On 06/03/2011 05:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -709,7 +709,9 @@ struct perf_buffer {
struct perf_sample_data;
-typedef void (*perf_overflow_handler_t)(struct perf_event *, int,
+typedef void
On 06/03/2011 05:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
- counters that have PMI (interrupt) enabled stop counting after the
interrupt is signalled. This is because we need one-shot samples
that keep counting, which perf doesn't support yet
On 06/03/2011 05:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
+static u64 read_gp_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
+{
+ u64 counter, enabled, running;
+
+ counter = pmc-counter;
+
+ if (pmc-perf_event)
+
On 06/03/2011 04:38 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Is there anyone who can point me at the appropriate cage to rattle? I
know it appears to be a netfilter issue, but I don't seem to be able
to get a message to the list (and I am subscribed to it and have been
getting mail for months) and I'm not
On 2011-06-04 19:50, André Weidemann wrote:
Hi,
as mentioned before I have successfully passed a graphics card from a
Linux host to VM using qemu-kvm.
Shortly after starting the VM and before Windows7 initializes the
graphics card, info pci looks like this:
Bus 0, device 4, function
On 04.06.2011, at 18:49, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 17:40 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04.06.2011, at 17:34, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 17:21 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04.06.2011, at 16:19, Sasha Levin wrote:
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 15:48 +0200,
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:07:09PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 04.06.2011, at 12:54, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 04.06.2011, at 12:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
I wrote up 2 virtio-fb implementations
On 05/30/2011 03:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
You are probably right about 1024 CPUs.
Right now i can produce something similar to it: 42 vcpus on a single
CPU:
$ taskse 1 kvm run --cpus 42
And that hangs early on during bootup, around:
[0.236000] Disabled fast string operations
[
Hi Jan,
On 05.06.2011 10:30, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-04 19:50, André Weidemann wrote:
Hi,
as mentioned before I have successfully passed a graphics card from a
Linux host to VM using qemu-kvm.
Shortly after starting the VM and before Windows7 initializes the
graphics card, info pci looks
On 06/03/2011 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct kvm_translation {
struct kvm_interrupt {
/* in */
__u32 irq;
+ __u8 raise;
};
This touches an existing ABI and corrupts the definition of
KVM_INTERRUPT IOCTL. The might exist jurisdictions
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Targets KVM support for Cortex A-15 processors.
Contains no real functionality but all the framework components,
make files, header files and some tracing functionality.
+
+struct kvm_regs {
+ __u32 regs0_7[8]; /* Unbanked regs. (r0 -
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Initializes a blank level-1 translation table for the second stage
translation and handles freeing it as well.
+ start = (unsigned long)kvm,
+ end = start + sizeof(struct kvm);
+ ret = create_hyp_mappings(kvm_hyp_pgd, start,
On 06/03/2011 06:04 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Handles the guest faults in KVM by mapping in corresponding user pages
in the 2nd stage page tables.
+static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
+ gfn_t gfn, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Targets KVM support for Cortex A-15 processors.
Contains no real functionality but all the framework components,
make files, header files and some tracing functionality.
(series review - please have a cover letter in the future for this stuff)
On 05/06/11 16:14, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 04:38 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
Is there anyone who can point me at the appropriate cage to rattle? I
know it appears to be a netfilter issue, but I don't seem to be able
to get a message to the list (and I am subscribed to it and have been
On 06/05/2011 04:45 PM, Brad Campbell wrote:
The mailing list might be set not to send your own mails back to you.
Check the list archive.
Yep, I did that first..
Given the response to previous issues along the same line, it looks a
bit like I just remember not to actually use the system in
On 06/05/2011 03:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
(series review - please have a cover letter in the future for this stuff)
Oh - you did - but in a separate thread. Oh well.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/05/2011 03:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
(series review - please have a cover letter in the future for this stuff)
Oh - you did - but in a separate thread. Oh well.
My internet router decided to reset immediately after
On 2011-06-05 14:21, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct kvm_translation {
struct kvm_interrupt {
/* in */
__u32 irq;
+__u8 raise;
};
This touches an existing ABI and corrupts the definition of
On 06/05/2011 05:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 14:21, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct kvm_translation {
struct kvm_interrupt {
/* in */
__u32 irq;
+__u8 raise;
};
This touches
On 06/05/2011 05:13 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/05/2011 03:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
(series review - please have a cover letter in the future for this stuff)
Oh - you did - but in a separate thread. Oh well.
My
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Initializes a blank level-1 translation table for the second stage
translation and handles freeing it as well.
+ start = (unsigned long)kvm,
+ end = start +
On 06/05/2011 05:50 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Initializes a blank level-1 translation table for the second stage
translation and handles freeing it as well.
+ start
On 2011-06-05 16:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 14:21, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct kvm_translation {
struct kvm_interrupt {
/* in */
__u32 irq;
+
On 2011-06-05 17:10, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Note that with KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING (bad name for ARM...) we can even
choose if an irq line is connected to a kernel-emulated interrupt
controller or to the core's irq input.
Makes some sense: Add
On 06/05/2011 05:53 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:50 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Initializes a blank level-1 translation table for the second stage
translation and
On 06/05/2011 06:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
An additional advantage is that this is a vm ioctl, not a vcpu ioctl, so
no need to interrupt the vcpu thread in userspace in order to queue an
interrupt. Of course, it still happens in the kernel, but it's easier
for userspace to implement its
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:53 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:50 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Initializes a
On 06/05/2011 06:27 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:53 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:50 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Avi Kivitya...@redhat.comwrote:
On
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
Targets KVM support for Cortex A-15 processors.
Contains no real functionality but all the framework components,
make files, header files and some tracing functionality.
+
On 06/05/2011 07:03 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
+
+ /* Banked FIQ registers r8-r12 */
+ if (reg_num= 8reg_num= 12) {
+ if (mode == MODE_FIQ) {
+ reg_idx = reg_num - 8; /* 0=r8, ..., 4=r12 */
+
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2011-06-05 16:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 14:21, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/03/2011 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ struct kvm_translation {
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@web.de wrote:
On 2011-06-05 17:10, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 05:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Note that with KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING (bad name for ARM...) we can even
choose if an irq line is connected to a kernel-emulated interrupt
On 06/05/2011 07:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
An additional advantage is that this is a vm ioctl, not a vcpu ioctl, so
no need to interrupt the vcpu thread in userspace in order to queue an
interrupt. Of course, it still happens in the kernel, but it's easier
for userspace to
On 05.06.2011, at 18:28, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
An additional advantage is that this is a vm ioctl, not a vcpu ioctl, so
no need to interrupt the vcpu thread in userspace in order to queue an
interrupt. Of course, it still happens in the kernel,
On 06/05/2011 07:24 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On ARM, we are talking about IRQs and FIQs, both of which can be
lowered and raised. In other words, four values.
Two lines per cpu, each of which can be raised or lowered.
But instead of this, you want to use KVM_IRQ_LINE and just assume one
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are
you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance).
Using KVM_IRQ_LINE everywhere except s390, not just in x86 and ARM.
An in-kernel MPIC implementation is
On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are
you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance).
Using KVM_IRQ_LINE everywhere except s390, not just in
On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are
you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance).
Using
On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are
you suggesting a new arch-generic
On 2011-06-05 19:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following.
On 05.06.2011, at 19:56, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Could you elaborate
On 2011-06-05 20:00, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:56, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM,
On 05.06.2011, at 20:04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 20:00, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:56, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at
On 2011-06-05 20:12, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 20:04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 20:00, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:56, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-05 19:19,
45 matches
Mail list logo
