On 17.05.2009, at 08:48, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:22:20AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
static void svm_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
- nested_svm_intr(svm);
+ if(!(svm-vcpu.arch.hflags HF_GIF_MASK))
+
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:22:20AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
static void svm_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
- nested_svm_intr(svm);
+ if(!(svm-vcpu.arch.hflags HF_GIF_MASK))
+ return;
Why would this
On 17.05.2009, at 08:48, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:22:20AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
static void svm_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
-nested_svm_intr(svm);
+if(!(svm-vcpu.arch.hflags
While trying to get Hyper-V running, I realized that the interrupt injection
mechanisms that are in place right now are not 100% correct.
This patch makes nested SVM's interrupt injection behave more like on a
real machine.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |
