On 10/23/09 17:54, Stefan wrote:
Hello,
I have a simple question (sorry I'm a kvm beginner):
Is it right that a 64bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB) is
much faster than a 32bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB PAE).
Yes. With *that* much memory the 32bit guest
On 10/26/2009 10:58 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 10/23/09 17:54, Stefan wrote:
Hello,
I have a simple question (sorry I'm a kvm beginner):
Is it right that a 64bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB) is
much faster than a 32bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB PAE).
Yes.
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/26/2009 10:58 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 10/23/09 17:54, Stefan wrote:
Hello,
I have a simple question (sorry I'm a kvm beginner):
Is it right that a 64bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB) is
much faster than a 32bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB PAE).
On 10/26/2009 12:42 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Oh yes, without ept/npt the slowdown should indeed be significant
with this much memory.
How it is with 4Gb guest/mem without PAE (I mean, with
CONFIG_HIGHMEM_4G=y)?
Or even 2Gb? In case of npt or without.
It'll be slow. Just use x86_64
On 10/23/2009 05:54 PM, Stefan wrote:
Hello,
I have a simple question (sorry I'm a kvm beginner):
Is it right that a 64bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB) is
much faster than a 32bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB PAE).
(kvm guest and kvm host are Ubuntu 9.04, 2.6.28-15-server,
kvm 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3). eg
Hello,
I have a simple question (sorry I'm a kvm beginner):
Is it right that a 64bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB) is
much faster than a 32bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB PAE).
(kvm guest and kvm host are Ubuntu 9.04, 2.6.28-15-server,
kvm 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3). eg dpkg-reconfigure initramfs-tools
runs twice as
