is on latest master branch on kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git, running
12 Windows Server2008 VMs, and using oprofile. I ran again without
oprofile and did not get the BUG. I am wondering if anyone else is
seeing this.
Thanks,
-Andrew
Oct 9
This is on latest master branch on kvm.git and qemu-kvm.git, running 12
Windows Server2008 VMs, and using oprofile. I ran again without
oprofile and did not get the BUG. I am wondering if anyone else is
seeing this.
Thanks,
-Andrew
Oct 9 11:55:13 virtvictory-eth0 kernel: BUG: unable to
23 matches
Mail list logo
