Hi,
I have to remind that we're in a situation that we only have one
legacy branch. Sooner or later, we will have multiple versions of LibO
strings available on pootle, that not only make the workspace crowded,
but downloading zip folders and operations like this on them, make
pootle slow.
When
On 2011-04-17 23:33, André Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Am 17.04.2011 20:59, schrieb Andras Timar:
I also suggest removing version number from the name of the projects,
because it has several benefits. One of them is preserving
contribution statistics of the project.
That's a good point.
Hi,
As older versions like LibO 3.3.x are no longer used in pootle for
translation, I suggest removing all of them from pootle, so we will
have a single version of strings available on pootle. Each package
should be upgraded before removing the older version. For example, we
still have the old
2011/4/17 Hossein Noorikhah hossein...@gmail.com:
As older versions like LibO 3.3.x are no longer used in pootle for
translation, I suggest removing all of them from pootle, so we will
have a single version of strings available on pootle. Each package
should be upgraded before removing the
Hi,
Am 17.04.2011 20:59, schrieb Andras Timar:
I also suggest removing version number from the name of the projects,
because it has several benefits. One of them is preserving
contribution statistics of the project.
That's a good point. Statistics are important. I wonder what others
think.
