On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:07:16PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:50:17AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 06:03:31PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
I was wrong. The cpu_set x offline does send an event to the guest
OS. SeaBIOS even forwards the
Newer versions of dhclient should also be OK: they detect
that checksum is missing in the packet. Try it e.g. with
a recent fedora guest as a client.
I don't have fedora, but with the latest release (4.1.1-P1) on isc.org
it still behaves the same (see output at the bottom).
To solve the
On 09/21/2010 05:37 AM, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 at 09:50:55:
On 09/20/2010 06:44 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
nested vmx: the resurrection. Nice to see it progressing again, but
there's
On 09/20/2010 07:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
static void __vmx_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
u32 idt_vectoring_info,
int instr_len_field,
@@ -3864,9 +3814,6 @@ static void __vmx_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_vmx
*vmx,
Without this BIOS fails to remap 0xf memory from ROM to RAM so writes
to F-segment modify ROM content instead of memory copy. Since QEMU does
not reloads ROMs during reset on next boot modified copy of BIOS is used.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
diff --git a/hw/piix_pci.c
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:36 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Right now there are few pre-defined probes (trace events in QEMU
tracing speak). As I develop I try to be mindful of new ones I create
and whether they would be generally useful. I intend to contribute
more probes and hope others will
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:39:31AM +0800, Xin, Xiaohui wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 7:37 PM
To: Xin, Xiaohui
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
mi...@elte.hu; da...@davemloft.net;
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Rayson Ho r...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:36 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Right now there are few pre-defined probes (trace events in QEMU
tracing speak). As I develop I try to be mindful of new ones I create
and whether they would be
Hello,
We are trying to add CPU hot-plug/unplug capability to KVM. We want to
be able to initiate hot-plug/unplug from a host. Our current schema
works like this:
We have Processor object in DSDT for each potentially available CPU.
Each Processor object has _MAD, _STA, _EJ0. _MAD of present CPU
Am 17.09.2010 18:16, schrieb ext Alex Williamson:
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 17:27 +0200, Bernhard Kohl wrote:
This is necessary because during reboot of a VM the assigned devices
continue DMA transfers which causes memory corruption.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ostlerthomas.ost...@nsn.com
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 08:41:02AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
It seems that rmap entries are under counted.
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton dhi...@gmail.com
---
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/20/2010 07:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
static void __vmx_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
u32 idt_vectoring_info,
int instr_len_field,
@@ -3864,9 +3814,6
On 09/21/2010 05:36 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:56:50PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/20/2010 07:30 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
static void __vmx_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
u32 idt_vectoring_info,
On 09/20/2010 06:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:45PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
This allows us to reuse them from the kvm support code.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com
I would rather all dealings with MSI-X table stayed in one place. All we
need is
On 09/20/2010 07:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:49PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Target-specific definitions need to be qualified with NEED_CPU_H so kvm.h
can be included from non-target-specific files.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivitya...@redhat.com
Long term,
On 09/20/2010 07:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important patch is the
last one, which allows msix.o to be part of non-target-specific build.
I actually thoought this later
I've put up a wiki page with a kvm networking todo list,
mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope
to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing
in KVM:
http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/NetworkingTodo
This page could cover all networking related activity in KVM,
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 06:05:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/20/2010 07:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
This cleans up msix/kvm integration a bit. The really important patch is
the
last one, which allows msix.o to be
It doesn't really matter, but if we spin, we should spin in a more relaxed
manner. This way, if something goes wrong at least it won't contribute to
global warming.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
For a while (how long?) reboots with active guests are broken on Intel hosts.
This patch set fixes the problem.
Avi Kivity (2):
KVM: Fix reboot on Intel hosts
KVM: cpu_relax() during spin waiting for reboot
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
When we reboot, we disable vmx extensions or otherwise INIT gets blocked.
If a task on another cpu hits a vmx instruction, it will fault if vmx is
disabled. We trap that to avoid a nasty oops and spin until the reboot
completes.
Problem is, we sleep with interrupts disabled. This blocks
Nested VMX
- looking for forward progress and better collaboration between the
Intel and IBM teams
- needs more review (not a new issue)
- use cases
- work todo
- merge baseline patch
- looks pretty good
- review is finding mostly small things at this point
- need some correctness
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:11:30PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
On 09/20/2010 05:38 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 02:38:15PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
Negate the effects of AN TYM spell while kvm thread is preempted by tracking
conversion factor to the highest TSC rate
On 09/21/2010 01:05 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
Nested VMX
- looking for forward progress and better collaboration between the
Intel and IBM teams
- needs more review (not a new issue)
- use cases
- work todo
- merge baseline patch
- looks pretty good
- review is finding mostly small
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:58:48AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
Since __bio_map_kern() sets up bio-bi_end_io = bio_map_kern_endio
(which does a bio_put(bio)) doesn't that ensure we don't leak?
Indeed, that should take care of it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
Hi.
I installed a KVM virtual machine with Windows XP SP3 installed on it
with all updates from Windows Update.
I setted up an USB device from the host machine to be used on the
virtual machine with the command
qm set 107 -hostusb 2040:7070
The USB device is an Hauppauge WinTV Nova-T Stick DVB-T
Hi, thanks for the summary.
I also listened-in on the call. I'm glad these issues are being discussed.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Chris Wright wrote about KVM call minutes for Sept 21:
Nested VMX
- looking for forward progress and better collaboration between the
Intel and IBM teams
I'll be very
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of default_i386_debian_5_0 on qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/default_i386_debian_5_0/builds/573
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_kvm_2
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of default_i386_out_of_tree on qemu-kvm.
Full details are available at:
http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/builders/default_i386_out_of_tree/builds/510
Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu-kvm/
Buildslave for this Build: b1_qemu_kvm_2
* Nadav Har'El (n...@math.technion.ac.il) wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010, Chris Wright wrote about KVM call minutes for Sept 21:
Nested VMX
- looking for forward progress and better collaboration between the
Intel and IBM teams
I'll be very happy if anyone, be it from Intel or somewhere
30 matches
Mail list logo
